Non-Polynomial Lagrangian Theories

  • Abdus Salam
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 7/1970)


Barring lepton electrodynamics, most Lagrangians of physical interest are “non-renormalizable”, the apparent non-renormalizability arising either from their non-polynomial nature or from higher spins.


External Momentum External Line Internal Line Lagrangian Theory Mixed Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    S. Okubo, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 11, 80 (1954).MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    R. Arnowitt and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. 100, 349 (1955);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. E. S. Fradkin, Nucl. Phys. 49, 624 (1963);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. V. Efimov, Soviet Phys. -JETP 17, 1417 (1963);MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Feinberg and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 131, 2724 (1963);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Güttinger, Fortschr. Phys. l4, 483 (1966);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M. K. Volkov, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 49, 202 (1968);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. H. M. Fried, Nuovo Cimento 52A, 1333 (1967);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. B. W. Lee and B. Zumino, CERN, preprint TH.1053 (1969);Google Scholar
  10. D. I. Fivel and P. K. Mitter, “A theory of weak interactions without divergences”, Univ. of Maryland preprint UMD-70–029 (1969);Google Scholar
  11. R. Delbourgo, Abdus Salam and J. Strathdee, ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/69/17, to appear in Phys. Rev. (and on renormalizability, in preparation).Google Scholar
  12. J. Boyce and J. Sultoon, Form factors in non-polynomialGoogle Scholar
  13. theories, Imperial College (in preparation).Google Scholar
  14. K. Koller, A. P. Hunt and Q. Shafi,Self-masses inGoogle Scholar
  15. chiral Lagrangian theories, Imperial College (in preparation) .Google Scholar
  16. 3).
    G. V. Efimov, CERN, preprint 1087, Oct. 1969;Google Scholar
  17. Abdus Salam and J. Strathdee, ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/69/120, to appear in Phys. Rev.Google Scholar
  18. 4).
    S. Fells (UCLA preprint) has shown that the vacuum self-energy of 3-like non-polynomial Lagrangians which areGoogle Scholar
  19. odd in powers of do not possess aGoogle Scholar
  20. lower bound. Presumably 4 -like even theories do notGoogle Scholar
  21. suffer from this objection. Our use of a mixed powerGoogle Scholar
  22. theory l/(l+f) is purely to illustrate the necessaryGoogle Scholar
  23. techniques. Physical theories (like the chiral theory) are even in field variables.Google Scholar
  24. 5).
    J. C. Polkinghorne, J. Math. Phys. 4, 503 (1963);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. P. G. Federbush and M. T. Grisaru, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 22, 263, 299 (1963);MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. J. S R. Chisholm, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 48, 300 (1952)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 6).
    D. Boulware, Seattle preprint (1969).Google Scholar
  28. 7).
    While this was being printed, Dr. 0. V. Steinmann (Zürich) has sent a preprint which shows that, for nonpolynomial theories, the scattering matrix exists in an axiomatic formulation and also that the LSZ reduction procedure can be carried through even though, for rational non-polynomial theories, strict local commutativity may possibly not hold. It appears that the quiet revolution which has been taking place with non-polynomial physics may acquire respectability yet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdus Salam
    • 1
  1. 1.International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsMiramare - TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations