Advertisement

The Clinical Value of Multimodality Spinal Cord Evoked Potentials in the Prognosis of Spinal Cord Injury

  • T. Tsubokawa
Part of the Advances in Neurotraumatology book series (NEUROTRAUMATOL., volume 2)

Abstract

It is well known that there are various degrees of actual spinal cord damage among pateints diagnosed as having a clinically complete traumatic transectic spinal cord transection. It is important to ascertain the actual damaged area in such patients, and also in those with an incomplete spinal cord injury7. The recognition of the location and severity of the damaged area and its extent as related to the anatomical structure of the spinal cord is of considerable practical value to provide additional information to assist in clinical management and concerning the prognosis for the likelihood of recovery of sensory and motor disturbances, beyond what is available by careful clinical neurological examination. It also sometimes gives information to help in the selection of treatment.

Keywords

Spinal Cord Spinal Cord Injury Pyramidal Tract Acute Stage Dorsal Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bannett MA (1983) Effects of compression and ischemia on spinal cord evoked potentials. Exp Neurol 80: 508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chabot R, York DH, Watts C et al. (1985) Somatosensory evoked potentials evaluated in normal subjects and spinal cord injured patients. J Neurosurg 63: 544–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen AR, Young W, Ransohoff J (1981) Intraspinal localization of the somatosensory evoked potential. Neurosurgery 9: 157–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cusick JF, Myklebust JB, Larson SJ et al. (1979) Spinal cord evaluation by cortical evoked responses. Arch Neurol 36: 140–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorfman LJ (1977) Indirect estimation of spinal cord conduction velocity in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42: 26–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorfman LJ, Perkash I, Bosley TM et al. (1980) Use of cerebral evoked potentials to evaluate spinal somatosensory function in patients with traumatic and surgical myelopathies. J Neurosurg 52: 654–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frankel HC, Hancock DO, Hyslop G et al. (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 7: 179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levy WG, York DH (1983) Evoked potentials from the motor tracts in humans. Neurosurgery 12: 422–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy WJ, York DH, McCaffrey M et al. (1984) Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Neurosurgery 15: 287–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lueders H, Gurd A, Hahn J et al. (1982) A new technique for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function. Multichannel recording of spinal cord and subcortical evoked potentials. Spine 7: 110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mortimer JJ, Shealy CN, Wheeler C (1970) Experimental nondestructive electrical stimulation of the brain and spinal cord. J Neurosurg 32: 553–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perot PL (1976) Somatosensory evoked potentials in evaluation of patients with spinal cord injury. In: Morley TP (ed) Current controverses in neurosurgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 160 —167Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perot PL Jr (1973) The clinical use of somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal cord injury. Clin Neurosurg 20: 367–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perot PL Jr, Vera CL (1982) Scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of nerves in the lower extremities and evaluation of patients with spinal cord trauma. Ann NY Acad Sci 388: 359–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pudenz RH, Bullara LA, Jacques S et al. (1975) Electrical stimulation of the brain III: The neural damage model. Surg Neurol 4: 389–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rowed DW, McLean JAG, Tator CH (1978) Somatosensory evoked potentials in acute spinal cord injury; prognostic value. Surg Neurol 9: 203–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rowed DW (1982) Value of somatosensory evoked potentials for prognosis in partial cord injury. In: Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New York, pp 167–180Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sedgwick EM, El-Negamy E, Frankel H (1980): Spinal cord potentials in traumatic paraplegia and quadriplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43: 823–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tator CH, Rowed DW, Schwartz ML (1982) Sunnybrook cord injury scales for assessing neurological injury and neurological recovery. In: Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New York, pp 7–24Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsubokawa T, Romsay RE (1982) Evoked responses: Use in a neurological intensive care unit. In: Green BA, Marshall LF, Gallagher TJ (ed) Intensive care for neurological trauma and disease. Academic Press, New York, pp 201–215Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsubokawa T, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T et al. (1986) Clinical application of the cortico-spinal evoked potentials as a monitor of pyramidal function. Nihon Univ J Med 28: 1–6Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Hirayama T et al. (1986) Assessment of spinal cord injury with multimodality evoked spinal cord potentials. Part 1. Localization of lesions in experimental spinal cord injury. Neuro-Orthopedics I: 130–141Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamamoto T, Tsubokawa T, Hirayama T et al. (1985) Noninvasive monitoring of corticospinal evoked responses from the spinal epidural space in the cat. Nihon Univ J Med 27: 17–21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    York DH, Watts C, Raffensberger M et al. (1983) Utilization of somatosensory evoked cortical potentials in spinal cord injury: prognostic limitations. Spine 8: 832–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young W (1982) Correlation of somatosensory evoked potentials and neurological findings in spinal cord injury. In Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New York, pp 153–165Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Tsubokawa
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineNihon UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations