The debate about whether we hear through a mechanism involving a bank of bandpass filters or through a traveling-wave mechanism was settled by von Bekesy in favor of traveling waves. Experience gained in the engineering design and analysis of a silicon cochlea suggests why we may have evolved a traveling-wave mechanism for hearing: Distributed traveling-wave amplification is a vastly more efficient way of constructing a wide-dynamic-range frequency analyzer than is a bank of bandpass filters. Traveling-wave mechanisms are, however, more susceptible to parameter variations and noise. Collective gain control and an exponentially tapering set of filters can solve both of these problems; the biological cochlea implements both of these solutions. These engineering studies suggest that the biological cochlea, which is capable of sensing sounds over 12 orders of magnitude in intensity while dissipating only a few microwatts, is an extremely well-designed sensing instrument. We illustrate the engineering principles in the cochlea by demonstrating a 117-stage adaptive silicon cochlea that operates over six orders of magnitude in intensity over a 100 Hz-10 kHz frequency range while only consuming 0.5 mW of power. This artificial cochlea with automatic gain control and a low-noise traveling-wave amplifier architecture has the widest dynamic range of any artificial cochlea built to date.


Wide Dynamic Range Automatic Gain Control Interaural Time Difference Very Large Scale Integration Good Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Johnstone BM (1967) Genesis of the cochlear endolymphatic potential. Curr Top Bioenerg 2: 335–352Google Scholar
  2. Lyon RF (1998) Filter cascades as analogs of the cochlea. In: Lande TS (ed) Neuromorphic Systems Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mead CA (1989) Analog VLSI and Neural Systems, pp 179–192, 279–302, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Ruggero MA (1992) Response to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2: 449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sarpeshkar R, Delbruck T, Mead CA (1993) White noise in MOS transistors and resistors. IEEE Circuits Device 9(6): 23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sarpeshkar R, Lyon RF, Mead CA (1997) A low-power wide-linear-range transconductance amplifier. Analog Integr Circ S 13(1/2): 123–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sarpeshkar R, Lyon RF, Mead CA (1998) A low-power wide-dynamic-range analog VLSI cochlea. Analog Integ Circ S 16(3): 245–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Sarpeshkar

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations