Advertisement

Lectures on Regge Phenomenology

  • R. J. N. Phillips
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 7/1970)

Abstract

These lectures are about the comparison of Regge theory (and folklore) with experiment.The first lecture surveys the properties of Regge-pole exchange amplitudes, and the places where simple pole dominance seems to fail. The second deals with Regge cuts, various prescriptions for calculating them, and what experiments are helpful. The third is about finite energy sum rules, their use to predict high energy scattering, and some problems with asymptopia. Duality and the Veneziano model are omitted, to avoid double-counting (see Kugler’s lectures).

Keywords

Regge Pole Veneziano Model High Energy Scattering Regge Dipole Pomeranchuk Theorem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See any text-book on the subject, for example, P. D. B. Collins and E. J. Squires, Regge poles in particle physics, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol 45 (Springer Verlag, 1968)Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    V. Barger and D. Cline, Phenomenological theories of high energy scattering (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1968)Google Scholar
  3. 2a.
    N. Bali et al, Phys. Rev. 161, l450 (1967)Google Scholar
  4. 2b.
    J. S. Ball and F Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. 179, 346 (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    A. E. A. Warburton, Nuovo Cim. 32, 122 (1964)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 3.
    V. N. Gribov, Soviet Physics -JETP 16, l080 (1963)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 4.
    R. C. Arnold, Phys. Rev Letters 14, 657 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5.
    H. Harari, Phys. Rev Letters 20, 1395 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 6.
    D. R. O. Morrison, Phys Letters 22, 528 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.
    R. J. N. Phillips and W. Rarita, Phys. Rev. 139, B 1336 (1965)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.
    G. Hohler et al, Phys Letters 20, 79 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    F. Arbab and C. B. Chiu, Phys. Rev. 147, l045 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    R. J. N. Phillips and W. Rarita, Phys Letters 19, 598 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev Letters 8, 263 (1962), and proceedings of 19 62 CERN conferenceADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    V. N. Gribov and I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Phys. Rev Letters 8, 343, 412 (1962)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    P. G. O. Freund, Phys. Rev Letters 21, 1375 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 14.
    D. Cline et al, Phys. Rev Letters 23, 1318 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 15.
    P. Bonamy et al, Phys Letters 23, 50l (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 15a.
    P. Bonamy et al, and proceedings of Heidelberg conference (1967)Google Scholar
  20. 15b.
    D. Drobnis et al, Phys. Rev Letters 20, 274 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    D. M. Austin et al, Phys. Rev. 173., 1573 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 16a.
    T. J. Gajdicar and J. W. Moffat, Phys. Rev. 181, 1875 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 17.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev Letters 21, 865 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 17a.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 187, 22l0 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 18.
    M. Davier et al, preprint, SLAC-PUB-666 (1969)Google Scholar
  26. 19.
    A. P. Contogouris et al, Phys. Rev Letters 19, 1352 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 20.
    M. P. Locher and H. Rollnik, Phys Letters 22, 69 6 (1966)Google Scholar
  28. 20a.
    P. di Vecchia and F. Drago, Phys Letters 24B, 405 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 20b.
    J. P. Ader et al, Nucl. Phys. B3, 407 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 21.
    P. di Vecchia et al, Nuovo Cim. 55A, 809 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 22.
    V. Barger and L. Durand, Phys. Rev Letters 19, 1295 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 23.
    D. V. Volkov and V. N. Gribov, Soviet Phys. JETP 17, 720 (1963)Google Scholar
  33. 23a.
    E. Leader, Phys. Rev. 166, 1599 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 24.
    R. J. N. Phillips, Nucl. Phys. B2, 394 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 25.
    J. S. Ball et al, Phys. Rev Letters 20, 518 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 25a.
    P. di Vecchia et al, Phys Letters 27B, 296, 521 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 25b.
    D. P. Roy and S. Y. Chu, Phys. Rev. 171, 1762 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 26.
    G. V. Dass and C. D. Froggatt, Nucl, Phys. B8, 661 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 27.
    M. Le Bellac, Phys Letters 25B, 524 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 27a.
    F. Arbab and J. D. Jackson, Phys. Rev. 176, 179 6 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 28.
    M. Aderholz et al, Phys Letters 27B, 17 4 (1968)Google Scholar
  42. 29.
    F. Arbab and R. C. Brower, Phys. Rev. 175, 1991 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 30.
