Skip to main content

The phylogeny of the Papaveraceae sensu lato: morphological, geographical and ecological implications

  • Conference paper
Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae

Part of the book series: Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 9 ((SYSTEMATICS,volume 9))

Abstract

On the background of the phylogeny of the Papaveraceae s.l., the evolution of the androecium and gynoecium, the geographical distribution, and the ecological differentiation of the family is discussed. An effort is made to homologize the diverse androecia of Pteridophyllum, Hypecoum, Fumariaceae and Papaveraceae s.str., and it is concluded that both the polyandrous androecium as found in the Papaveraceae s.str. and the polycarpellate gynoecium as found in Papaveraceae s. str. subfam. Papaveroideae incl. Platystemonoideae are secondary and derived from whorled oligomerous androecia and bicarpellate gynoecia, respectively. The comparative consideration of the geographical distribution, ecology and diversity of various monophyletic units within the family suggests (1) that forest floor habitats might be ancestral in the family, (2) that in parts of the family generic diversification preceded the break-up of the northern continents, and (3) that aridification of the environment was a major stimulus for both diversification and morphological divergence in the family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arber, A., 1932: Studies in floral morphology. IV. On the Hypecoideae, with special reference to the androecium. — New Phytol. 31: 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, F. R., Kadereit, J. W., 1995: Three intercontinental disjunctions in Papaveraceae subfam. Chelidonioideae: evidence from chloroplast DNA. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 9: 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boufford, D. E., Spongberg, S. A., 1983: Eastern Asian — eastern North American phytogeographical relationships — a history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, C., 1982: Zur Kenntnis der Fruchtmorphologie der Papaveraceae Juss. s.str. und der Hypecoaceae (Prantl & Kündig) Nak — Feddes Repert. 93: 153–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983: Zur Morphologie der Samenschale in den Papaveraceae Juss. s.str. und Hypecoaceae (Prantl & Kündig) Nak. — Feddes Repert. 94: 361–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1985: Frucht-und Samenanatomie von Pteridophyllum racemosum Sieb. et Zucc., und die Position der monotypischen Gattung in den Papaverales. — Feddes Repert. 96: 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchenau, F., 1866: Bemerkungen über den Blüthenbau der Fumariaceen und Cruciferen.-Flora 49: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, B. L., 1971: From the South: an African view of the floras of Western Asia. — In Davis, P. H., Harper, P. C., Hedge, I. C., (Eds): Plant life of South-West Asia, pp. 135–149. — Edinburgh: The Botanical Society of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celakovsky, L. J., 1894: Das Reductionsgesetz der Blüten. — Sitzungsber. Böhm. Ges. Math. Naturwiss. 150: 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A. E., 1990: Infrageneric division of the genus Hypecoum L. (Papaveraceae). — Nordic J. Bot. 10: 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A. W., 1865: Über den Blüthenbau der Fumariaceen, Cruciferen und einiger Capparideen. — Flora 48: 433–444, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1987: Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1995: Floral structure and evolution in Ranunculanae. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 9: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., Leins, P., 1981: Zur Spirale in Magnolien-Blüten. — Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 56: 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983: Zur Sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 105: 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, W. R., 1962: A comparative morphology of the Papaveraceae. — Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedde, F., 1905: Die geographische Verbreitung der Papaveraceae. — Englers Bot. Jahrb. 36, Beiblatt 81: 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1909: Papaveraceae-Hypecoideae et Papaveraceae-Papaveroideae. — In Engler, A. (Ed.): Das Pflanzenreich IV, 104, pp. 1–430. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1936: Papaveraceae. — In Engler, A., Harms, H. (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 17b, 2nd edn., pp. 5–145. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedel, J., 1938: Note sur la Structure anatomique du Pteridophyllum racemosum Sieb. et Zucc. — Bull. Soc. Bot. France 85: 406–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, K.-F., 1975a: Beiträge zur Morphologie und Verbreitung der Papaveraceae. 1. Teil: Infloreszenzmorphologie der Papaveraceae; Wuchsformen der Chelidonieae. — Flora 164: 185–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1975b: Beiträge zur Morphologie und Verbreitung der Papaveraceae. 2. Teil: Die Wuchsformen der Papaveraceae, Eschscholzieae und Platystemonoideae. — Flora 164: 393–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, De-Yuan, 1993: Eastern Asian North American disjunctions and their biological significance. — Cathaya 5: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoot, S., Crane, P., 1995: Inter-familial relationships in the Ranunculidae based on molecular systematics. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 9: 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., 1921: The genera of Fumariaceae and their distribution. — Bull. Misc. Inf., Royal Bot. Gardens, Kew 3: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jork, K. B., Kadereit, J. W., 1995: Molecular phylogeny of the Old World representatives of Papaveraceae subfam. Papaveroideae with special emphasis on the genus Meconopsis — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 9: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadereit, J. W., 1988: Sectional affinities and geographical distribution in the genus Papaver L. (Papaveraceae). — Beitr. Biol. Pfl. 63: 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993: Papaveraceae. — In Kubitzki, K., (Ed): The families and genera of vascular plants 2, pp. 494–506. — Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattner, F. R., Jork, K., Schwarzbach, A., 1994: Phylogenetic analysis of the Papaveraceae s.l. (incl. Fumariaceae, Hypecoaceae, and Pteridophyllum) based on morphological characters. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116: 361–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrer, A. B., 1991: Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. — Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layka, S., 1976: Les methodes modernes de la palynologie appliquées a l’étude des Papaverales. — Unpublished Dissertation, University of Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léger, L. J., 1894: Recherches sur l’appareil végétatif des Papavéracées (Papavéracées et Fumariacées D. C.). — Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie 18: 195–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehminger, R., 1985: Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Fumariaceen-Blüten. — Unpublished Diplomarbeit, University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., 1985: Besonderheiten in der Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger Fumariaceen-Blüten. — In Ehrendorfer, F., (Ed.): 8. Symposium Morphologie, Anatomie und Systematik. Zusammenfassungen; 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., Erbar, C., 1985: Ein Beitrag zur Blütenentwicklung der Aristolochiaceae, einer Vermittlergruppe zu den Monokotylen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991: Entwicklungsmuster in Blüten und ihre mutmaβlichen phylogenetischen Zusammenhänge. — Biol. Unserer Zeit 21: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidén, M., 1986: Synopsis of Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae) with a monograph of the tribe Fumarieae. — Opera Bot. 88: 1–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993a: Pteridophyllaceae. — In Kubitzki, K., (Ed.): The families and genera of vascular plants 2, pp. 556–557. — Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993b: Fumariaceae. — In Kubitzki, K., (Ed): The families and genera of vascular plants 2, pp. 310–318. — Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, O., 1977: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte monosymmetrischer Dicotylen-Blüten.-Dissertationes Botanicae 38: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmuller, H., Leins, P., 1967: Die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Kreuzblütler und Mohngewächse. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 86: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meusel, H., 1969: Beziehungen in der Florendifferenzierung von Eurasien und Nordamerika. — Flora 158: 537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murbeck, S., 1912: Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Papaveraceen. — Kongl. Svenska Vetensk. Acad. Handl. 50: 1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payer, J. B., 1857: Traité d’organogénie comparée de la fleur. — Paris: V. Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., 1972: Plant species disjunctions: a summary. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 59: 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, D. I., 1974: Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61: 539–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronse Decraene, L. P., Smets, E. F., 1990: The systematic relationship between Begoniaceae and Papaveraceae: a comparative study of floral development. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Belg. 60: 229–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992a: An updated interpretation of the androecium of the Fumariaceae. — Canad. J. Bot. 70: 1765–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992b: Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae: definition, distribution and systematic value. — Nordic J. Bot. 12: 621–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, M., 1960: A morphological study of Fumariaceae and the taxonomical significance of the characters examined. — Acta Horti Bergiani 19: 121–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzbach, A., Kadereit, J. W., 1995: Rapid radiation of North American desert genera of the Papaveraceae: evidence from restriction site mapping of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA fragments. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] 9: 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K. R., 1961: Revision of Dicentra. — Brittonia 13: 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vent, W., Mory, B., 1973: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Sippenstruktur der Gattungen Glaucium Adans. und Dicranostigma Hooker. & Thomson (Papaveraceae). — Gleditschia 1: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Zhenyi, 1983: On the significance of Pacific intercontinental discontinuity. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, Xuan, 1993: The taxonomic and evolution and distribution of Papaveraceae.-Acta Bot. Yunnanica 15: 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kadereit, J.W., Blattner, F.R., Jork, K.B., Schwarzbach, A. (1995). The phylogeny of the Papaveraceae sensu lato: morphological, geographical and ecological implications. In: Jensen, U., Kadereit, J.W. (eds) Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 9, vol 9. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7361-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6612-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics