Advertisement

Active and Hybrid Control Development in Japan

Experiments and Implementation
  • H. Iemura
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 345)

Abstract

In this chapter, recent developments in active and hybrid control techniques is reviewed by introducing experimental projects and some implementations being conducted in Japan. Active and hybrid control techniques are categorized into AMD (active mass damper), ATMD (active tuned Mass Damper), AB (active brace), AVS (active variable stiffness), A VD (active variable damper) and ABI (active base isolation). Shaking-table tests of flexible frame models with TMD, AMD, and ATMD at Kyoto University are also introduced.

Keywords

Shake Table Test Tune Mass Damper Control Development Active Control Force Mode Frequency Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aizawa, S., et al (1990). “Experimental study of dual axis active mass damper,” Proc., U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, Oct., U.S.C., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  2. Fujii, S., et al (1992). “Hybrid isolation system using friction-controllable sliding bearings,” Trans., Japan National Symposium on Active Structural Control, March, (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  3. Fujita, T., et al (1992). “Study of biaxially controlled mass damper with convertible active and passive modes,” Trans., Japan National Symposium on Active Structural Control, March, (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. Iemura, H., et al (1990). “Phase-adjusted Active Control of Structures with Identification of Random Earthquake Ground Motion ,” Proc. U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, Nov., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  5. Iemura, H., et al (1990). “ Comparison of Passive, Active and Hybrid Control Techniques on Earthquake Response of Flexural Structures — Numerical Simulations and Experiments,” ProC., U.S.-Italy-Japan Workshop/Symposium on Structural Control and Intelligent Systems, July, Sorrento.Google Scholar
  6. Kageyama, M., et al (1992). “Study on super quake free control system of buildings,” Trans. Japan National Symposium on Active Structural Control, March. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Kawashima, K., et al (1991). “Current research efforts in Japan for passive and active control of highway bridges against earthquakes,” Proc. 23rd Joint Meeting, U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, UJNR, May, Tsukuba.Google Scholar
  8. Kitamura, H., et al (1992). “Design and analysis of a tall building with active mass damper,” Proc. 10WCEE, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  9. Kobori, T., et al (1990). “State-of-the-Art of Seismic Response Control Research in Japan,” Proc. U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, Nov., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  10. Kobori, T., et al (1990). “Study on active mass driver (AMD) system — active seismic response controlled structure,” 4th World Congress of Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Nov., Hongkong.Google Scholar
  11. Kobori, T., et al (1990). “Experimental study on active variable stiffness system — active seismic response controlled structure,” 4th World Congress of Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Nov., Hongkong.Google Scholar
  12. Koshika, N., et al (1992). “Control effect of active mass driver system during earthquakes and strong winds,” Trans. Japan National Symposium on Active Structural Control, March (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Matsumoto, T., et al (1990). “Study on powered passive mass damper for high-rise building,” Proc. AIJ Annual Meeting, Oct. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Reinhorn, A. and Soong, T.T. (1990). “Full scale implementation of active bracing for seismic control of structures,” Proc. U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, Oct., U.S. C., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  15. Suzuki, T., et al (1990). “Active vibration control for high-rise buildings using dynamic vibration absorber driven by servo motor,” Proc. U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, Oct., U.S. C., Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  16. Tamura, K., et al (1992). “Study on application of hybrid mass damper system to a tall building,” Trans., Japan National Symposium on Active Structural Control, March. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Tanida, K.,et al (1990). “Development of hybrid-type mass damper combining active-type with passive-type,” ProC., Dynamics and Design Conference, July, Kawasaki. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Yahagi, K. and Yoshida, K. (1985). “An active control of traffic vibration on the urban viaducts,” ProC., JSCE, No.356/I-3, April. (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Iemura
    • 1
  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations