Efficient Image Generation for Multiprojector and Multisurface Displays

  • Ramesh Raskar
  • Matt Cutts
  • Greg Welch
  • Wolfgang Stürzlinger
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


We describe an efficient approach to rendering a perspectively correct image on a potentially irregular display surface that may be illuminated with one or more distinct devices. The first pass of the technique generates an image of the desired graphics model using conventional rendering. The second pass projects that image as a texture onto a model of the display surface, then re-renders the textured display surface model from the viewpoint of each display device. The algorithm scales with the complexity of the display surface, and is constant with respect to the complexity of the graphics model.


Graphic Model Display Surface Correct Image Texture Mapping Single Projector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Bennett98]
    David T. Bennett. Chairman and Co-Founder of Alternate Realities Corporation, 215 Southport Drive Suite 1300, Morrisville, NC 27560, USA. Cited 29 March 1998, available at http://www.virtual-reality.com.Google Scholar
  2. [Cruz-Neira93]
    Carolina Cruz-Neira, Daniel J. Sandin, and Thomas A. DeFanti. 1993. “Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE,” SIGGRAPH 93 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. [Dorsey91]
    Julie O’B. Dorsey, François X. Sillion, Donald P. Greenberg. 1991. “Design and Simulation of Opera Lighting and Projection Effects,” SIGGRAPH 91 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Addison-Wesley, pp 41–50.Google Scholar
  4. [Jarvis97]
    Kevin Jarvis, “Real Time 60Hz Distortion Correction on a Silicon Graphics IG,” in Real Time Graphics, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 6–7, February 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [Kaiser98]
    Kaiser Electro-Optics, Inc., “Full Immersion Head Mounted Display,” cited 29 March 1998, located at http://www.keo.com/Product_Displays_ARPA.html.Google Scholar
  6. [Max91]
    Nelson Max. 1991. “Computer animation of photosynthesis,” Proceedings of the Second Eurographics Workshop on Animation and Simulation, Vienna, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
  7. [Raskar98a]
    Ramesh Raskar, Matt Cutts, Greg Welch, and Wolfgang Stürzlinger. 1998. “Efficient Image Generation for Multiprojector and Multisurface Displays,” UNC Computer Science Technical Report TR98-016, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, March 1998, located at ftp://ftp.cs.unc.edu/pub/technical-reports/Google Scholar
  8. [Raskar98b]
    Ramesh Raskar, Greg Welch, Matt Cutts, Adam Lake, Lev Stesin, and Henry Fuchs. 1998. “The Office of the Future: A Unified Approach to Image-Based Modeling and Spatially Immersive Displays,” to appear in SIGGRAPH 98 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Addison-Wesley, July 1998.Google Scholar
  9. [Segal92]
    Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, and Paul E. Haeberli. 1992. “Fast shadows and lighting effects using texture mapping,” SIGGRAPH 92 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, Addison Wesley, volume 26, pp. 249–252, July 1992.Google Scholar
  10. [UnderKoffler97]
    John Underkoffler. “A View From the Luminous Room,” Springer-Verlag London Ltd., Personal Technologies (1997) 1:49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramesh Raskar
    • 1
  • Matt Cutts
    • 1
  • Greg Welch
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Stürzlinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations