Advertisement

First-Person Science Inquiry ‘in the Field’

  • T. Moher
  • A. Johnson
  • Y. Cho
  • Y. Lin
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)

Abstract

In this paper we describe a class of restricted simulations, virtual ambients, designed to support science inquiry learning among elementary school students. These simulations employ large multi-user VR displays to support ‘first-person’ collaborative exploration, data collection, and the construction of support for hypotheses in simulated environments. In order to reduce the cognitive load on learners, navigation is used instead of the traditional learning simulations’ direct control of independent model variables. Users may observe phenomena in virtual environments, but cannot affect the course of the underlying simulation. We report on our early experience with second, fourth, and sixth grade students in an elementary school employing a configurable virtual ambient named ‘the Field.’

Keywords

Virtual Environment Stereo Visual Elementary School Student Sixth Grade Student Virtual Instrumentation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for Science Literacy: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Jong, T., et al. Self-directed learning in simulation-based discovery environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14, 1998, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dewey, J. Science as subject-matter and as method. Science 31 (1910), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edelson, D., Gordin, D., and Pea, R. Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 1999, 391–450.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedler, Y., Nachmia, R., and Linn, M. Learning scientific reasoning skills in microcomputer-based laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (1990), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoist, S. Directing learner attention with manipulation style. ACM CHI 96 Doctoral Consortium, Vancouver, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jackson, S., et al. Making dynamic modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments 4 (3), 1994, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loh, B., at al. The Progress Portfolio: Designing reflective tools for a classroom context, in Proceedings of CHI ‘98 (Los Angeles, CA), ACM Press, 627–634.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moher, T., Johnson, A., Cho, Y., and Lin, Y. Observation-Based Inquiry in a Virtual Ambient Environment, in Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Ann Arbor MI, June 2000), Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp. 238–245.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Research Council, National science education standards. National Research Council, Washington DC, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabak, I., and Reiser, B. Activity Attributes: Steering The Course of Dialogue in Inquiry-Based Science Classrooms. Presented at AERA 1999, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Moher
    • 1
  • A. Johnson
    • 1
  • Y. Cho
    • 1
  • Y. Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Electronic Visualization LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations