Advertisement

The Interaction between Organic Substances and Lipophilic Colloid Systems

  • H. L. Booij
  • H. G. Bungenberg de Jong
Part of the Protoplasmatologia book series (PROTOPLASMATOL., volume 1 / 2)

Abstract

Many non-reactive organic substances have a profound influence on living cells. Long ago it has been found that the action of these substances is correlated with their physico-chemical properties. Their activity increases with the surface activity or with the distribution coefficient lipid/water. In general one might say that the balance between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups in the molecule is of the utmost importance for the strength of their biological activity. As the lipids in a living cell consist—for a large part—in phosphatides and cholesterol, it would be interesting to measure the influence of non-reactive organic substances on systems built from phophatides or cholesterol. This is a rather difficult task, which has been attacked from several angles.

Keywords

Stearic Acid Organic Substance Polar Group Homologous Series Hydrophilic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Booij, H. L., 1949: Chapter XIV in Kruyt’s Colloid Science II. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. — 1949: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervales IX. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 52, 1100–1110.Google Scholar
  3. — 1952: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XVII. Rec. trav. chim. Pays-Bas 71, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — 1952: Neuere Untersuchungen über Koazervate von Seifen. Kolloid-Z. 125, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. — J. H. Blekkingh, and H. Kwestroo van den Bos, 1954: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XXI. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. B57, 340–350.Google Scholar
  6. — and H. G. Bungenberg de Jong, 1949: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates VIII. Biochim. Bioph. Acta 3, 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — and E. S. van Calcar, 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XIV. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 1169–1177.Google Scholar
  8. — H. Kwestroo van den Bos, and J. H. Blekkingh, 1954: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XX. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. B57, 215–226.Google Scholar
  9. — and A. M. van Leeuwen, 1953: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XVIII. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. B56, 255–267.Google Scholar
  10. — J. C. Lycklama, and C. J. Vogelsang, 1949: A study on the refraction of coacervates. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 52, 1006–1016.Google Scholar
  11. Booij, H. L., J. C. Lycklama, and C. J. Vogelsang, 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XII, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 407–413.Google Scholar
  12. C. J. Vogelsang — — — 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XV. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 1413–1421.Google Scholar
  13. — and P. J. van Mullem, 1951: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XVI. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. B54, 273–290.Google Scholar
  14. — and H. Veldstra, 1949: The effect of plant growth substances on coacervates. Biochim. Bioph. Acta 3, 260–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. — C. J. Vogelsang, and J. C. Lycklama, 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates X. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 59–69.Google Scholar
  16. J. C. Lycklama — — — 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XIII. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 882–890.Google Scholar
  17. — and D. Vreugdenhil, 1950: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XL. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 299–304.Google Scholar
  18. Bungenberg de Jong, H. G., and H. J. van den Berg, 1950: Elastic viscous oleate systems containing KCl VII. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. 53, 7–18.Google Scholar
  19. — H. L. Booij und G. G. P. Saubert, 1937: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate II, Protoplasma 28, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. G. G. P. Saubert — — — 1938: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate IV. Protoplasma 29, 536–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. G. G. P. Saubert — — — 1938: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate VI. Protoplasma 30, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. — and A. Recourt, 1953: Influence of organic compounds on soap and phosphatide coacervates XIX. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Amst. B56, 451–466.Google Scholar
  23. — und G. G. P. Saubert, 1937: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate I. Protoplasma 28, 498–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — — und H. L. Booij, 1938: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate III. Protoplasma 29, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. H. L. Booij — — — 1938: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate V. Protoplasma 30, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koets, P., und H. G. Bungenberg de Jong, 1938: Der Einfluß organischer Nichtelectrolyte auf Oleat-und Phosphatidkoazervate VII. Protoplasma 30, 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenthal, S., 1939: Invloed van organische niet-electrolyten op zeepcoacervaten. Thesis, Leiden.Google Scholar
  28. Veldstra, H., 1952: Researches on plant growth regulators XXI. Rec. trav. chim. Pays-Bas 71, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — and H. L. Booij, 1949: Researches on plant growth regulators XVII. Biochim. Bioph. Acta 3, 278–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag in Vienna 1956

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. L. Booij
    • 1
  • H. G. Bungenberg de Jong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical ChemistryUniversity of LeidenLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations