Skip to main content

Intraoperative Ultrasound Imaging: Comparison of Pathomorphological Findings in US Versus CT, MRI and Intraoperative Findings

  • Conference paper
Intraoperative Imaging in Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 85))

Abstract

Since 1987, Ultrasound (US) is performed routinely as real time navigation system in our neurosurgical practice. In 374 cases with different pathologies the preoperative CT and MRI images were compared with the intraoperative US images and the operative findings. In all instances, the lesion could be localized and described in detail. US findings correlated with the findings an CT/MRI, concerning size and shape of lesions. US allowed the differentiation of more structural details within tissue compartments. The demarcation of gliomas was not as well defined in US as compared to CT/ MRI, which correlated with the intraoperative situation. As for CT/ MRI imaging, a correlation between US findings and histopathology of the lesion was not possible. In our opinion, intraoperative US imaging is an excellent tool for localization of cerebral and medullar lesions and for detailed description of their interior. This indicates a widespread applicability of this method in neurosurgery as an anatomical link between preoperative imaging and the reality of the operative field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apuzzo ML, Sabshin JK (1983) Computed tomographie guidance stereotaxis in the management of intracranial mass lesions. Neurosurgery 12: 277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Auer LM, Van Velthoven V (1990) Intraoperative Ultrasound Imaging. Comparison of pathomorphological findings in US and CT. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 104: 84–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Auer LM, Van Velthoven V (1990) Intraoperative ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery. Comparison with CT and MR. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Black PML, Moriarty T, Alexander EA III et al (1997) Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and ist neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 41: 831–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Enzmann DR, Britt RH, Lyons BE, Buxton JL, Wilson DA (1981) Natural history of experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: sonography, computed tomography and neuropathology. AJNR 2: 517–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enzmann DR, Lyons BE, Caroll B, Placone RC, Rasor J, Britt RH, Buxton JL, Wilson DA (1982) Experimental brain abscess: enhanced sonography and pathological correlation. AJNR 3: 41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Enzmann DR, Wheat R, Marshall WH, Bird R, Murphy-Irwin K, Karbon K, Hanbery J, Silverberg GD, Britt RH, Shuer L (1985) Tumors of the central vervous system studied by computed tomography and ultrasound. Radiology 154: 393–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Golfinos JG, Fitzpatrick BC, Lawrence RS, Spetzler RF (1991) Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 28: 792–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gooding GAW, Boggan JE, Weinstein PR (1984) Characterization of intracranial neoplasms by CT and intraoperative sonography. AJNR 5: 517–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolesz FA, Shtern F (1992) The operating room of the future: report of the National Cancer Institute workshop - imaging guided stereotactic tumor diagnosis and treatment. Invest Radiol 27: 326–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly PJ, Kall BA, Goerss S, Earnest F (1985) Present and future developments of stereotactic technology. Appl Neurophysiol 48: 1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Knake JE, Chandler WF, Gabrielsen TO, Tatack JT, Gebarski SS (1984) Intraoperative sonographic delineation of low grade brain neoplasms defined poorly by computed tomography. Radiology 151: 735–739

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kollias SS, Bernays R, Marugg RA, Romanowski B, Yonekawa Y, Valavanis A (1998) Target definition and trajectory optimization for interactive MR-guided biopsies of brain tumors in an open configuration MRI system. JMRI 143–159

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reizine D, George B, Rey A, Roux FX, Riche MC, Merland JJ (1984) L’echographie peroperatoire en neurochirurgie. Ann Radiol 27: 401–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts DW, Strohbein JW, Hatch JF et al (1986) A frameless stereotactic integration of computerized imaging and the operating microscope. J Neurosurg 65: 545–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin JM, Mirfakhraee M, Duda EE, Dohrmann GJ, Brown F (1980) Intraoperative ultrasound examination of the brain. Radiology 137: 831–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin JM, Dohrmann GJ, Greenberg M, Duda EE, Beezold C (1982) Intraoperative sonography of meningiomas. AJNR 3: 305–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin JM, Quint DJ (2000) Intraoperative US versus intra-operative MR imaging for guidance during intracranial neurosurgery. Radiology 215: 917–919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schenk JE, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB et al (1995) Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 195: 805–814

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ, Kacher DF, Zamani AA, Black PM, Alexander E III, Stieg PE, Moriarty TM, Martin CA, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA (1999) Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200 cases, Radiology 211: 477–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR etal (1995) Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 197: 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Velthoven V, Auer LM (1990) Practical application of intraoperative ultrasound imaging. Acta Neurochir 105: 5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zinreich JS, Tebo SA (1993) Frameless stereotactic integration of CT imaging data: accuracy and initial application Radiology 188: 735–743

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Velthoven, V. (2003). Intraoperative Ultrasound Imaging: Comparison of Pathomorphological Findings in US Versus CT, MRI and Intraoperative Findings. In: Bernays, R.L., Imhof, HG., Yonekawa, Y. (eds) Intraoperative Imaging in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 85. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6043-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6043-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83835-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6043-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics