Advertisement

Anomalies in Ward Identities

  • W. Kummer
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 7/1970)

Abstract

In certain generalized Ward-identities perturbation theory can lead to deviations from the relations, derived by canonical field theory. Such a modification caused by the fermion triangle graph in the axial-photon-vertex, was discussed in several papers during the last year. We try to show, also by means of other simple field theoretical models, that the problem of such “anomalies” is by no means solved, since the interpretation of the mathematical equations in terms of experimentally measurable (“renormalized”) quantities is still very arbitrary. E.g. sometimes only by abolishing the normal-ordering prescription “anomalies” become “normal” tadpole-contributions.

Keywords

Ward Identity Counter Term Photon Mass Axial Vector Current Equal Time Commutator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. L. Adler, Phys. Rev. 177 2426 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento 60, 47 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Takahashi, Nuovo Cimento 6, 370 (1957).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    This is essentially the situation in weak interactions. For very valuable presentation cf. A. Sirlin, Particles, Currents, Symmetries (editor P. Urban), p.353,Springer 1. Wien-New York 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    cf. e.g. statements concerning eq. (21b) in R. Jackiw “Noncanonical Behaviour in Canonical Theories” CERN prepr. 1065 (August 1969).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Källén, in “Particles, Currents, Symmetries” (ed. P. Urban) p. 268, Springer Wien-New York 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Our conventions and notations coincide with those of J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Fields, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Pauli and F. Villars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 434 (1949).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Jackiw and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 182, 1459 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. A. Brandt, Phys. Rev. 180, 1490 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    J. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. 76, 1180 (1949).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    D. G. Sutherland, Nuclear Physics B2, 433 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    M. Gell-Mann and M.Lévy, Nuovo Cimento 16, 705 (1960).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    This and other models with deviations from W.I.’s have been worked out in collaboration with M. Schweda (to be published).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Kummer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikTechnischen Hochschule WienAustria
  2. 2.Institut für HochenergiephysikÖsterreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenWienAustria

Personalised recommendations