    G. Fox, G. Ringland and P. Thews, unpublished analysesGoogle Scholar
  44. 31.
    J. Froyland and D. Gordon, Phys. Rev. 177, 2500 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 31a.
    M. L. Blackmon et al, Nucl. Phys. B12, 495 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 31b.
    F. Henyey et al, Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 31c.
    J. D. Jackson and C. Quigg, Phys Letters 29B, 236 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 32.
    H. Harari, Liverpool Conference on Electron and Photon Interactions (1969)Google Scholar
  49. 33.
    V. Barger, Phys. Rev. 179, 1371 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 34.
    V. Barger and P. Weiler, Phys Letters 30B, 105 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. 35.
    Remark due to C. LovelaceGoogle Scholar
  52. 36.
    R. Carlitz and M. Kislinger, Phys. Rev Letters 24, 186 (l970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 37.
    J. V. Allaby et al, Phys Letters 30B, 498 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. 38.
    V. Barger et al, Nucl. Phys. B5, 411 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 39.
    Rosenfeld compilation, N. Barash-Schmidt et al, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, l09 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 39a.
    V. Barger and M. Olsson, Phys. Rev. 151, 1123 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 40.
    K. Foley et al, Phys. Rev Letters 11, 425, 503 (1963)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 41.
    D. Amati et al, Phys Letters 1 ,29 (1962)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 42.
    S. Mandelstam, Nuovo Cim. 30, 1127, 1148 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 42a.
    V. N. Gribov et al, Phys. Rev. 139, B185 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 42b.
    V. N. Gribov, Soviet Phys. -JETP 26, 414 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  62. 43.
    J. B. Bronzan and C. E. Jones, Phys. Rev. 160, 1494 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 44.
    D. Branson, Phys. Rev. 179, l608 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 45.
    V. N. Gribov, Leningrad preprint, report to 1966 Berkeley conferenceGoogle Scholar
  65. 46.
    D. Branson et al, Phys Letters 25B, 141 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 46a.
    R. J. N. Phillips, Phys Letters 25B, 517 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 47.
    R. J. N. Phillips, Phys Letters 24B, 342 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  68. 48.
    O. I. Dahl, Phys. Rev. 163, l430 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 48a.
    G. Belletini, proceedings of Vienna conference (1968)Google Scholar
  70. 48b.
    D. M. Dauber et al, Phys Letters 29B, 609 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. 49.
    C. Michael, Phys Letters 29B, 230 (1969) and proceedings of the 1969 Regge Cut Conference at MadisonADSGoogle Scholar
  72. 50.
    A. M. Boyarski et al, reports submitted to Liverpool Conference (1969)Google Scholar
  73. 51.
    R. C. Arnold, Phys. Rev. 153, 1523 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 52.
    S. Frautschi and B. Margolis, Nuovo Cim. 56A, 1155; 57A, 427 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 53.
    C. Lovelace, Nucl. Phys. B12, 253 (1969)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 54.
    G. Cohen-Tannoudji et al, CERN report TH-l003 (1969) make a modified K-matrix assumptionGoogle Scholar
  77. 55.
    See J. D. Jackson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 484 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 55a.
    for early references; H. D. D. Watson, Phys Letters 17, 72 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 55b.
    R. J. Rivers, Nuovo Cim. 63A,697 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 56.
    Ross, Kane, Henyey and co-workersGoogle Scholar
  81. 57.
    For a counter-argument, see D. G. Ravenhall and H. W. Wyld, Phys. Rev Letters 21., l770 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 58.
    C. B. Chiu and J. Finkelstein, Nuovo Cim. 57A, 649 (1968); 59A, 92 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 59.
    Seealso H. Abarbanel et al, Phys. Rev. 177, 2458 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 60.
    G. Cohen-Tannoudji et al, Nuovo Cim. 48, l075 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 61.
    J. Finkelstein and M. Jacob, Nuovo Cim. 56A, 681 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 61a.
    R. J. Rivers and L. M. Saunders, Nuovo Cim. 58A, 385 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 62.
    J. N. J. White, Phys Letters 27B, 92 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  88. 62a.
    F. Schrempp, Nucl. Phys. B6, 487 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 62b.
    R. C. Arnold and M. L. Blackmon, Phys. Rev. 176, 2082 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 62c.
    C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B8, 431 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 63.
    Arnold, Blackmon and co-workersGoogle Scholar
  92. 64.
    F. Henyey et al, Phys. Rev Letters 21, 946 (1968); 21, 1782 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 64a.
    F. Henyey Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 65.
    R. L. Kelly, G. L. Kane and F. Henyey, Michigan preprint (December 1969)Google Scholar
  95. 66.
    M. L. Blackmon and G. R. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. 179, l480 (1969), and Syracuse preprints SU-1206211 (1969), SU-1206218 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 67.
    M. L. Blackmon et al, Phys. Rev. 183, 1452 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 67a.
    M. L. Blackmon, Phys. Rev. 178, 2385 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 68.
    T. Roth and G. H. Renninger, Carnegie-Mellon preprint (1969)Google Scholar
  99. 69.
    A. V. Stirling et al, Phys. Rev Letters 14, 763 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 69a.
    M. Wahlig and I. Mannelli, Phys. Rev. 168, 1515 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 69b.
    O. Guisan et al, Phys Letters 18, 200 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 70.
    Test suggested by M. Ross and by F. DragoGoogle Scholar
  103. 71.
    Revised results: private communication from C. Lovelace (January, 1969)Google Scholar
  104. 72.
    D. J. Crennell et al, Phys. Rev Letters 23, 1347 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 73.
    F. Drago et al, Rutherford Laboratory preprint (in preparation)Google Scholar
  106. 74.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys Letters 29B, 676 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  107. 75.
    T. T. Chou and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 170, 1591; 175, 1832 (1968)Google Scholar
  108. 75a.
    L. Durand and R. Lipes, Phys. Rev Letters 20, 637 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 76.
    A. A. Anselm and I. T. Dyatlov, Phys Letters 24B, 479 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  110. 77.
    G. G. Beznogikh et al, Phys Letters 30B, 274 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  111. 78.
    K. S. Kölbig and B. Margolis, Phys Letters 31B, 20 (l970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  112. 79.
    R. J. Rivers, Nuovo Cim. 58A, l00 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 80.
    Emphasized by G. C. Fox, proceedings of Stony Brook Conference (1969)Google Scholar
  114. 81.
    Parameters taken from C. Michael, ref. 62Google Scholar
  115. 82.
    N. E. Booth, Phys. Rev Letters 21, 465 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 82a.
    K. Huang and S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. 174, 1915 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 83.
    A. A. Logunov et al, Phys Letters 24B, 181 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  118. 83a.
    K. Igi and S. Matsuda, Phys. Rev Letters 18, 625 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 84.
    R. Dolen, D. Horn and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev Letters 19, 402 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 84a.
    R. Dolen, D. Horn and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 85.
    Y. C. Liu and S. Okubo, Phys. Rev Letters 19, l90 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 86.
    V. A. Meshcheriakov et al, Phys Letters 25B, 341 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  123. 87.
    J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. 159, 1269 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 88.
    V. Singh, Phys. Rev. 129, 1889 (1963)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 89.
    C. Ferro-Fontan et al, Nuovo Cim. 58A, 534 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 90.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys Letters 26B, 730 (1968)ADSGoogle Scholar
  127. 91.
    B. Amblard et al, report submitted to the Lund Conference (1969)Google Scholar
  128. 92.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Madison preprint COO-262 (1970)Google Scholar
  129. 93.
    K. J. Foley et al, Phys. Rev. 181, 1775 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 94.
    W. Galbraith et al, Phys. Rev. 138, B913 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 95.
    K. J. Foley et al, Phys. Rev Letters 19, 330 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 96.
    D. Horn, Phys Letters 31B, 30 (1970)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  133. 97.
    A. Martin, CERN report TH. l075 talk at Stony Brook Conference (1969)Google Scholar
  134. 98.
    R. J. Eden, Riverside preprint UCR-34Pl07-l05; Phys. Rev. (in press)Google Scholar
  135. 99.
    G. Frye, Phys. Rev. 129, 1453 (1963)ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 99a.
    R. Kreps and J. Moffat, Phys. Rev. 175, 1942 (1968)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 99b.
    Y. Tomozawa, Michigan preprint (1969); T. Gajdicar and J. Moffat (ref. 16)Google Scholar
  138. 100.
    J. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev Letters 24, 172 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 101.
    K. Kleinknecht, Phys Letters 30B, 514 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  140. 102.
    N. W. Dean, Phys. Rev. 182, 1695 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 103.
    V. Barger and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev Letters 24, 291 (l970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 104.
    G. F. Chew and D. R. Snider, Phys Letters 31B, 75 (l970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  143. 105.
    C. Lovelace, talk at Irvine Conference (1969); CERN report TH. 1123 (l970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. N. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutherford LaboratoryChilton, BerkshireEngland

Personalised recommendations