Advertisement

Radiology information system and picture archiving and communication system: interfacing and integration

  • D. Piraino

Abstract

In the past several years picture archiving communication systems (PACS) have become increasingly important to the practice of radiology, just as radiology information systems (RIS) several years ago became important to the practice of radiology. These systems now constitute the major infrastructure of electronic radiology practices. It has become increasingly apparent that these two systems need to communicate in a robust manner in order to optimize the operation of an electronic radiology department. In order for these systems to work together they must be interfaced or integrated throughout the radiology practice. The technology to do this integration has been developing rapidly over the last several years. This chapter will discuss the needs for interfacing RIS and PACS, the history of RIS and PACS interfacing, and future directions that RIS/PACS interfaces are taking.

Keywords

Hospital Information System Radiology Information System Object Management Group Common Object Request Broker Architecture DICOM Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ActiveX for Healthcare (AHC): http://www.healthcare.agilent.com/mpgawg/
  2. [2]
    Adelhard K, Nissen-Meyer S, Pistitsch C, Fink U, Reiser M (1999) Functional requirements for a HISRIS—PACS-interface design, including integration of “old” modalities. Methods Inf Med 38 (1): 1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    AHC — Initiative Overview, Microsoft Healthcare Users Group, http://mshug.org/ahc/overview.asp
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Bergstrom S, Karner G (1994) PACS—RIS interconnection: results of a feasibility study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 43 (1–2): 65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bidggod WD, alSafadi Y, Tucker Y, Prior F, Hagan G, Mattison JE (1998) The role of DICOM in an evolving healthcare computing environment: the model is the message. Journal of Digital Imaging 11 (1): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Creighton C (1999) A literature review on communication between pictures archiving and communication systems and radiology information systems and/ or hospital information systems. J Digit Imaging 12 (3): 138–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Garland HT, Cavanaugh BJ, Cecil R, Hayes BL, Lavoi S, Leontiev A, Veprauskas J (1999) Interfacing the radiology information system to the modality: an integrated approach. J Digit Imaging 12 (2 Suppl 1): 91–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hayes B (1999) A new approach to RIS/DR interconnection. Radiol Manage 21 (2): 44–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    HL7: Health Level 7: http://h17.org.
  12. [12]
    Honeyman JC (1999) Information systems integration in radiology. (1999) J Digit Imaging 12 (2 suppl 1): 218–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Horii SC (1996) A Nontechnical introduction to DICOM, National Electronic Manufactures’ Association. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Rosslyn, Va:NEMA, PS 3.11996–3. 13–1996Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Inamura K, Umeda T, Sukenobu Y, Matsuki T, Kondo H, Takeda H, Inoue M, Nakamura H, Kozuka T (1998) HIS/RIS contribution to image diagnosis and maximization of efficacy of PACS when coupled with HIS/RIS. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 57 (1–2): 41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Inamura K et al (1997) Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10 (1): 1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    IHE Year 1 documentation, RNSA: http://www.rsna.org/IHE/iheyr1/ihe_yrldocs.html
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Jagannath VJ, Wreder K, Glicksman B, alSafadi Y (1998) Objects in healthcare — focus on standards, ACM Standards ViewGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Keayes RG, Grenier L (1997) Benefits of distributed HIS/RIS—PACS integration and a proposed architecture. J Digit Imaging 10 (3 Suppl 1): 89–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kim JH, Lee DH, Choi JW, Cho HI, Kang HS, Yeon KM, Han MC (1998) Three-tiered integration of PACS and HIS toward next generation total hospital information system. Medinfo 9 Pt 2: 1086–1090Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kondoh H, Washiashi T, Sasagaki M, Arisawa J, Nakamura H, Inamura K (1998) Development and evaluation of PC-based HIS—RIS—modality—PACS coupling: the results of evaluation of initial state with personal computer application. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 57 (1–2): 63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kotter E, Langer M (1998) Integrating HIS—RIS—PACS: the Freiberg experience. Eur Radiol 8 (9): 1707–1718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kotter E, Langer MI (1998) Integrating HIS—RISPACS: the Freiburg experience. Eur Radiol 8 (9): 1707–1718. ReviewGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kroger M, Nissen-Meyer S, Wetekam V, Reiser M (1999) [Economic effects of integrated RIS—PACS solution in the university environment]. Radiologe 39 (4): 260–268 (German)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Martens FJ et al (1993) HI8PIN — a generic HIS/RISPACS interface based on clinical radiodiagnostic procedures. Eur J Radiol 17 (1): 38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Mosser H, Urban M, Durr M, Ruger W, Hruby W (1992) Integration of radiology and hospital information systems (RIS,HIS) with PACS: requirements of the radiologist. Eur J Radiol 16 (1): 69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Object Managemant Group (OMG): http://www.omg.org
  28. [28]
    Offenmuller W (1997) Expectations and solutions for HIS/RIS/PACS dataflow and workflow. J Digit Imaging 10 (3 Suppl 1): 95–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Glasser D (1998) Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Radiology 207 (2): 481–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Shook KA, O’Neall D, Honea R (1998) Challenges in the integration of PACS and RIS databases. J Digital Imaging 11 (3 suppl 1): 76–79Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Shook KA, O’Neall D, Honea R (1998) Challenges in the integration of PACS and RIS databases. J Digit Imaging 11 (3 Suppl 1): 75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Kondo H, Inoue M, Kondo H, Taked I, Miyabe 5 (1995) System design and implementation of HIS, RIS, and PC-based PACS at the Osaka University Hospital. Medinfo 8 Pt 1: 430–433Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Piraino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations