Asymptotic Aspects of Inclusive Production Processes

Conference paper
Part of the Acta Physica Austriaca book series (FEWBODY, volume 9/1972)


The asymptotic behaviour of multiparticle production reactions appears today as perhaps the central question of high energy hadron physics; we shall therefore begin by discussing the role of inclusive reactions for the study of this question.


Transverse Momentum Longitudinal Momentum Fragmentation Region Optical Theorem Pomeron Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. L. Good and W. D. Walker, Phys. Rev. 120, 1854 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    See e.g. G. Otter, lectures given at this meeting, for a recent review of the experimental situation, and H. Satz and K. Schilling, in Proceedings of the Colloquium on Multiparticle Dynamics, Helsinki 1971, for a review of theoretical aspects.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Benecke, T. T. Chou, C. N. Yang and E. Yen, Phys. Rev. 188, 2159 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. C. Hwa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1143 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Jacob and R. Slansky, Phys. Lett. 37B, 408 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    In this context, c.f. also L. Van Hove, In Proceedings of the Colloquium on High Multiplicity Hadronic Interactions, Paris 1971.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. D. Hansen et al., CERN-HERA 1970–2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Satz, in Proceedings of the Ecole d’Eté de Physique des Particules, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 1970.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Feynman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1415 (1969);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Feynman, in High Energy Collisions, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    K. Winter, lectures given at this meeting.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    M. Deutschmann, in Proceedings of the Amsterdam Inter- national Conference on Elementary Particles, 1971;Google Scholar
  13. J. C. Sens, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on High Energy Collisions, Oxford 1972.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    See e.g. A. Bialas, lectures given at this meeting.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Z. Koba, H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B, in press (1970);Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    E. Predazzi and G. Veneziano, CERN-TH. 1378 (1971);Google Scholar
  17. K. J. Biebl and J. Wolf, Berlin DAW preprint PHE 71–4 (1971);Google Scholar
  18. L. Caneschi, CERN-TH. 1416 (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    Z. Koba, H. B. Nielsen and P. Oleson, Phys. Lett. 38B, 25 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 16.
    H. Satz, Nuovo Cim. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    C. E. deTar, Phys. Rev. D3, 128 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 18.
    K. Wilson, Acta Phys. Austriaca 17, 33 (1963).Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    L. Van Hove, Physics Reports 1, No. 7, 347 (1971).Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    E. Fermi, Progr. Theor. Phys. (Japan) 1, 510 (1950).Google Scholar
  25. 21.
    P. P. Srivastava and G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. 110, 765 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 22.
    F. Lurcat and P. Mazur, Nuovo Cim. 31, 140 (1964).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 23.
    G. Cocconi, L. J. Koester and D. H. Perkins, UCRL10022 (1962).Google Scholar
  28. 24.
    L. Van Hove, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 655 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 25.
    A. Krzywicki, Nuovo Cim. 32, 1067 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 26.
    S. Sohlo, “Unitarity Calculation…”, U. of Jyväskylä preprint 1971.Google Scholar
  31. 27.
    D. R. O. Morrison, Phys. Rev. 165, 1699 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 28.
    E. H. de Groot and Th. W. Ruijgrok, Nucl. Phys. B27, 45 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 29.
    R. Hagedorn, CERN 71–12 (Yellow Series).Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    S. Frautschi, Phys. Rev. D3, 2821 (1972).Google Scholar
  35. 31.
    R. Hagedorn, Nuovo Cim. Suppl. 3, 147 (1965).Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    D. Amati, A. Stanghellini and S.Fubini, Nuovo Cim. 26, 896 (1962).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 33.
    A. Pignotti, Argonne Report ANL/HEP 7107 (1970).Google Scholar
  38. 34.
    I. A. Verdiev, A. M. Popova and K. A. TerMartirosyan, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 1295 (1964);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. N. F. Bali, G. Chew and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 614 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 35.
    G. Cocconi, Phys. Rev. 111, 1699 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 36.
    See e.g. J. Ellis, J. Finkelstein and R. D. Peccei, SLAC-PUB 1020 (1972).Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    A. H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D2, 2963 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 38.
    C. I. Tan, Phys. Rev. D4, 2412 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 39.
    H. P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D3, 3177 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 40.
    See e.g. K. J. Biebl, D. Bebel and D. Ebert, Berlin DAW preprint PHE 71–9 (1971).Google Scholar
  46. 41.
    C. E. deTar, K. Kang, C. I. Tan and J. H. Weis, Phys. Rev. D4, 425 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. 42.
    H. M. Chan, C. S. Hsue, C. Quigg and J. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 672 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 43.
    E. L. Berger, in Proceedings of the Colloquium on Multi-particle Dynamics, Helsinki 1971.Google Scholar
  49. 44.
    See e.g. M. S. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1585 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 45.
    H. I. Miettinen, Phys. Lett. 38B, 431 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 46.
    H. M. Chan, H. I. Miettinen,W. S. Lam, Rutherford Preprint RPP/C/42 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Satz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of BielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations