A view to the past of the future — A decade of digital (r)evolution at the Danube hospital

  • W. Hruby
  • A. Maltsidis


Clinical experiences in digital radiology including intra- and interhospital communication have been documented in literature since the late eighties. The world’s first strictly-digital radiology system was planed in 1988 and implemented in 1992 in the Danube Hospital at the Socio Medical Care Center East of the city of Vienna (SMZO). The objectives of this project were firstly to overcome inherent problems of film-based systems, e.g. the loss of films, as well as to improve the efficiency and speed of patient data management, image acquisition, image distribution, archiving and reporting. The implementation of an integrated digital radiology system was expected to improve the quality of research and patient care and to support administrative tasks in connection with radiology and hospital information management systems (RIS,HIS), thus improving the efficiency not only of the radiology department but of the whole hospital.


Radiology Department Radiology Information System Digital Archive Digital Network Digital Radiology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Adelhard K, Nissen-Meyer S, Pistitsch C, Fink U, Reiser M (1999) Functional requirements for a HISRIS—PACS-interface design, including integration of “old” modalities. Methods Inf Med 38 (1): 1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Allison DJ, Martin NJ, Reynolds RA, Strickland NH (1994) Clinical Aspects of PACS. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Radiology. Tan L, Siev E (eds) Singapore 813–819Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Allison DJ, Faulkner JJ, Glass HI, Mosley J Reynolds RA (1994) “PACS” at the Hammersmith — the implementation of a clinically orientated system. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical InformaticsGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB et al (1990) The digital image workstation. Radiology 176: 303–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bauman RA, Gell G, Dwyer SJ III (1996) Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world. Part 1. J Digit Imaging 9: 99–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bick U, Lenzen H (1999) PACS: the silent revolution. E u r Radiol 9: 1152–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bidggod WD, alSafadi Y, Tucker Y, Prior F, Hagan G, Mattison JE (1998) The role of DICOM in an evolving healthcare computing environment: the model is the message. J Digit Imaging 11 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Chabbal J, Chaussat C, Ducourant T, Fritsch L, Michailos J, Spinnler V, Vieux G, Arques M, Hahm G, Hoheisel M, Horbaschek H, Schulz R, Spahn M (1996) Amorphous Silicon X-ray Image Sensor. SPIE 2708: 499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Fiedler V (1997) Do HIS, RIS and PACS increase the efficiency of interdisciplinary teamwork? In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K (eds) Computer-assisted radiology and surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 504–510Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hruby W, Mosser H, Urban M, Rüger W (1992) The Vienna SMZO-PACS project: the totally digital hospital. European Journal of Radiology 16: 66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Huang HK (1992) Three methods of implementing a picture archiving and communication system. Radiographics 12: 131–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Huang HK (1996) PACS, Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in Biomedical Imaging. VCH Publishers, New York (NY )Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Inamura K et al (1997) Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 10 (1): 1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Jakob R, Northrup S, Schmidt H (1998) Improving Workflow with Integrated RIS—PACS Solutions. The generic, rule-based workflow engine, Proceedings CAR’98Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kumpan W, Karnel F, Nics G (1999) 18 Month Experience with an Integrated Radiology System: HISRIS-SPEECH—PACS, CARS’99: 524–528Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Mosser H, Urban M, Dürr M, Rüger W, Hruby W (1992) Integration of radiology and hospital information systems with PACS: requirements of the radiologist. European Journal of Radiology 16: 69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Mosser H, Urban M, Hruby W (1994) Filmless digital radiology — feasibility and 20 month experience in clinical routine. Med Inform 19 (2): 149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Peer S, Vogl R, Seykora P et al (1998) Erste Erfahrungen mit dem unfallradiologischen PACS-Projekt an der Innsbrucker Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 169: 459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Peer S, Vogl R, Peer et al (1999) Sophisticated HIS RIS PACS integration in a large scale traumatology PACS. J Digit Imaging 12: 99–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Peters PE, Dykstra DE, Wiesmann W, Schluchtermann J, Adam D (1992) Cost comparison between storage-phosphor computed radiography and conventional film-screen radiography in intensive care medicine. Radiologe 32: 536–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Piraino DW et al (1999) Selenium-Based Digital Radiogrphy Versus Conventional Film-Screen Radiography of the Hands and Feet: A Subjective Comparison. AJR 172: 177–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Redfern R, Horii SC, Feingold E et al (1999) Experience with radiology workflow and PACS: effects on technologist and radiologist task times. Proc SPIE 3662: 307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A et al (1996) Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions. Radiology 201: 45–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Schiebel U, Conrads N, Jung N et al (1994) Fluoroscopic X-ray imaging with amorphous silicon thin-film arrays. Medical Imaging 1994, Proc SPIE 2163: 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Siegel EL, Kolodner RM (1999) Filmless Radiology. Springer, New York (NY )Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Strickland NH (1996) Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. Department of Imaging, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital London, UK. Br J Radiol 69 (828): 1089–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Strotzer M et al (1998) Clinical Application of a Flat-Panel X-ray Detector Based on Amorphous Silicon Technology: Image Quality and Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in Skeletal Radiography AJR 1 71: 23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Völk M et al (1998) Clinical application of Flat-Panel X-ray Detector Based on Amorphous Silicon Technology: Image Quality and Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in Skeletal Radiography. American Journal of Roentgenology 171: 23–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Van Bemmel JH, Musen MA (eds) (1997) Handbook of Medical Informatics. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Van Gennip EM, Ennning J, Fischer F, Glaser KH, Kilbinger M, Klose KJ, List Hellwig E, Van der Loo R, Rechid R, Van den Broeck R, Wein B (1996) Guidelines for cost-effective implementation of picture archiving and communication systems. An approach building on practical experiences in three European hospitals. Int J Biomed Comput 43: 161–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Hruby
    • 1
  • A. Maltsidis
    • 2
  1. 1.Danube HospitalViennaAustria
  2. 2.Siemens AG Austria, MED SHSViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations