Advertisement

The Energy of Polonium Alpha Particles as Determined by Different Methods

  • Cornelius P. Browne
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper discusses the best value for the particles emitted by 210Po to be used as a standard for the measurement of nuclear reaction energies. A new value for this energy was proposed1 at The First International Conference on Nuclidic Masses in 1960. Fig. 1 shows the situation at that time. The results of a number of determinations, made by several methods, are shown. Most values are labeled with the energy standard used, i. e., 214Po, Li7(p, n)Be7 threshold, or absolute. The determination labeled “present work” was a comparison2 with the Li7(P, n) threshold made by four different methods. The figure shows that the later value was considerably higher than any of the older determinations and was, in fact, 10 keV above the then accepted value. It will be shown below that the work in various laboratories since 1960 has greatly reduced these discrepancies.

Keywords

Alpha Particle Yield Curve Lithium Metal Scattered Proton High Energy Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. P. Browne, J. A. Galey, J. R. Erskine, and K. L. Warsh, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclidic Masses, Hamilton, Toronto Press, Toronto, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. P. Browne, J. A. Galey, J. R. Erskine, and K. L. Warsh, Phys. Rev. 120, 905 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. P. Browne and T. A. Eastwood, Phys. Rev. 124, 1494 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. H. Beckner, R. L. Bramblett, G. C. Phillips, and T. A. Eastwood, Phys. Rev. 123, 2100 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. H. Briggs, Revs. Modem Phys. 26, 1 (1954).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. P. Browne, Phys. Rev. 126, 1139 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Rytz, H. H. Staub, and H. Winkler, Helv. Phys. Acta 34, 960 (1961).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Rytz, Helv. Phys. Acta 34-3, 240 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. F. Dahl, D. G. Costello, and W. L. Watters, Nuclear Phys. 21, 106 (1960) and following paper.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Murray, R. L. Graham, and J. S. Geiger, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 7, 72 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. F. Dahl, Ph. D. thesis, University of Wisconsin 1960 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. W. Newson, R. M. Williamson, K. W. Jones, J. H. Gibbons, and H. Marshals, Phys. Rev. 108, 1294 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelius P. Browne
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations