Skip to main content

On the direction of ideas and the principal tendencies of the Vienna Mathematical Colloquium

  • Chapter
Karl Menger
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

This article is not so much intended as a recapitulation of all the results achieved by the Vienna Mathematical Colloquium1 during its six years of existence-such a recapitulation would in fact require a much larger space-but intends instead to expound the direction of the ideas that were pursued in this colloquium. Moreover, we limit ourselves to shedding light on the tendencies of the colloquium in the direction of geometry, although it certainly did not deal exclusively with geometrical studies. And in truth, apart from the fact that the geometric researches cultivated in this colloquium often required investigations into other fields of mathematics, other studies, above all in logic2, but also regarding new applications of the exact sciences to problems of a sociological character, were carried out.3

I thank Dr. L. GEYMONAT for having helped me in writing the present article in Italian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See: Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums. Unter Mitwirkung von K. GÖDEL und G. NÖBELING herausgegeben von K. MENGER, volumes 1–6 (Deuticke, Vienna). In the sequel we cite them as “Ergebnisse”.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apart from a short lecture of K.GÖDEL (Ergebnisse 3, p.12) on his fundamental results concerning the completeness and the consistency of axiomatic systems [that is: in every theory that contains the arithmetic of PEANO one finds propositions that cannot be proved by means of this theory itself, and in particular it is impossible to prove the consistency of such a theory without stepping outside of the axiomatic system on which it is based], there are investigations of classical mathematical logic, of many-valued logic (GöDEL, TARSKI, PARRY) and of intuitionistic logic, among them a proof of the surprising fact that the so-called intuitionistic arithmetic is only apparently more restrictive than classical arithmetic, whereas in an appropriate interpretation it contains the latter (GöDEL, Ergebnisse 4, p.34).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For instance on the existence and uniqueness of the equations of production in mathematical economics (See SCHLESINGER-WALD, Ergebnisse 6, p. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See MENGER: Neuere Methoden und Probleme der Geometrie, Verhandl. d. Intern. Math. Kongr., Zürich 1932, vol. I, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See MENGER: Dimensionstheorie, Leipzig 1928, where one finds the complete references up to 1928, including in particular the works of URYSOHN. See also NÖBELING: Die neuesten Ergebnisse der Dimensionstheorie, Jahresbericht d. deutsch. Math. Ver., 41, 1931, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See MENGER: Kurventheorie, Teubner, Leipzig, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For the literature see NÖBELING, Die neuesten Ergebnisse der Dimensionstheorie, Jahresbericht d. deutsch. Math. Ver., 41, 1931, p. 1 loc.cit., footnote 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a short proof see FLORES, Ergebnisse 5, p. 17 and vol.6, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See MENGER, Mathem. Annalen, 100, p.76, and for an abstract Ergebnisse 1, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a simple new proof of this theorem, see ARONSZAJN, Ergebnisse vol. 6, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See MENGER, Math. Annalen 100, p. 113 and, for an abstract, Ergebnisse 1, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See WALD, Ergebnisse 5, pp. 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See MENGER, Ergebnisse 2, p. 34; WALD-FLEXER, Ergebnisse 5, p. 32 and, for an even more farreaching generalization, TAUSSKY, Ergebnisse 6, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. This definition and those of a real metric space and a positive metric space given on the following pages should not be confused with the concept of a metric space in the sense of FRÉCHET (See p. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  15. loc.cit. footnote 11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See MENGER, Mathem. Annalen, 100, pp. 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See MENGER: Zur Theorie der Bogenkrümmung, Mathem. Annalen, 103, p. 480; Jahresber. d. deutsch. Math. Ver., 50, pp. 211–213, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See WALD, Ergebnisse 6, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See WALD, Ergebnisse volume 7, that will appear in autumn 1935. This article will also contain a simplification of the definition of curvature stated above.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menger, K. (1998). On the direction of ideas and the principal tendencies of the Vienna Mathematical Colloquium. In: Dierker, E., Sigmund, K. (eds) Karl Menger. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6470-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6470-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7330-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6470-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics