Skip to main content

Ranunculiflorae — delimitation, phylogeny, diversification

  • Conference paper
Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae

Part of the book series: Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 9 ((SYSTEMATICS,volume 9))

Abstract

Within the Ranalean complex the Ranunculiflorae form a natural entity that in all modern classifications re-appears more or less in the same circumscription, although at different rank and under different names. The Ranunculiflorae are so distinct from woody Ranales (Magnoliiflorae) that a higher (superordinal) taxonomic rank appropriately expresses their relative isolation and individuality. On morphological and phytochemical grounds, several families that at one time have been assigned to this alliance, have to be excluded from it, such as the Nymphaeaceae (but not Nelumbo), Nepenthaceae, and Paeoniaceae. Phylogenetic links of the Ranunculiflorae with magnolialean families may exist but are probably less tight than often assumed; the Illiciales are no vital link between the two major groups. In contrast to the “eudicot” concept it is argued that tricolpate pollen in the Ranunculiflorae originated independently from non-magnolialean dicotyledons. Attention is called to different themes of diversification in several families of the Ranunculiflorae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arber, E. A. N., Parkin, J., 1907: On the origin of angiosperms. — J. Linn. Soc. Bott. 38: 29–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartling, F. G., 1830: Ordines naturales plantarum. — Göttingen: Dieterich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey, C. E., 1893: Evolution and classification. — Bot. Gaz. 18: 329–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1915: The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2: 109–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de, 1824: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, 1. — Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1968: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. — Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981: An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, G., 1989: The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons, pp. 249–260.-In Kit tan, (Ed.): The Davis and Hedge Festschrift. — Edinburgh: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1975: A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. — Bot. Not. 128: 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980: A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBuhr, L. E., 1975: Phylogenetic relationships of the Sarraceniaceae. — Taxon 24: 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, A. J. F. M., 1983: A revision of the genera Penianthus MIERS and Sphenocentrum Pierre, (Menispermaceae) of West and Central Africa. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 53: 17–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M. J., Doyle, J., 1989: Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of Hamamelidae. — In Crane, P. R., Blackmore, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 1, pp. 17–45. — Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. A., Donoghue, M. J., 1993: Phylogenies and angiosperm diversification. — Paleobiol. 19: 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotton, C. A., Ward, J. V., 1990: Early Cretaceous tetrads, zonasulculate pollen, and Winteraceae. II. Cladistic analysis and implications. — Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1558–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., 1897: Übersicht über die Unterabteilungen, Klassen, Reihen, Unterreihen und Familien der Embryophyta siphonogamae. — In Engler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Nachträge und Register zu Teil II-IV, pp. 341–357. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, M. R., Kaplan, M. A., Gottlieb, O. R., 1995: Diterpenes, taxonomic markers? — Pl. Syst. Evol. 195 (3/4): 149–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friis, E.-M., Crane, P. R., 1989: Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Hamamelidae. — In Crane, P. R., Blackmore, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidales, 1, pp. 155–174. — Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, O. R., 1982: Micromolecular evolution, systematics and ecology. — Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. A. C., Zocher, D. H. T., 1993: A chemosystematic overview of Magnoliidae, Ranunculidae, Caryophylidae and Hamamelidae. — In Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The families and genera of vascular plants, II, pp. 20–31. — Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1896: Betrachtungen über die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Ampelideen und anderer Pflanzenfamilien. — Natuurk. Tijdschr. Nederl. Indie 56: 300–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1905: Ein zweiter Entwurf des natürlichen (phylogenetischen) Systems der Blütenpflanzen. Vorläufige Mitteilung. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 23: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R., 1990: Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen, 9. — Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiepko, P., 1965: Das zentrifugale Androeceum der Paeoniaceae. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 77: 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H., 1990: Angiospermen. Leitfaden durch die Ordnungen und Familien der Bedecktsamer. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, K. L., 1976: Arrangement of some monosulcate, trisulcate, dicolpate, and tricolpate pollen types in the tetrads, and some aspects of evolution in the angiosperms. — In Ferguson, I. K., Muller, J., (Eds): The evolutionary significance of the exine, pp. 101–124. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., 1972: Probleme der Grossystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 85: 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987a: Phenylpropanoid metabolism in relation to land plant origin and diversification. — J. Pl. Physiol. 131: 17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1987b: Origin and significance of trimerous flowers. — Taxon 36: 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1993: Introduction. — In Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, II, pp. 1–12. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J., 1846: The vegetable kingdom. — London: Bradbur & Evans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Yang, C.-S., 1989: Pollen morphology of Illiciaceae and its significance in systematics. — Chinese J. Bot. 1: 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loconte, H., Stevenson, D. W., 1991: Cladistics of the Magnoliidae. — Cladistics 7: 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markgraf, F., 1955: Über Laubblatthomologien und verwandtschaftliche Zusammenhänge bei Sarraceniales. — Planta 46: 414–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchior, H., (Ed.), 1964: A. Engler’S Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, II. — Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicke, J., Skvarla, J. J., 1981: Pollen morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the Berberidaceae. — Smithsonian Contrib. Bot. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983: Pollen morphology and the relationships of the Corynocarpaceae. — Taxon 32: 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M. W., Les, D. H., Parks, C. R., 1993: Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: Cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, M., 1960: A morphological study of the Fumariaceae and the taxonomic significance of the characters examined. — Acta Horti Bergiani 19, 4: 121–248, pl. I–XII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R., 1964: Die systematische Stellung der Dioncophyllaceen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 83: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. C., 1972: An appraisal of the orders and families of primitive extant angiosperms. — J. Indian Bot. Soc., Golden Jubilee Vol. 50A: 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, H., 1963: Über die mögliche phylogenetische Bedeutung der Pollenmorphologie der madagassischen Bubbia perrieri R. Cap. (Winteraceae). — Grana Palynol. 4: 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1969: Flowering plants, origin and dispersal. — Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). — Bot. Rev. 46: 225–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1987: Systema Magnoliophytorum. — Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, M., 1972: Morphology and phyletic relationship of the Glaucidiaceae. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 85: 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanikaimoni, G., 1986: Evolution of Menispermaceae. — Canad. J. Bot. 64: 3130–3133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1976: A phylogenetic classification of the angiospermae. — Evol. Biol. 9: 35–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1992: Classification and geography of the flowering plants. — Bot. Rev. 58: 225–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H., 1981: Embryological studies in Glaucidium palmatum Sieb, et Zucc. with discussion on the taxonomy of the genus. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 94: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VAN Campo, M., 1976: Patterns of pollen morphological variation within taxa.-In Ferguson, I. K., Muller, J., (Eds): The evolutionary significance of the exine, pp. 125–137. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. V., 1935: Handbuch der systematischen Botanik, 4th edn. — Wien: Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodehouse, R. P., 1935: Pollen grains. — New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1936: Evolution of pollen grains. — Bot. Rev. 2: 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kubitzki, K. (1995). Ranunculiflorae — delimitation, phylogeny, diversification. In: Jensen, U., Kadereit, J.W. (eds) Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 9, vol 9. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7361-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6612-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics