Advertisement

A Volumetric Virtual Environment for Catheter Insertion Simulation

  • Antonio Zorcolo
  • Enrico Gobbetti
  • Gianluigi Zanetti
  • Massimiliano Tuveri
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

We present an experimental catheter insertion simulation system that provides users co-registered haptic and head-tracked stereoscopic visual feedback. The system works on patient-specific volumetric data acquired using standard medical imaging modalities. The actual needle insertion operation is simulated for individual patients, rather than being an example of a model surgical procedure on standard anatomy. Patient specific features may thus be studied in detail by the trainees, overcoming one of the major limitations of current training techniques.

Keywords

Force Feedback Needle Insertion Haptic Feedback Haptic Device Active Contour Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. N. Berret, T. J. Parker, A. J. Harrison, T. A. Thomas, and A. Carr. Simulation of resistence forces acting on surgical needles. Proc Instn Mech Engrs, 211 (Part H), 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brian Cabral, Nancy Cam, and Jim Foran. Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware. In Arie Kaufman and Wolfgang Krueger, editors, 1994 Symposium on Volume Visualization,pages 91–98. ACM SIGGRAPH, October 1994. ISBN 0–89791–741–3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Cohen. On active contour models and balloons. CVGIP: Image Understanding 53(2):211–218, March 1991.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Timothy J. Cullip and Ulrich Neumann. Accelerating volume reconstruction with 3D texture hardware. Technical Report TR93–027, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, May 1 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robert A. Drebin, Loren Carpenter, and Pat Hanrahan. Volume rendering. Computer Graphics 22(4):65–74, August 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enrico Gobbetti, Piero Pili, Antonio Zorcolo, and Massimiliano Tuveri. Interactive virtual angioscopy. In CD-ROM and Video Proceedings IEEE Visualization,Conference held in Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, October 1998 (In press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Guan and R. G. Lipes. Innovative volume rendering using 3D texture mapping. In Image Capture Formatting and Display volume 2164 of SPIE. SPIE, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 1:321–331 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Todd Kulick. Building an opengl volume renderer. SGI Dev. News, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nelson Max. Optical models for direct volume rendering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1(2):99–108, June 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    John S. Montrym, Daniel R. Baum, David L. Dignam, and Christopher J. Migdal. Infinite Reality: a real-time graphics system. Computer Graphics, 31 (3A): 293–302, August 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luis Serra, Ng Hern, Chua Beng Choon, and Tim Poston. Interactive vessel tracing in volume data. In Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, April 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. O’Tool, R. Playter, W. Blank, N. Cornelius, W. Roberts, and M. Raibert. A novel virtual reality surgical trainer with force feedback: Surgeon vs. medical student performance. In The Second PHANToM User’s Group Proceedings, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allen Van Gelder and Kwansik Kim. Direct volume rendering with shading via three–dimensional textures. In 1996 Volume Visualization Symposium,pages 23–30. IEEE, October 1996. ISBN 0–89791–741–3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Washington University. MIR CTN documentation Version 2.8.3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antonio Zorcolo, Enrico Gobbetti, and Massimiliano Tuveri. Catheter insertion simulation with combined visual and haptic feedback. Technical Report VIDEOTAPE 99/80, CRS4, Center for Advanced Studies, Research, and Development in Sardinia, Cagliari, Italy, May 1999. Presented at the First PHANToM Users Research Symposium (PURS’99), Heidelberg, Germany, May 21–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Zorcolo
    • 1
  • Enrico Gobbetti
    • 1
  • Gianluigi Zanetti
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Tuveri
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Studies, Research, and Development in SardiniaCRS4UtaItaly

Personalised recommendations