Some Future Directions in Fieldbus Research and Development

  • J.-D. Decotignie


In this paper, we attempt to explore the different topics where there still exist opportunities for research and development in the fieldbus domain. Different venues are explored and the main problems are outlined. References to on-going work are given.


Controller Area Network Transmission Speed Industrial Network Message Transmission Time Single Personal Computer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Kopetz, K. Kim, “Temporal Uncertainties in interactions among Real-Time Objects”, 9th symposium on reliable distributed systems, Huntsville, USA, Oct. 9–11, 1990, pp. 165–174.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Tindell et al., “Analysing Real-Time Communications: Controller Area Network”, proc. of the IEEE Real-Time System Symposium, pp. 259–263, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Tovar, F. Vasques, “Guaranteeing Real-Time Message Deadlines in Profibus Networks”, proc. of the 10th Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Le Lann, N. Rivierre, “Real-Time Communications over Broadcast networks: the CSMA-DCR and the DOD-CSMA-CD Protocols”, INRIA research report 1863, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Agrawal et al., “Guaranteeing synchronous message deadlines with the timed token medium access protocol”, IEEE Trans. On Computers, vol.43, pp.327–339, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Li, “Real-Time Communication in an Industrial Network-Profibus”, PhD Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Cena, A. Valenzano, “An improved CAN fieldbus for Industrial Applications”, IEEE Trans. On Industrial Electronics, vol. 44(4), pp. 553–564, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Tovar et al., “Adding Local Priority-based dispatching Mechanisms to P-Net Networks: A fixed Priority Approach”, Proc. of the 11th Euromicro Conf. On Real-Time Systems, York, June 9–11, 1999, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.-D. Decotignie, P. Prasad, “Spatio-Temporal Constraints in Fieldbus: Requirements and Current Solutions”, 19th IFAC/IFIP Workshop on Real-Time Programming, Isle of Reichnau, June 22–24, pp.9–14,1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Morel, A, Croisier and J.-D. Decotignie, Wireless Extension of a Factory Instrumentation Fieldbus (FIP), In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV’96), Westin Stamford, Singapore, pp. 2282–2286,1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Izikowitz, M. Solvie, “The OLFCHA project, Industrial Needs for Time-Critical Wireless Communication and Wireless Data Transmission and Application Layer Support for Time-Critical Communication”, Informatik Aktuell/Euro-ARCH’93,1993.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Mullender, “Distributed Systems”, ACM Press, New-York, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yeqiong Song et al., “Validation of distributed real time systems thanks to performance evaluation of their physical architecture”, Proc. CESA′96Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Törngren, “Modelling and Design of Distributed Real-Time Control Applications”, PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Kouthon, J.-D. Decotignie, “Improving Time Performances of Distributed PLC Applications”, ETFA′96, 5th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Kauai, Hawaii, November 18-21, 1996, pp.656–662.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Synergetic Micro Systems inc, “Industrial Ethernet”, white paper, 1999 (available at http://www.Industrial Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Ruiz et al, “Using Firewire as Industrial Network”, 19th Int. Conf. Of the Chilean Computer Science Society, Talca, Chile, Nov. 8-13, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Koppenhoefer et al., “Fieldbus Based Integrated Communication and Control Systems”, Proc. CESA′96, Lille, France, July 9-12,1996, pp.1316–1321.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Halevi, A. Ray, “Integrated Communication and Control Systems: Part I-Analysis”, J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 110(12), pp.367–373,1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEC TC65C, “Function Blocks for Industrial-Process Measurement and Control Systems-Part 1: Architecture”, committee draft 65/240/CD, June 4,1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-D. Decotignie
    • 1
  1. 1.CSEMNeuchatelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations