Practical aspects of computed radiography (CR)

  • G. Pärtan


Technical principles and historical aspects of CR are treated in chapter 3.2.3 (digital radiology in chest imaging) respectively have been described elsewhere [1].


Compute Radiography Imaging Plate Digital Radiography Image Dose Edge Enhancement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H (1983) Computed radiography utilising scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148: 833–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Center for Devices and Radiological Health (1999) Radiological Compliance Guidance — Mammography Facility Survey and Medical Physicist Qualification Requirements Under MQSA, Attachment B; Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Schönhofen H, Arnold W, Hess T, Allgayer B (1998) Digitale Mammographie: Erfahrungen bei klinischer Anwendung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 169 (1): 45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cowen AR, Parkin GIS, Hawkridge P (1997) Direct digital image acquisition. Eur Radiol 7: 918–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hogge JP, Freedman MT (1997) Storage Phosphor digital mammography. Semin Roentgenol 18 (1): 50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pisano ED (2000) Current status of full-field digital mammography. Radiology 214: 26–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Braunschweig R, Klose HJ, Neugebauer E, Busch HP (1997) Digital radiography — results of a survey (part A) and a consensus conference (part B) Eur Radiol 7 (Suppl 3): S94 — S101Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M (1997) Storage phosphor radiography. Eur Radiol (Suppl 3 ) S58 — S65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bradford CD, Peppler WW, Dobbins JT III (1999) Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system. Med Phys 26 (1): 27–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Workman A, Cowen AR (1992) Exposure monitoring in photostimulable phosphor computed radiography. Rad Prot Dosim 43 (1–4): 135–138Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Dobbins JT Ill, Ravin CE (1993) Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. Radiology 186: 395–398Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dobbins JT Ill, Rice JJ, Beam CA, Ravin CE (1992) Treshold perception performance with computed and screeen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography. Radiology 183: 179–187Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Schaefer CM (1992) Digital Radiography in chest disease. In: Greene RE, Oestmann JW (eds) Computed digital radiography in clinical practice. Thieme, New York, pp 72–101Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Shaw CC, Wang T, Gur D (1994) Effectiveness of anticatter grids in digital radiography — a phantom study. Invest Radiol 29 (6): 636–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Volpe JP, Storto ML, Andriole KP, Gamsu G (1996) Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third-generation computed radiography system. AJR 166: 653–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM (1997) Digital image processing. Eur Radiol 7 (Suppl 3): S73 — S82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Prokop M, Schaefer C, Oestmann JW, Galanski M (1993) Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 187: 521–526PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Pärtan
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiology departmentDanube HospitalViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations