An Investigation into the design of an Interface for Interaction with a Virtual Environment representing a four-dimensional object

  • R. Wellard
  • S. C. Chapman
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


Five methods of mapping the input from a six-degrees-of-freedom input device to the set of rotations available in four-dimensional space axe evaluated with respect to how well they can be used to perform four-dimensional target aquisition tasks. Also evaluated are the user’s opinions of the methods of interaction. Two of the five interaction methods perform significantly better than the rest allowing some general results to be drawn....


Virtual Reality Virtual Environment Task Difficulty Input Device Target Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abbott EA (1944) Flatland (5 ed), Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strauss C and Banchoff TF (1978) The Hypercube — Projections and slicing, Currently unavailable, see for detailsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banchoff TF (1996) Beyond the Third Dimension, Scientific American Library, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen M, Mountford SJ, Sellen A (1988) A Study in Interactive 3-D Rotation Using 2-D Control Devices, Computer Graphics, 22(4), 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    England R (1995) Sensory-motor systems in virtual manipulation, in Simulated and Virtual Realities, Carr and England, ch 7, 131–117Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gabbard JL and Hix D (1997) A Taxonomy of Usability Characteristics in Virtual Environments, available at Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Houde S (1992) Iterative Design of an Interface for Easy 3-D Direct Manipulation, CHI’92 Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3–7 May 1992, 135–142Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacob RJK and Sibert LE (1992) The Perceptual Structure of Multidimensional Input Device Selection, CHI ’92 Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3–7 May 1992, 211–218Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacob et al (1994) Integrality and Separability of Input Devices, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1), 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacKenzie IS (1995) Input Devices and Interaction Techniques for Advanced Computing, in Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, Barfield and Furness, Oxford University Press, ch 11, 437–470Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacKinlay JD, Card SK, Robertson GG (1990) A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices, Human Computer Interaction, 5, 145–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manning HP (1960) The Fourth Dimension Simply Explained, Dover Publications, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smets et al (1995) Designing in Virtual Reality: perception-action coupling and affordances, in Simulated and Virtual Realities, Carr and England, ch 9, 189–208Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wellard & Chapman (2000) An Investigation into Control Mappings for the Manipulation of Four-Dimensional Objects Represented within a Virtual Environment, EGUK 2000 Conference Proceedings, 4–6 April, 159–170Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Witmer et al (1998) Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhai S and Milgram P (1993) Human Performance Evaluation of Manipulation Schemes in Virtual Environments, IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium Proceedings, 155–161, available at Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Wellard
    • 1
  • S. C. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of WarwickConventryUK

Personalised recommendations