Towards a clinically specific profile of severe senile primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer type (PDDAT)

  • H. Stuckstedte
  • C.-M. Abrahams
  • G. Ulmar
Part of the Key Topics in Brain Research book series (KEYTOPICS)


DSM-III-R-criteria for diagnosis, type, and degree of dementia are applied to 65 psychogeriatric in-patients.

In order to establish a clinically valid profile for PDDAT the degree of severity as well as the distinction from other types of dementia are taken into consideration. This two-dimensional approach to PDDAT seems to account better for the complexity of its clinical phenomenology. Patients with severe PDDAT are compared with a moderate PDDAT-group as well as a severe MID-group.


Specific Profile Equivalent Degree Partial Score Presenile Dementia Cerebral Grey Matter 

Abbreviated Heading


The AGP System (Guy et al., 1985)


Dementia Scale (Blessed et al., 1968)


Depression Status Inventory (Zung, 1972)


Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edi tion, Revised (American Psychiatric Association, 1987)


Information-Memory-Concentration Test (Blessed et al., 1968)


Ischemic Score (Hachinski et al., 1975)


Multi-infarct Dementia


Mini-Mental State (Folstein et al., 1975)


Primary Degenerative Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DSM III-R)


significance: p < 0.001


significance: p < 0.01


significance: p < 0.05


tendency: p < 0.10


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn (revised). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M (1968) The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry 114: 797–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brun A, Gustafson L (1988) Zerebrovaskuläre Erkrankungen. In: Kisker KP, Lauter H, Meyer J-E, Müller C, Strömgren E (Hrsg) Psychiatrie der Gegenwart 6. Organische Psychosen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 253–295Google Scholar
  4. Erkinjuntti T, Hokkanen L, Sulkava R, Palo J (1988) The Blessed dementia scale as a screening test for dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 3: 267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189–198Google Scholar
  6. Gustafson L, Nilsson L (1982) Differential diagnosis of presenile dementia on clinical grounds. Acta Psychiatr Scand 65: 194–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guy W, Ban TA (1985) The AGP system. Manual for the documentation of psychopathology in gerontopsychiatry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  8. Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, Du Boulay GH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Ross Russell RW, Symon L (1975) Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 32: 632–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lauter H, Kurz A, Haupt M, Romero B, Zimmer R (1989) Clinical diagnosis of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a comparative validation of current diagnostic criteria. J Neural Transm (P-D Sect) 1: 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34: 939–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reisberg B (1986) Dementia: a systematic approach to identifying reversible causes. Geriatrics 41: 30–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zung WWK (1972) The depression status inventory: an adjunct to the self-rating depression scale. J Clin Psychol 28: 539–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Stuckstedte
    • 1
  • C.-M. Abrahams
    • 1
  • G. Ulmar
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychiatrisches LandeskrankenhausWieslochFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations