Advertisement

Formal Grammars and the Natural Language User: A Review

  • W. J. M. Levelt
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 256)

Abstract

General review of relations between formal grammar theory, natural linguistics and psycholinguistics.

Keywords

Word Pair Language Learning Language Acquisition Regular Language Linguistic Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Hillel, J., Perles and Shamir, On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars, Z. Phonetik Sprachwiss Kommunikationsforschung, 14, 143, 1961.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlitz Publication Staff, English: First Book, Berlitz Publications, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Bertalanffy, L. von,General System Theory, Braziller, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Bilodeau, E.A., Acquisition of skill, Academic Press, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Braine, M.D.S., On two models of internazionalization of grammars, in The Ontogenesis of Grammar. A Theoretical Symposium Slobin, D.I., Academic Press, New York,1971.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R., Psycholinguistics. Selected Papers, Free Press, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, H.W., Hierarchical ordering of phhnetic features as a function of input modality, in Ad.a.nces in Psycho-linguistics, Flores d’Arcais, G.B. and Levelt, W.J.M., Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, J.B., Research in Language teaching: the last five years, Reports of the Working Co:nittees, North east Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, M.L.A. Materials Center, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J.B. and Sapon, S.M., Moderne Language Aptitude Test, Manual, The Psychological Corporation, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.A., Three models for the description of language, IRE Transaction on Information Theory, IT-2, 113, 1956.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.A., Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague, 1957.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.A., Explanatory models in linguistics, in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Nagel, E., Suppes, P. and Tarsky, A., Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1962.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.A., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.A. and Miller, G., Introduction to the formal analysis of natural language, in Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., and Galanter, E., Eds., vol. 2, chap. I I, 1963.Google Scholar
  15. Crothers, E., and Suppes, P., Experiments in Second Language Learning, Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. Diller, K.C., Generative Grammar. Structural Linguistics and Language Teaching. Newbury, Rowley, Mass., 1971.Google Scholar
  17. Ervin-Tripp, S., An overview of theories of grammatical de velopment, in The Ontogenesis of Grammar. A theoretical Symposium, Slobin, D.I., Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Gold, E.M., Language identification, Information and Control, 10, 447, 1967.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Herriot, P., An Introduction to the Psychology of Language, Methuen, London, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Hoperaft and Ullman, S., Formal languages and their relation to automata, Reading, Addison-Wesley, USA, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Horning, J.J., A study of grammatical inference, Technical Report CS 139 Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project, Computer Science Developments, Stanford, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, S.C., Hierarchical Clustering Schemes, Psychometri ca, 32, 241, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joshi, A.K., Kosaraju, S., and Yamada, H.M., String adjunct grammars: I local and distributed adjunction, II Equa tional representation, null symbols and linguistic rele vance, Information and Control, 21, 93–235, 1972.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Krantz, D., Luce, R•D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A., Foundation of Measurement I, Academic Press, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Levelt, W.J.M., Psychological Representations of Syntactic Structures, in The Structure and Psychology of Language (in preparation). Available as Heymans Bulletin HB-6936 Ex, Department of Psychology, Groningen University, 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Levelt, W.J.M., Formele Grammaticals in Linguistick en Taalpsychologie, 3 vol., Kluwer, 1973, in English traslation, Formal grammars in linguistics and psycho-linguistics, 3 vol., Mouton, The Hague, 1974.Google Scholar
  27. Masters, J.M., Pushdown Automata and Schizophrenic Language, unpublished report, University of Sydney, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. McNeill, b., The acquisition of language. The stucy of developmental psycholinguistics, Harper and Row, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. Mesarovic, M.D., Macko D., and Takahara, Y., Theory of Hierarchical, Multilivel, Systems, Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, G.A., and Chomsky, N.A., Pattern Conception, Paper for Conference on Pattern Detection, University of Michigan, 1957.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, G.A., and Chomsky, N.A., Finitary Models of Langua ge Users, in Handbook of Mathematical Psycholog, Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., and Galanter, E., Eds., vol. 2, chap. 13, 1963.Google Scholar
  32. Newell, A., and Simon, H.A., Human Problem Solving, Englewood and Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  33. Newmark, L., and Reibel, D.A., Necessity and sufficiency in language learning, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 6, 145, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peters, P.S., and Ritchie, R.W., A note on the universal base hypothesis, Journal of linguistics, 5, 150, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters, P.S., and Ritchie, R.W. component transformational Control, 18, 483.Google Scholar
  36. Peters, P.S., and Ritchie, R.W. transformational grammars. 1973. On restricting the base grammars, Information and, On the generative power of Information Sciences, 6, 49Google Scholar
  37. Postal, P.M., Limitations of. phrase structure grammars, in The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, Fodor, J.A., and Katz, J.J., Eds., Prenti ce-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA, 1964.Google Scholar
  38. Sager, N., Syntactic Analysis of Natural Language, in Advances in Computers, Alt, F., and Rubinoff, M., Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  39. Thorne, A computer model for the perception of syntactic structure, Proc. Royal Society, B. 171, 377, 1968.Google Scholar
  40. Winograd, T., Understanding natural language, Cognitive languageana Psychology, 3, 1, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woods, Transition network grammars for natural lysis, Comm. ACM, 13, 591, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. M. Levelt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations