Essence and “Appearance”
From the foregoing considerations we have gained the insight that the area of the real is not to be identified with the area of the “given”. It most certainly extends much farther. Our critique of attempts to establish this identification did not have simply a negative character. Every argument directed against such efforts was at the same time a proof of the existence of realities that are not given, that transcend consciousness.
KeywordsReal Thing Perceptual Image Foregoing Consideration Transcendent Reality Mental Reality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- *.The term ‘phenomenalism’ here is of course used in a sense quite different from that found in Anglo-American philosophy. [Translator’s note.]Google Scholar
- 34.The word ‘phenomenalism’ is not always used in the same sense. For example, Hans Kleinpeter (in his work Der Phänomenalismus) uses the term to designate philosophical currents that we have just criticized in §§ 25 and 26.Google Scholar
- 35.This is acknowledged likewise by many modern criticists; for example, see R. Hönigswald, Beiträge zur Erkenntnistheorie und Methodenlehre (1906), pp. 115 ff. Petzoldt (Weltproblem, p. 190) seems, in his criticism of the above passages, to have overlooked the fact that there I was describing not my own viewpoint but that of phenomenalism.Google Scholar