Advertisement

Density Control for Photon Maps

  • Frank Suykens
  • Yves D. Willems
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

The photon map method allows efficient computation of global illumination in general scenes. Individual photon hits, generated using Monte Carlo particle tracing, are stored in the maps and form a geometry independent representation of the illumination. Two important issues with the photon map are memory requirements to store the photons and the question how many photons are needed for an accurate representation of illumination in a certain scene. In this paper we introduce a method to control the density of photon maps by storing photons selectively based on a local required density criterion. This reduces memory usage significantly since in unimportant or over-dense regions less photons are stored. Results for caustic photon maps and global photon maps representing full illumination show a decrease in number of photons of a factor of 2 to 5. The required density states how accurate the photon map should be at a certain location and determines how many photons are needed in total. We also derive such a criterion based on a novel path-importance-based first pass, taking some steps towards solving the difficult ‘how many photons’ question.

Keywords

Global Illumination Density Control Require Density Specular Surface Pixel Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    James R. Arvo. Backward Ray Tracing. In ACM SIGGRAPH ’86 Course Notes — Developments in Ray Tracing, volume 12, August 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Philip Dutre and Yves D. Willems. Potential-Driven Monte Carlo Particle Tracing for Diffuse Environments with Adaptive Probability Density Functions. In P. M. Hanrahan and W. Purgathofer, editors, Rendering Techniques ’95, pages 306–315, New York, NY, 1995. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul S. Heckbert. Adaptive radiosity textures for bidirectional ray tracing. Computer Graphics, 24(4): 145–154, August 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Homan Igehy. Tracing ray differentials. Computer Graphics, 33(Annual Conference Series): 179–186, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henrik Wann Jensen. Importance driven path tracing using the photon map. In P. M. Hanrahan and W. Purgathofer, editors, Rendering Techniques ’95, pages 326–335 326–335. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. also in Proceedings of the Sixth Eurographics Rendering Workshop, 1995 (Rendering Techniques ’95, Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henrik Wann Jensen. Global illumination using photon maps. In Xavier Pueyo and Peter Schröder, editors, Eurographics Rendering Workshop 1996, pages 21–30, New York City, NY, June 1996. Eurographics, Springer Wien. ISBN 3–211–82883–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henrik Wann Jensen. Rendering caustics on non-lambertian surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum, 16(1):57–64, 1997. ISSN 0167–7055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henrik Wann Jensen. A practical guide to global illumination using photon maps. In ACM SIGGRAPH ’99 Course Notes — Unpublished, chapter 7, pages 1–72. 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henrik Wann Jensen and Niels Jørgen Christensen. Photon maps in bidirectional Monte Carlo ray tracing of complex objects. Computers and Graphics, 19(2):215–224, March-April 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henrik Wann Jensen and Per H. Christensen. Efficient simulation of light transport in scenes with participating media using photon maps. In Computer Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH ’98 Proceedings), pages 311–320, 1998. r.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. T. Kajiya. The rendering equation. In Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH ’86 Proceedings), volume 20, pages 143–150, August 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. P. Lafortune and Y. D. Willems. A theoretical framework for physically based rendering. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(2):97–107, June 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dani Lischinski, Brian Smits, and Donald P. Greenberg. Bounds and Error Estimates for Radiosity. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1994 (ACM SIGGRAPH ’94 Proceedings), pages 67–74, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. N. Pattanaik and S. P. Mudur. Adjoint equations and random walks for illumination computation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 14(1):77–102, January 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ingmar Peter and Georg Pietrek. Importance driven construction of photon maps. In G. Drettakis and N. Max, editors, Rendering Techniques ’98 (Proceedings of Eurographics Rendering Workshop ’98), pages 269–280, New York, NY, 1998. Springer Wien.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peter Shirley. A ray tracing method for illumination calculation in diffuse specular scenes. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface ’90, pages 205–212, Toronto, Ontario, May 1990.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.W. Silverman. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapmann and Hall, New York, NY, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brian E. Smits, James R. Arvo, and David H. Salesin. An importance-driven radiosity algorithm. Computer Graphics, 26(2):273–282, July 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Suykens and Y. D. Willems. Weighted multipass methods for global illumination. In Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics ’99), volume 18, pages C-209-C-220, September 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eric Veach and Leonidas J. Guibas. Optimally Combining Sampling Techniques for Monte Carlo Rendering. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1995 (ACM SIGGRAPH ’95 Proceedings), pages 419–28, 1995.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gregory J. Ward, Francis M. Rubinstein, and Robert D. Clear. A Ray Tracing Solution for Diffuse Interreflection. In Computer Graphics (ACM SIGGRAPH ’88 Proceedings), volume 22, pages 85–92, August 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Suykens
    • 1
  • Yves D. Willems
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceK.U. LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations