Flat panel detectors — closing the (digital) gap in chest and skeletal radiology

  • K. J. Reiff


In the radiological department today the majority of all X-ray procedures on chest and skeletal radiography is performed with classical film-screen-systems.

Using digital luminescence radiography (DLR or CR, which stands for computed radiography) as a technique has shown a way to replace this 100 year old procedure of doing general radiography work by acquiring the X-rays digitally via phosphor screens. But this approach has faced criticism from lots of radiologists world wide and therefore hasn’t been widely accepted except in the intensive care environment.

A new technology is now rising based on the use of so called flat panel X-ray (FD) detectors. Semiconducting material detects the X-rays in digital form directly and creates an instantaneous image for display, distribution and diagnosis. This ability combined with a large field of view and — compared to existing methods — excellent detective quantum efficiency represents a revolutionary step for chest and skeletal radiography and will put basic X-ray-work back into the focus of radiological solutions.

This paper will explain the basic technology of flat panel detectors, possible system solutions based on this new technology, aspects of the user interface influencing the system utilization and versatility as well as the possibility to redefine the patient examination process for chest and skeletal radiography.

Furthermore the author discusses limitations for the first released systems, upgrades for the installed base and possible scenarios for the future, e.g. fluoroscopy or angiography application.


Amorphous Silicon Flat Panel Detector Detective Quantum Efficiency Cesium Iodide Digital Radiography System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Busch HP (1997) Digital radiology for clinical applications. European Radiology (3) (Suppl): 566–572Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhao W, Rowlands JA (1995) X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. Med Phys 22: 1595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Antonuk LE, Boundry J, Huang W et al (1992) Demonstration of megavoltage and diagnostic X-ray imaging with hydrogenated amorphous silicon arrays. Med Phys 19: 1455–1466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Antonuk LE, Yorkston J, Huang W et al (1995) A real-time, flat panel amorphous silicon, digital X-ray imager. Radiographics 15: 993–1000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Chabbal J, Chaussat C, Ducourant T et al (1996) Amorphous silicon X-ray image sensor. Medical Imaging. 1996: Physics of Medical Imaging. Prod SPIE 2708: 499–510Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chaussat C, Chabbal J, Ducourant T et al (1998) New superior Csl/a-Si 43 cm x 43 cm X-ray flat panel detector for general radiography provides immediate direct digital output and easy interfacing to digital radiography systems. In: Lemke HU (ed) Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery CAR’98. Elsevier, Amsterdam 3–8Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Antonuk LE, EI-Mohri Y, Siewerdsen JH et al (1997) Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. Med Phys 24 (1): 51–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Neitzel U (1997) Integrated Digital Radiography with a Flat Electronic Detector. MedicamundiGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Michael Strotzer et al (1998) Clinical Application of a Flat-Panel X-Ray Detector Based on Amorphous Silicon Technology: Image Quality and Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in Skeletal Radiography AJR 171: 23–27, 0361–803X/98/1711–23 © American Roentgen Ray SocietyGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Piraino DW et al (1999)
    Selenium-Based Digital Radiogrphy Versus Conventional Film-Screen Radiography of the Hands and Feet: A Subjective Comparison. AJR 172: 177–184, © American Roentgen Ray Society; AJR: 172, January 1999Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hamers S, Freyschmidt J (1998) Digital radiography with an electronic flat-panel detector: first clinical experience in skeletal diagnostics. Medicamundi 42 (3)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Shaber GS, Lee DL, Bell J et al (1998) Clinical evaluation of a full field digital projection radiography detector. SPIE 336: 463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Yamazaki T, Morishita M, Kaifu N et al (1998) Development of Digital Radiography System, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition CAR’98, pp 536–541Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hintze A, Maack I, Neitzel U (1998) Digital Projection Radiography with a Full Size Flat Panel Detector Bucky System, Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium and Exhibition CAR’98, pp 9–14Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Völk M, Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J et al (1997) Flatpanel X-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology: reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies. Invest Radio[32: 373–377Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Völk M et al (1998) Clinical Application of Flat-Panel X-Ray Detector Based on Amorphous Silicon Technology: Image Quality and Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in Skeletal Radiography. America Journal of Roentgenology 171: 23–27Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Strotzer M, Völk M, Spahn M, Fründ R, Seitz J, Spies V, Gmeinwieser J, Alexander J, Feuerbach S (1997) Amorphous silicon (a-Si), flat-panel, X-ray detector versus screen-film radiography (SFR): Effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone lesions and fractures. ECR’97 — 10th European Congress of Radiology: Scientific Programme and Abstracts 205, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Aichinger H, Staudt F, Kuhn H (1992) Multiline grids for imaging in diagnostic radiology — a physical and clinical assessment. Electromedica 60 (3): 74Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Siegel E, Flagle C, Reiner B et a[(1998). Cost benefit analysis of filmless operation. Presented at annual meeting of American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, JuneGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Schiebel U, Conrads N, Jung N et al (1994) Fluoroscopic X-ray imaging with amorphous silicon thin-film arrays. Medical Imaging 1994: Physics of Medical Imaging 1994: Physics of Medical Imaging. Proc SPIE 2163: 129–140Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Chabbal J, Chaussat C, Ducourant T, Fritsch L, Michailos J, Spinnler V, Vieux G, Arques M, Hahm G, Hoheisel M, Horbaschek H, Schulz R, Spahn M (1996) Amorphous Silicon X-Ray Image Sensor. SPIE 2708: 499CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Reiff
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens AGForchheimGermany

Personalised recommendations