EXOMIO: A 3D Simulator for External Beam Radiotherapy

  • Grigorios Karangelis
  • Nikolaos Zamboglou
  • Dimos Baltas
  • Georgios Sakas
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


Simulators are medical devices used in the oncology clinics to perform the simulation procedure for the external beam radiotherapy treatment. Unlikely for a clinic to obtain a real Simulator is a high investment in terms of money, space and personnel. The alternative here can be a Virtual Simulator (VS). The VSs are system-software that can perform the simulation process using the Computed Tomography (CT) data set of the patient, including the external patient’s skin landmarks, instead of the physical patient. In this paper we present EXOMIO, a 3D VS which supports high-end visualization techniques. As a result we can simulate every function of the real Simulator including component movement, light field projection and fluoroscopy. Further more we can provide the physicians with ergonomic volume definition and navigation tools.


Real Simulator Treatment Planning System Compute Tomography Data Virtual Simulator Compute Tomography Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baltas, D., Mueller-Sievers, K., Kober, B., Preliminary results of a intercomparison of quality control referring to therapy simulators. ESTRO, Second Biennial Meeting on Physics in Clinical Radiotherapy. Prague 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butker, E.K.; Helton, D.J.; Keller, J.W.; Hughes, L.L.; Crenshaw, T.; Davis, L.W. A totally integrated simulation technique for three field breast treatment using a CT simulator. Med Phys1996; 23: 1809–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai, W.; Karangelis, G.; Sakas, G. Volume Interaction Techniques in the Virtual Simulation of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision (Graphicon) Moscow, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai, W. Transfer functions in DRR volume rendering. CARS99, Paris, France, June 23–26, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, G.T.Y.; Pelizzari, C.A.; Vijayakumar, S. Imaging: The Basis for Effective Therapy. Front Radiat Ther Oncol1996; 29: 31–42.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conway J., Robinson, M.H., CT virtual simulation. Brit J Radiol1997; 70: 106–118.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levoy, M. Display of surface from volume data. IEEE CG&A, 1988:8(5).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michalski, J.M.; Purdy, J.A.; Harms, W.; Matthews, J.W. The CT-Simulation 3D Treatment Planning Process. Front Radiat Ther Oncol1996; 29: 43–56.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mueller-Sievers, K, Baltas, D., Kober B., Festelung and pruefung apparativer Qualitaetsmerkmale von Therapiesimulatoren. Z. Med. Phys. 1995; 5: 222–225.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mueller-Sievers, K, Baltas, D., Kober B., Ein Qualitaetssicherungsprogramm fuer Simulatoren in der Strahlentherapie. Strahlentherapie and Onkologie 1997; 12: 693–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagata, Y.; Nishidai, T.; Abe, M.; Takahashi, M.; Okajima, K.; Yamaoka, N.; Ishihara, H.; Kubo, Y.; Ohta, H.; Kazusa, C. CT Simulator: A new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy: Part 2. Clinical application. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys1990; 18: 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nishidai, T.; Nagata, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Abe, M.; Yamaoka, N.; Ishihara, H.; Kubo, Y.; Ohta, H.; Kazusa, C. CT Simulator: A new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy: Part 1. Description of system. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys1990; 18: 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perez, C.; Purdy, J.A.; Harms, W.; Gerber, R.; Matthews, J.; Grigsby P.W.; Graham, M.L.; Emami, B.; Lee, HK.; Michalski, JE; Baker, S. Design of a fully integrated three-dimensional computed tomography simulator and preliminary clinical evaluation. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys1994; 30: 887–897.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Purdy, J.A. 3D Radiation Treatment Planning: A New Era. Front Radiat Ther Oncol1996; 29: 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ragan, DP.; Forman, JD.; He, T.; Mesina, C. Clinical results of computerized tomography-based simulation with laser patient marking. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys1996; 34: 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenman, J.; Sailer, S.; Sherouse, G.; Chaney, EL.; Tepper, JE. Virtual simulation: Initial clinical results. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys1991; 20: 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenman, J. Where Will 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy Be at the End of the Decade? Front Radiat Ther Oncol1996; 29: 264–271.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakas, G. Interactive volume rendering of large fields. The Visual Computer, 1993, 9 (8): 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakas, G., Grimm, M. and Savopoulos, A. Optimised maximum intensity projection (MIP), Rendering Techniques ‘85, Springer Verlag 1995: 51–63.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schiebe, M.; Hoffmann, W. CT-Based Virtual Simulation Using the AdvantageSim 4.1. System. Strahlenther Onkol2000; 8: 377–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherouse, G.; Chaney, EL. The portable virtual simulator. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sherouse, G.; Mosher, C.; Novins, K.; Rosemann, J.; Chaney, E.L. Virtual simulation: concept and implementation. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference of the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy (ICCR). Scheveningen, The Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Co.; 1987: 433–436.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Valicenti, R.K.; Waterman, F.M.; Corn, B.W.; Curran, W.J. A prospective randomized study addressing the need for physical simulation following virtual simulation. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 1131–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vanuytsel, L.; Weltens, C. Imaging techniques for radiotherapy planning. Oncol in Practice1999; 2: 18–21.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vuong, T.; Parker, W.; An alternative mantle irradiation technique using 3D CT-based treatment planning for female patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys2000; 47: 739–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grigorios Karangelis
    • 1
  • Nikolaos Zamboglou
    • 2
  • Dimos Baltas
    • 2
  • Georgios Sakas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Graphische Daten Verarbeitung, FraunhoferDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Strahlenklinik, Klinikum OffenbachOffenbachGermany

Personalised recommendations