Some Highlights of N N and 3N Studies at TUNL

  • W. Tornow
Conference paper
Part of the Few-Body Systems book series (FEWBODY, volume 12)


We report on a recent determination of the 3S1 - 3D1 mixing parameter E 1 in neutron-proton scattering between E n = 5 and 20 MeV. The results follow the trend of previous determinations at 25 and 50 MeV, thus indicating a stronger N N tensor force than predicted by N N potential models and the Nijmegen N N partial-wave analysis. In the field of 3N physics we summarize the ongoing search for an explanation of the 3N analyzing power puzzle.


Tensor Force Rigorous Calculation Tensor Analyze Power Effective Field Theory Approach Nijmegen Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V.G.J. Stoks et al.: Phys. Rev.C48, 792 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.M. Raichle et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2711 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.A. Arndt: interactive computer code SAID, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Ockenfels et al.: Nucl. Phys.A526, 109 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Henneck: Phys. Rev.C47, 1859 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Mathelitsch, B.J. VerWest: Phys. Rev.C29, 739 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Machleidt: Private CommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Schöberl et al.: Nucl. Phys.A489, 284 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Clotten et al.: Phys. Rev.C58, 1325 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.B. Kaplan, M.J. Savage, M.B. Wise: Nucl. Phys.B534, 329 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Witala, W. Glöckle, T. Cornelius: Few-Body Syst. Suppl.2, 555 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Koike, J. Haidenbauer: Nucl. Phys.A463, 365c (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Tornow et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 312 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Kievsky, M. Viviani, S. Rosati: Phys. Rev.C52, R15 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Shimizu et al.: Phys. Rev.C52, 1193 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. H. Witala: Private CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Sakamoto et al.: Phys. Lett.B367, 60 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.B. Wiringa: Private CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Glöckle et al.: Phys. Rep.274, 107 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Rühl et al.: Nucl. Phys.A524, 377 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Hüber, J.L. Friar: Private CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Kievsky: Phys. Rev.C60, 034001 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Tornow
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke University and Triangle Universities Nuclear LaboratoryDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations