Advertisement

Qualitative Methods in Inverse Scattering Theory

  • David L. Colton

Abstract

A major problem in the use of ultrasound or microwaves for purposes of nondestructive testing or medical imaging is the computational complexity of solving the inverse scattering problem that arises in such applications. This is due to the fact that in order to achieve satisfactory resolution and sufficient penetration of the wave into the material it is often necessary to use frequencies in the resonance region. In this case the inverse scattering problem is not only improperly posed but also nonlinear and even in the case of two dimensions the time needed to solve such problems can be prohibitive. To date the time consuming nature of the problem has mainly been dealt with by the introduction of various innovative schemes that avoid the use of volume integral equations and instead rely on finite difference or finite element methods (cf. [5], [8]). However, for large scale problems (for example those involving imaging of the human body) the problem of computational complexity remains a serious problem for any practitioner. In this paper we would like to propose a different approach to this problem that, although still in its infancy, has the promise of providing rapid solutions to a number of inverse scattering problems of practical significance.

Keywords

Inverse Scattering Resonance Region Scattered Field Field Pattern Trace Class Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Colton and A. Kirsch, Karp’s theorem in acoustic scattering theory, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 103 (1988), 783–788.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Colton and A. Kirsch, A simple method for solving inverse scattering problems in the resonance region, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Colton and R. Kress, Eigenvalues of the far field operator for the Helmholtz equation in an absorbing medium, SIAM J. Appl. Math 55 (1995), 1724–1735.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Colton and P. Monk, A new approach to detecting leukemia: using computational electromagnetics, Computational Sciences and Engineering 2 (1995), 46–52.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.J. Davis, Interpolation and Approximation, Dover, New York, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Nachman, Global uniqueness for a two dimensional inverse boundary value problem, Annals of Mathematics 143 (1996), 71–96.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Natterer and F. Wübbeling, A propagation-backpropagation method for ultrasound tomography, Inverse Problems 11 (1995), 1225–1232.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Ringrose, Compact Non-Self Adjoint Operators, Van Nostrand Reinhold, London, 1971.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B.P. Rynne and B.D. Sleeman, The interior transmission problem and inverse scattering from inhomogeneous media, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 22 (1991), 1755–1762.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Sun and G. Uhlmann, Recovery of singularities for formally determined inverse problems, Comm. Math. Physics 153 (1993), 431–445.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Colton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations