Advertisement

Efficiency Measures in Benchmarking Decision Support Systems: A Hotel Industry Application

  • Karl W. Wöber

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the applicability of Data Envelopment Analysis in an interactive benchmarking system. The decision support system which is used for this experimental study is accessible on the World Wide Web and based on data obtained from Austrian small and medium sized hotel enterprises. The system was developed with financial support of the Austrian Chamber of Commerce and is operated by the Austrian Society for Applied Research in Tourism (ASART) at the Vienna University of Economics. It enables Austrian entrepreneurs as well as consultancy companies specialising in tourism to compare the performance of hotel and restaurant enterprises with others of a similar nature. In the present paper the author gives a comprehensive description of the conceptual approach, the technical realisation and experiences and implications with the prototype version of the system.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Decision Support System Efficiency Score Data Envelopment Analysis Model Data Envelopment Analysis Efficiency Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Camp, R.C.: Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, Milwaukee: Quality Press (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spendolini, M.J.: The benchmarking book. New York: Amacom (1992).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, R.A., Morey, R.C.: The search for appropriate benchmarking partners: A macro approach and application to corporate travel management. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 22(5),477–490 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morey, R.C., Dittman, D.A.: Evaluating a hotel GM’s performance. A case study in benchmarking. Cornell Hotel and Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 30–35 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morey, M.R., Morey, R.C.: Mutual fund performance appraisals: A multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking. Omega, International Journal of Management Science,27,241–258 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siems, T.F., Barr, R.S.: Benchmarking the productive efficiency of U.S. banks. Financial Industry Studies, December 1998, 11–24 (1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charnes, A.C., Cooper, W.W. Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444 (1978).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charnes, A.C., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Seiford, L.M. (Eds.): Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, methodology, and application, Boston: Kluwer (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norman, M., Stoker, B.: Data Envelopment Analysis. The assessment of performance, Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schrage, L.E.: Optimization modeling with LINDO, 5th edition, Duxbury Pr. (1997).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wöber, K.W.: Betriebskennzahlen des österreichischen Gastgewerbes. Bilanzjahr 1997, Wien: Österreichischer Wirtschaftsverlag (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazanec, J.A.: A decision support system for optimizing advertising policy of a national tourist office. Model outline and case study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 3, 63–77 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moutinho, L., Rita, P., Curry, B.: Expert systems in tourism marketing. London: Routledge (1996).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker, P.A., Greiner, R., McDonald, D., Lyne V.: The tourism futures simulator: A systems thinking approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 14,59–67 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wöber, K.W.: TourMIS: An adaptive distributed marketing information system for strategic decision support in national, regional, or city tourist offices. Pacific Tourism Review, 2(3/4), 273–286 (1998).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yeoman, I., Ingold, A. (Eds.): Yield Management. Strategics for the service industries. London: Cassell (1997).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirk, D.: Catering technology — development of equipment and processes to increase productivity. In: Cooper, C. (Ed.): Progress in Tourism, Recreation and Hospitality Management, London: Belhaven Press, 232–241 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wöber, K.W.: Comparing operating ratios for small and medium hotel and restaurant businesses. A decision support system using Internet technology. In: Buhalis, D., Schertler, W. (Eds.): Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism (1999). ENTER 99, Proceedings of the International Conference in Innsbruck, Austria 1999, Springer: Wien — New York 1999,238–246Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Charnes, A.C., Clark, T., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B.: A developmental study of Data Envelopment Analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. Air force. In R. Thompson and R.M. Thrall (eds.) Annals of Operations Research, 2, 95–112 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl W. Wöber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Tourism and Leisure StudiesVienna University of Economics and Business Administration AustriaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations