Live@Web.Com — Using CBIR Technology in Interactive Web-TV

  • Felix Morsdorf
  • Stephan Volmer
Conference paper
Part of the Eurographics book series (EUROGRAPH)


The increasing amount of internet based television broadcasts has lead to new approachs to interactivity in TV programs. We developed a system which is able to supply the viewer of the program upon interaction with information relating to the program, only based on the low-level visual content of the scene. This aim is achieved by comparing signatures describing the visual content of single frames of the video with a remote database of signatures derived from known videos. The database actually links the visual information contained in the signatures to some second-level information interesting for the user. Two main problems in extending CBIR technology to videos must be overcome, one is the extraction of the visual information out of the highly redundant video material, and the other is reducing the matching time of the system enough to allow for web-based interactivity.


Visual Content Video Retrieval Video Database Video Material Matching Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aigrain, P., Zhang, H.J., Petkovic, D.: Coment-based Representation and Retrieval of Visual Media: A State-of-the-Art Review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 3(3):179–202, July 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herzog, O., Miene, A., Hennes, T., Alshuth, P.: Integrated Information Mining for Texts. Images, and Videos. Computers & Graphics, 22(6):675–685, December 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kreyß, J., Roper, M., Alshuth, P., Hennes, Th., Herzog, O.: Video Retrieval by Still Image Analysis with ImageMiner. In Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases V, vol. 3022, pp. 36–44. SPIE, San Jose, USA, February 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macer, P, Thomas, P.: Browsing Video Content. Proceedings of BCS HCI Group Conference, The Active Web, Staffordshire University, UK., January 1999Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pass, G., Zabih, R: Comparing Images Using Joint Histograms. ACM Journal of Multimedia Systems, 7(3):234–240, May 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swain, M.J., Ballard, D.H.: Colour Indexing. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 7(1): 11–32, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Volmer, S.: Tracing Images in Large Databases by Comparison of Wavelet Fingerprints. In Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Visual Information Systems, pp. 163–172, La Jolla, USA. December 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Volmer, S.: Buoy Indexing of Metric Feature Spaces for Fast Approximate Image Queries. To appear in Proc. of the 6th Eurographics Workshop on Multimedia, Manchester, UK, September 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, H.J., Kankanhalli, A., Smoliar, S.W.: Automatic Partitioning of Full Motion Video. Multimedia Systems, 1(1):10–28, June 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhuang, Y., Rui, Y., Huang, T., Mehrotra, S.: Adaptive Key Frame Extraction Using Unsupervised Clustering. In Proc. of IEEE Int’l Conf. on Image Processing, pp. 866–870, Chicago, USA, October 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Morsdorf
    • 1
  • Stephan Volmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IGDDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations