Dextrous VR in Professional Settings: the Importance of Stereoscopic Display and Hand-Image Collocation

  • John Waterworth
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


Virtual reality (VR) is becoming increasingly important in a variety of professional settings. Our particular interest is in applications requiring the examination and manipulation of detailed, volumetric medical images by surgeons and other medical staff. It is important to determine how best to maximise accuracy and speed of interaction without unrealistic technical or financial requirements. In this study, we compared performance on a trial task in a virtual environment, with and without stereoscopic display and with and without hand-image collocation. These are the most immediately tractable approaches to enhancing dexterity. Although both factors affected speed and accuracy of task completion, adding stereoscopy to desktop VR gave significantly greater benefits than adding hand-image collocation. Surprisingly, there was no additional benefit from combining the two. The work contributes to a better understanding of the factors that are important to the successful proliferation of dextrous VR in professional work settings.


Virtual Reality Virtual Environment Haptic Feedback Stereo Vision Stereoscopic Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barfield, W. Hendrix, C. and Bystrom, K.-E. (1999). Effects of Stereopsis and Head Tracking on Performance Using Desktop Virtual Environment Displays. Presence, 8, 2, 237–240, April 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bullinger, H-J., Bauer, W. and Braun, M. (1997). Virtual Environments. In Galvendy, S. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley, 1725–1759.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deering, M. (1992), High Resolution Virtual Reality. Computer Graphics 26, 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deering, M. (1996). The HoloSketch VR Sketching System. Communications of the ACM, 39, 5, 54–61, May 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Englund, K. and Mellbring, J. (1999). Virtual Reality för Produktutveckling i Industrin. Department of Innovation-technology, Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freidman, M., Starner, T. and Pentland, A. (1992). Device Synchronization using an Optimal Linear Filer. 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Computer Graphics, 57–62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalawski, R. S. (1993). The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, W. S., Ellis, S. R., Tyler, M., Hannaford, B. and Stark, L. (1987). A quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacKenzie, I. S. and Ware, C. (1993). Lag as a Determinant of Human Performance in Interactive Systems. INTERCHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Amsterdam, April 24–29). New York: ACM, 488–493.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poston, T. and Serra, L. (1996). Dextrous Virtual Work. Communications of the ACM, 39, 5, 37–45, May 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rekimoto, J. (1995). A vision-based head tracker for fish tank VR without head gear. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium’95, 94–100.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serra, L., Poston, T., Ng, H., Chua, B. C. and Waterworth, J. A. (1995). Interaction Techniques for a Virtual Workspace. Paper and video presented at the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Tele-Existence (ICAT)/Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST) ‘85, Maakuhari Messe, Japan, November 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ware, C., Arthur, K. and Booth, K. S. (1993). Fish tank virtual reality. INTERCHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Amsterdam, April 24–29). New York: ACM, 37–42.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yeh, Y. and Silverstein, L. D. (1992). Spatial judgements with monoscopic and stereoscopic presentation of perspective displays. Human Factors, 34, 583–600.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Waterworth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations