Advertisement

Atomic Effects on Nuclear Reaction Yield Curves

  • R. G. Herb
Conference paper

Abstract

Non-nuclear effects that influence the shape of nuclear reaction yield curves were first studied at Wisconsin in 1959 in an attempt to check the linearity of an electrostatic analyzer when further work was planned on proton-proton scattering. The first effect studied1, 2 is a large asymmetric shift of a thick target resonance yield curve when hydrogen diatomic ions are used for bombardment. Results were explained by taking into account Coulomb repulsion between the two protons of the diatomic ion assuming that the electron is lost immediately when the ion strikes the target.

Keywords

Energy Loss Yield Curve Atomic Effect Thick Target Target Chamber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. F. Dahl, D. G. Costello, and W. L. Walters, Nuclear Phys. 21, 106 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. L. Walters, D. G. Costello, J. G. Skofronick, D. W. Palmer, W. E. Kane, and R. G. Herb, Phys. Rev. 125, 2012 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. L. Walters, D. G. Costello, J. G. Skofronick, D. W. Palmer, W. E. Kane, and R. G. Herb, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 284 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. W. Lewis, Phys. Rev. 125, 937 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 92, 328 (1953); 93, 1172 (1954).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. E. Beam, and C. H. Blanchard, to be submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Placzek, Phys. Rev. 69, 423 (1946).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. W. Palmer, J. G. Skofronick, D. G. Costello, W. E. Kane, and R. G. Herb, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 7, 301 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. — J. G. Skofronick, D. W. Palmer, D. G. Costello, A. L. Morsell, W. E. Kane, and R. G. Herb, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 7, 301 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. — D. G. Costello, W. E. Kane, A. L. Morsell, D. W. Palmer, J. G. Skofronick, and R. G. Herb, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 7; 301 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. — D. W. Palmer, J. G. Skofronick, D. G. Costello, A. L. Morsell, W. E. Kane, and R. G. Herb, Phys. Rev. 130, 1153 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 9.
    R. O. Bondelid, and J. W. Butler, Phys. Rev. 130, 1078 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    N. Bohr, Kgl. Danske Videnskab Selskab, Mat.-Fys. Medd. 18, 89 (1948).Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    J. G. Skofronick, and D. G. Costello, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 8, 320 (1963).Google Scholar
  15. — D. G. Costello (introduced by R. G. Herb), A. L. Morsell, J. G. Skofronick, and D. W. Palmer, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 8, 320 (1963); A paper covering this work to be submitted to Nuclear Physics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. G. Herb
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinMadison 6USA

Personalised recommendations