The Nucleon-Nucleon Problem in Quark Models

  • Fl. Stancu
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 14)


In the first part we summarize the status of the nucleon-nucleon (NN) problem in the context of Hamiltonian based constituent quark models and present results for the = 0 phase shifts obtained from the Goldstone-boson exchange model by applying the resonating group method. The second part deals with the construction of local shallow and deep equivalent potentials based on a Superymmetric Quantum Mechanics approach.


Phase Shift Quark Model Equivalent Potential Tensor Term Resonate Group Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D.A. Liberman: Phys. Rev. D16, 1542 (1977); C.E. DeTar: Phys. Rev. D17, 302 (1978); ibid. D17, 323 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Oka, K. Yazaki: Phys. Lett. B90, 41 (1980); Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 556 (1981); ibid. 66, 572 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Harvey: Nucl. Phys. A352, 301 (1980); ibid. A352, 356 (1980)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Cvetič, B. Golli, N. Mankoč-Borštnik, M. Rosina: Nucl. Phys. A395, 349 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Oka, K. Yazaki: In: Quarks and nuclei, ed. W. Weise, p.469. Singapore: World Scientific 1984; F. Myhrer, J. Wroldsen: Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 629 (1988); K. Shimizu: Rep. Prog. Phys. 52, 1 (1999); K. Shimizu, S. Takeuchi, A. Buchmann: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 137, 43 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.M. Kusainov, V.G. Neudatchin, I.T. Obukhovski: Phys. Rev. C44, 2343 (1991); Z. Zhang, A. Faessler, U. Straub, L.Ya. Glozman: Nucl. Phys. A578, 573 (1994); A. Valcarce, A. Buchmann, F. Fernandez, A. Faessler: Phys. Rev. C50, 2246 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Plessas: these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L.Ya. Glozman, Z. Papp, W. Plessas, K. Varga, R.F. Wagenbrunn: Nucl. Phys. A623, 90c (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Kamimura: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 62, 236 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bartz, Fl. Stancu: Phys. Rev. C63, 034001 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Bartz, Fl. Stancu: Nucl. Phys. A688, 915 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Golli, M. Rosina: Phys. Lett. B393, 161 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Bartz: PhD Thesis, University of Liège, 2002 hep-ph/0205138Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, M.C.M. Rentmeester, J.J. de Swart: Phys. Rev. C48, 792 (1993); V.G.J. Stoks, R.A.M. Klomp, C.P.F. Terheggen, J.J. de Swart: Phys. Rev. C49, 2950 (1994) (cf. Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Saito: Progr. Theor. Phys. 41, 705 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.V. Reid, Jr.: Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 411 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.V. Sukumar: J. Phys. A18, 2917 (1985); A18, 2937 (1985)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.-M. Sparenberg, D. Baye: Phys. Rev. C55, 2175 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.F. Samsonov, Fl. Stancu: Phys. Rev. C66, 034001 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V.I. Kukulin, V.M. Krasnopol’skii, V.N. Pomerantsev, P.B. Sazonov: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43, 355 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fl. Stancu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physics B.5University of LiègeLiège 1Belgium

Personalised recommendations