• Meribeth A. Bunch


Singing is a unique way of communicating the ideas and emotions of writers and poets. The performer who cannot articulate the words of a song so that they are understood has defeated the whole purpose of his art (unless he is singing one of the rare songs without words). The specific way of articulating sounds varies from language to language. Therefore a careful study of all the languages to be sung is important, especially since no one cares to hear his own language pronounced poorly, even by foreigners. In addition, since movements of articulatory structures like the tongue, lower jaw, soft palate and lips directly influence the shape of the resonator, faulty diction and inefficient articulation inevitably impoverish tonal quality.


Soft Palate Hyoid Bone Intrinsic Muscle Vowel Sound Medial Pterygoid 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abercrombie D (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Assman PF, Nearey T, Hogan J (1982) Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual and acoustic aspects. J Acoust Soc Am 71: 975 - 989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atal BS (1983) Speech coding: recognising what we do not hear in speech. Ann NY Acad Sci 405: 18 - 32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer T, Gore JC, Boyce S, Nye PW (1987) Application of MRI to the analysis of speech production. Magn Reson Imaging 5 (1): 1 - 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer T, Gore JC, Gracco LC, Nye PW (1991) Analysis of vocal tract shape and dimensions using magnetic resonance imaging: vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 90 (2, Pt 1) 799 - 828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bairstow EC, Greene HP (1945) Singing learned from speech. London: Macmillan Benson D (1972) Roentgenographic cephalometric study of palatopharyngeal closure of normal adults during vowel phonation. Cleft Palate J 9: 43 - 50Google Scholar
  7. Bohme G, Sram F, Kalvodova E (1966) Electromyographic studies on the behavior of the levator and tensor veli paltini muscles during breathing and during phonation of vowels (preliminary report). Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 18: 9 - 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coffin R Berton (ed) (1964) Phonetic readings of songs and arias. Boulder: Pruett Press Crystal D (1981) Clinical linguistics (Disorders of human communication, vol 3 ). Wien NewYork: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodding J (1979) An intensive course in voice production and speech training (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  10. Fucci D, Crary MA, Warren JA, Bond ZS (1977) Interaction between auditory and oral sensory feedback in speech regulation. Percept Mot Skills 45: 123 - 129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gattey CN (1979) Queens of song. London: Barrie and JenkinsGoogle Scholar
  12. Harshman R, Ladefoged P, Goldstein L (1977) Factor analysis of tongue shapes. J Acoust Soc Am 62 (3): 693 - 707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henningsson G, Isberg A (1991) A cineradiographic study of velopharyngeal movements for deviant versus non-deviant articulation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28 (1): 115 - 117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Phonetic Association (1979) The principles of the International Phonetic Association. London: University CollegeGoogle Scholar
  15. Kent R, Netsell R (1971) Effects of stress contrasts on certain articulatory parameters. Phonetica 24: 23 - 44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klatt DH, Stevens KN, Mead J (1968) Studies of articulatory activity and airflow during speech. Ann NY Acad Sci 155: 42 - 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kockritz H (1965) Language orientation. An introduction to the pronounciation of foreign languages based upon the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cincinnati: Privately publishedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuhn GM (1975) On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 58: 428 - 433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labov W (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Ladefoged P ( 1962 ) Elements of acoustic phonetics. Chicago: The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladefoged P (1975) A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Leanderson R ( 1972 ) On the functional organization of facial muscles in speech. From theGoogle Scholar
  21. Departments of Otolaryngology and Clincal Neurophysiology, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenhardt ML, Skellett R, Wang P, Clarke AM (1991) Human ultrasonic speech perception. Science 253 (5015): 82 - 85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lieberman P (1977) Speech physiology and acoustic phonetics: an introduction. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindeman DE, Moore RN (1990) Measurement of intraoral muscle forces during functional exercises. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97 (4): 289 - 300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowe AA, Sessle BJ (1973) Tongue activity during respiration, jaw opening and swallowing in cats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 51: 1009 - 1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lubker JF (1968a) An electromyographic-cinefluorographic investigation of velar function during normal speech production. Cleft Palate J 5: 1 - 18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lubker JF, Morris H (1968b) Predicting cinefluorographic measures of velopharyngeal opening from lateral still X-ray films. J Speech Hear Res 11: 747 - 753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marshall M (1953) The singer's manual of english diction. New York: G Schirmer Miller R, Schutte H (1981) The effect of tongue position on spectra in singing. The NATS Bull 37: 26 - 34Google Scholar
  29. Moon JB, Jones DL (1991) Motor control of velopharyngeal structures during vowel production. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28 (3): 267 - 273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moriarty J (1975) Diction Boston: EC Schirmer MusicGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman RA, Emanuel FW (1991) Pitch effects on vowel roughness and spectral noice for subjects in four musical voice classifications. J Speech Hear Res 5: 753Google Scholar
  32. Nittouer S, McGowan RS, Milenkovic PH, Beehler D (1990) Acoustic measurements of men's and women's voices: a study of context effects and covariation. J Speech Hear Res 33 (4): 761 - 775Google Scholar
  33. Russell G (1928) The vowel, its physiological mechanism as shown by x-rays. Columbus: The Ohio State University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryan J (1968) Phonetics and radiology. Australian Radiol 12: 18 - 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scotto di Carlo N (1979) Perturbing effects of overarticulation in singing. J Res Sing 2: 1027Google Scholar
  36. Scripture EW (1906) Researches in experimental phonetics: the study of speech curves. Washington, DC: Carnegie InstitutionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sovijarvi J (ed) (1962) Proc of the IVth Int Cong of Phonetic Science, Helsinki, September 4-9, 1961. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
  38. Triplett WM (1967) An investigation concerning vowel sounds on high pitches. NATS Bull 23, 3: 6-8, 50Google Scholar
  39. Tuller B, Fitch HL (1980) Preservation of vocal tract length in speech. A negative finding. J Acoust Soc Am 67 (3): 1068 - 1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uris D (1971) To sing in English. New York: Boosey and HawkesGoogle Scholar
  41. Wise CM (1957) Applied phonetics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood S (1986) The acoustical significance of tongue, lip and larynx manoeuvres in rounded palatal vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 80 (2): 391 - 401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meribeth A. Bunch
    • 1
  1. 1.LondonEngland

Personalised recommendations