Advertisement

Dynamics in Interaction on the Responsive Workbench

  • Michal Koutek
  • Frits H. Post
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

In this paper we present a different view of user interaction with virtual worlds. We start from the question: how can we bring more natural object behavior into virtual environments? Currently, objects in VR applications often behave in a very un-natural way. Incorporation of physical laws in the virtual environment, together with monitoring natural user actions and behavior is desirable. We present some principles of physically more realistic behavior of virtual objects and a set of user input techniques suitable for semi-immersive VR devices such as the Responsive Workbench. We introduce springs as a new tool for assisting direct manipulation of objects in VEs.

Keywords

Virtual Environment Virtual World Ground Plane Virtual Object Interaction Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. van de Pol, W. Ribarsky, L. Hodges, F. Post, Interaction Techniques on the Virtual Workbench, Proc. of Eurographics Virtual Environments ‘89 workshop, Springer, Vienna 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bowman, D. and L. Hodges, An evaluation of Techniques for Grabbing and Manipulation Remote Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments, Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.D. Cutler, B. Fröhlich, P. Hanrahan, Two-handed Direct Manipulation on the Responsive Workbench, Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. D. Mulder, Remote Object Translation Methods for Immersive Virtual Environments, Proc. of Eurographics Virtual Environments ‘88, Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Bowman, L. Hodges, User Interface Constrains for Immersive Virtual Environment Applications, Proc. of IEEE VRAIS, 1997, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.Dede, M.C.Salzman, R.B.Loftin, The development of a virtual world for learning newtonian mechanics, Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Virtual Reality, Berlin: Springer/Verlag, 1996, pp. 87–106 Newton World: http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/newton.htm.com Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Keller, H. Stolz, A. Ziegler, T. Braunl, Virtual Mechanics - Simulation and Animation of Rigid Body Systems,1996. Aero: http://www.ee.uwa.edu.au/braunl/aero/.com Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.M. Massie, J.K. Salisbury, The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects, Proc. of ASME Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoprator Systems,p: 295–301, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.C. Ruspini, K. Kolarov, O. Hatib, The haptic display of complex objects, Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ‘87, pages 345–352, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.M. Brown, J.E. Colgate, Physics-based Approach to Haptic’s Display Proceedings ISMCR ‘84, Topical Workshop on Virtual Reality, Houston TX, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grigore C. Burdea, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality, Publishers City, ISBN 0–471–02141–5, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal Koutek
    • 1
  • Frits H. Post
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations