Advertisement

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

  • Nikolaus M. Boehler
Chapter

Abstract

The idea of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was first conceived by McKeever and Elliot in 1952 while doing work to develop metallic tibial plateau prostheses. In 1958, McIntosh reported (22) the use of a prosthesis with a vitallium tibial plateau.

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Component High Tibial Osteotomy Unicompartmental Knee Arthro 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Argenson J-N, O’Connor J-J: Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement: A 1–9 year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J. Bone Joint Surg., 74-B, 228–232, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blunn G.W., Joshi A.B., et al.: Polyethylene wear in unicondylar knee prostheses: Acta Orthop. Scand (1992); 63(3) 247.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Böhler N.: Surface modification of the femoral component Orthopaedics (1995) 15, 6–16.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhler N., Pastl K., Infanger A.: Uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In Morscher: Endoprosthetics (1995) Springer, 368.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohnhorst J., Bartsch H., Mueller W.: Mittelfristige Ergebnisse bei sofortbelastung des zementfreien Böhler ¡ª Monocondylarschlittens, Orthop. Praxis (1996), Kongressband B. Baden: 96.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carr A., Keyes G., Miller R, O’Connor J., Goodfellow J: Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty: A survival study of the Oxford knee. Clin Orthop., (1993); 295:205–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cartier Ph, Cheaib S: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: 2 to 10 years of follow-up evaluation. J. Arthroplasty, (1987); 2:157–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ) Cartier Ph Sanouiller J-L, Grelsamer R-P: Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty Surgery. 10 Years minikum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty, (1996); 11,7;782–788.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chesnut W.J: Preoperative diagnostic protocol to predict candidate for unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, (1991); 273:146–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodfellow J.W. Kershaw C.J, M.K, O’Connor J-J: The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), (1988); 70:692–701.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gunston F-H: Polycentric knee arthroplasty; prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J. Bone Joint Surg., (1971); 53A: 272–277.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heck D.A., Marmor L.. et al.: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin. Orthop., 286, 154, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hernigou Ph, Deschamps G. La proth¨¨se unicompartimentale du genou-Symposium SOFCOT 95, Chir Orthop, (1996), 82, Suppl. I: 25–60.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodge WA, Chandler HP Unicompartmental knee replacement: comparison of constrained and unconstrained designs. J Bone Joint Surg. (1992) AM 74:877.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Insall JN, Aglietti P: A five to seven-year follow-up unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. (1980) 62:A, 13–29.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ivarsson I, Giliquist J: Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (1989) 266: 139.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kisslinger E., Wessinghage D.: Langzeitergebnisse von 501 unikompartimentalen Schlittenprothesen des Kniegelenkes; Orthop. Praxis (1997); 33 (3) 152Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knight J.L, Atwater R.D., JIE Guo: Early failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J. Arthroplasty (1997) 12, 1: 11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson, Lidgren L: Swedish Or-thopaedic Society. Prospective multicentre study of knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand, (1994); 65(4): 375—386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T.Koshino: Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of degenerative osteoarthritic knee with more than 10 ¡ª years follow-up ¡ª Cahiers d’enseignement de la Sofcot (1997) 61: 210.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurencin C.T., Zelicof S.B., Scott R.D., Ewald F.C.: Uni-compartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: a Comparative study. Clin Orthop (1991), 273: 151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macinthos, D.L.: Hemiarthroplasty of the knee using a space occupying prosthesis for painful varus and valgus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg. (1958) A, 40: 1431.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marmor L: Result of single compartment arthroplasty with acrylic cement fixation. A minimum follow-up of two years. Clin Orthop (1977) 122: 181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. ) Marmor L: Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental desease. J Bone Joint Surg (1979) Am 61: 347.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marmor L: Lateral compartment arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop (1984), 186: 115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marmor L: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ¡ª Ten to 13 year follow-up study. Clinic. Orthop. (1988); 14–20.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moller J-T: Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of the importance of the anterior cruciate ligament. Acta Orthop. Scand., (1985); 56:120–123.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenberg T-D, Paulos L.E, Parker R.D, Coward D.B, Scott S.M: The forty-five-degree postero-anterior flexion weight bearing radiograph of the knee. J.Bone Joint Surg, (1988), 70-A: 1479 ¡ª 1483.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scott R.D, Santore R.F: Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for ostheoarthritis of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. (1981); 63-A: 536–544.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scott R.D., Cobb A.G, McQuerary F.G, Thornhill T.S: Uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty. 8 to 12 year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin orthop, (1991); 271:96–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Streicher R.M., Weber H., et al: ¡ª New surface modification for TI-TAR-7NB alloy: Oxygen diffusion hardening (ODH), Biomaterials (1991), 3, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Streicher R.M., Weber H, Schoen R, Semlitsch MF: Wear resistant couplings for longer lasting articulating total joint replacements. (1992) Adv 10/179:186.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stenström A., Lindstrand A., Lewold S.: Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty with special reference to the knee ¡ª Arthroplasty Register in Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT 61 (1997), 159.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Swank M., Stulberg S.D., et al: - The natural history of uni-compartmental Arthroplasty ¡ª Clin. Orthop. (1993), 286; 130.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thornhill T.S, Scott R.D.: Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty, Orthop Clin North (1989) Am, 20(2): 245Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wanivenhaus A., Gottsauner-Wolf F., et al: 2-to-4 year results of the cementless application of the PCA unicondylar knee prostheses- Z. Orthop. (1990) 128, 612.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Witvoet J, Peyrache M-D, Nizard R: Prostheses unicompartimental type Lotus dans le traitment des gonarthroses. Rev Chir Orthop, (1993); 79:565–576.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaus M. Boehler
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedische Abteilung LinzGermany

Personalised recommendations