Advertisement

Duality

  • M. Kugler
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 7/1970)

Abstract

Before starting this series of lectures on duality, I decided to look up the word duality in the dictionary, Here is how Fowler’s Modern English Usage(1) treats duality. The words dual, dualistic, are explained by: “both words are of the learned kind and better avoided when such ordinary words as two, two-fold, double, connected, divided, half and half, ambiguous will do”. In contrast to what appears in the dictionary, duality has turned out to be a fruitful and promising way to view strong interaction. It is only a few years since Dolen, Horn and Schmid(2) have proposed the idea. It is already hard to write a paper about strong interaction physics without using the subject duality.

Keywords

Regge Pole Regge Trajectory Phase Shift Analysis Local Duality Veneziano Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. W. Fowler, Modern English Usage, Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Dolen, D. Horn and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Jacob, VIII. Internationale Universitätswochen für Kernphysik, P. Urban, Editor.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Horn, ibid.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. J. Lipkin, J. D. Jackson, M. Jacob, Proceedings of the 1969 Lund Conference on Elementary Particles.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Harari, Proceedings of the Brookhaven Summer School, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Van Hove, Phys. Letters 24B, 183 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Amati, S. Fubini, A. Stanghellini, Nuovo Cimento 26, 896 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Igi and S. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 625 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 1.
    A. Logunov, L. D. Soloviev and A. N. Tavkhelodze, Phys. Letters 24 ,181 (1967), and Ref. 2.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    M. Ademollo, H. R. Rubinstein, G. Veneziano and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Letters 27B, 92 (1969) and Phys. Rev. 176, l904 (1968).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 689 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    M. Kugler, Phys. Rev. l80, 1538 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    M. Kugler, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 570 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    P. D. B. Collins, R. C. Johnson and E. J. Squires, Phys. Letters 27B, 23 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    H. Harari, Rapporteur Talk, Proceedings of the Vienna Conference.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    H. R. Rubinstein, A. Schwimmer, G. Veneziano, M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 491 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    We follow the discussion of Ref. 12 and Ref. 15.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    G. F. Chew and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1078 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    V. A. Alessandrini and E. J. Squires, Phys. Letters 27B, 300 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1395 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    P. G. O. Freund, Ibid. 20, 235 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    F. J. Gilman, H. Harari and Y. Zarmi, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 323 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    H. Harari and Y. Zarmi, Phys. Rev. 187, 2230 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    J. V. Allaby et al., Phys. Letters 30B, 500 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    R. J. N. Phillips, These proceedings.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Particle Data Group K N Compilation.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    H. Harari, Proceedings of the Liverpool Conference on Electrons and Photons.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    A. Shapira et al., Weizmann Institute preprint.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    H. W. Atherton et al., fast antiproton group, CERN preprint.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    H. Nicholson et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 603 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 31.
    We follow the discussion of reference 12.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    H. J. Lipkin, Nucl. Phys. B9, 349 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    C. N. Chiu and J. Finkelstein, Phys. Letters 27B, 576 (1968).Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 950 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 35.
    M. Kugler, Phys. Letters, to be published.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    H. J. Lipkin, Weizmann Institute preprint.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 677 (1969). C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B13, 644 (1969).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 37a.
    C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B13, 644 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 38.
    J. Mandula, J. Weyers and G. Zweig, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 266 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 562 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 39.
    J. L. Rosner, Ibid. 22, 689 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 40.
    D. J. Crennel et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 1347 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 41.
    M. Gell-Mann and G. Zweig, unpublished. Discussed in Ref. 15.Google Scholar
  45. 42.
    A. Schwimmer, Phys. Rev. 184, 1508 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 43.
    M.Kugler, Phys. Letters 31B, 372 (l970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 44.
    F. J. Gilman, Phys. Letters 29B, 673 (1969)ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 44.
    K. W. Lai and J. Louie, Paper submitted to the Irvine Conference on Regge Poles.Google Scholar
  49. 45.
    See ref. 37.Google Scholar
  50. 46.
    G. Hite, These Proceedings.Google Scholar
  51. 47.
    J. D. Jackson, Ref. 5 and Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 12 (1970). Further references are quoted in this paper.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 48.
    M. Le Bellac, Phys. Letters 25B, 524 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. 49.
    M. Kugler, Ref. 35.Google Scholar
  54. 50.
    G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 57A, l90 (1968) .ADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 51.
    A. Schwimmer, Weizmann Institute Thesis (unpublished).Google Scholar
  56. 52.
    P. P. Singh et al., Nucl. Phys. 65, 577 (1965). I thank S. S. Hanna for a discussion of his data.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 53.
    M. Kugler and M. Milgrom, Nucl. Phys. B13, 294 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 54.
    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 64A, 811 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 55.
    M. Bishari and V. Rittenberg, Weizmann Institute Preprint.Google Scholar
  60. 56.
    R. Z. Roskies, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1851 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 57.
    M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 205 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 58.
    A, Martin, Phys. Letters 29B, 431 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  63. 58a.
    K. Huang, Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 903 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 58b.
    N. F. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 23, 900 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 59.
    D. Atkinson et al., Phys. Letters 29B, 423 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 60.
    C. Lovelace, Proceedings of the ANL Conference on and K Interactions.Google Scholar
  67. 61.
    K. Kikkawa, B. Sakita and M. A. Virasoro, Phys. Rev. 184, l70l (1969).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. 62.
    G. Frye and L. Susskind, Phys. Letters 31B, 537 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. 62.
    A. Neveu and J. Sherk, Phys. Rev., to be published.Google Scholar
  70. 63.
    See, however, D. J. Gross et al., Phys. Letters 31B, 592 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. 64.
    C. Lovelace, Review talk at the Irvine Conference on Regge Poles (1970).Google Scholar
  72. 65.
    N. N. Khuri, Phys. Rev. 185, 1876 (1969).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  73. 66.
    G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Letters 31B, 138 (1970).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  74. 67.
    H. R. Rubinstein, E. J. Squires and M. Chaichian, Phys. Letters 30B, 189 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  75. 68.
    C. Lovelace, Phys. Letters 28B, 265 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  76. 69.
    M. Ademollo, G. Veneziano and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 83 (1969) .ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 70.
    P. Landshoff, These proceedings.Google Scholar
  78. 71.
    R. Carlitz and M. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 186 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 72.
    See: S. Fenster and K. C. Wali, Phys. Rev., in press. Further references are quoted there.Google Scholar
  80. 73.
    G. Altarelli and H. R. Rubinstein, Phys. Rev. 178, 2165 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kugler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nuclear PhysicsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations