Interpretation of Experimental Observations

  • Tatiana V. Bazhenova
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 37)


The temperature and pressure measurements show that there is an additional pressure region behind the foot of the slip-stream. It is obvious that for double Mach reflection with the second shock wave (Fig. 1 a) the pressure and temperature in the region 6 behind the secondary shock wave RS is expected to rise. But the additional steps in pressure and temperature traces were observed to exist not only in the case (Fig. 1 a), but also in the case of Mach pattern without the second triple point (Fig. 1 b). In air, the second pressure increase was observed at incident shock velocities greater than 900 m/sec and the second temperature rise at the velocity of about 630 m/sec


Heat Flux Shock Wave Mach Stem Mach Reflection Compression Region 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Gvozdeva L.G., Bazhenova T.V., Predvoditeleva O.A. and Fokeev V.P., Mach Reflection of Shock Waves in Real Gases, Astronautica Acta, v. 14, p. 503–508 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Gvozdeva L.G. and Predvoditeleva O.A., An Experimental Study of the Mach Reflection of Shock Waves at Velocities 1000–3000 m/sec, in Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen and Air, Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR 163, 1088 (1965) Soviet Phys. Dokl. 10, 694 (1966)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gvozdeva L.G., and Predvoditeleva O.A., Mach Reflection of Shock Waves Moving with the Speed about 2000 m/sec in Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen. In Research into Physical Gas Dynamics p. 183 Nauka, Moscow (1966).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Gvozdeva L.G., Predvoditeleva O.A. and Fokeev V.P., Double Mach Reflection of Strong Shock Waves, Izv. Akad. Nauk USSR, Mech. zhidk. i gasp. 1 p. 90–112 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bazhenova T.V., Gvozdeva L.G., Lobastov Yu.S., Naboko I. M., Nemkov R.G. and Predvoditeleva O.A., Udarnye vonly v realnykh gazakh. p. 73 Moscow, Nauka Press (1968) Trans Shock Waves in Real Gases, NASA TTF-585, Washington, D.C. 20546, October 1969.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Weynants R.R., An Experimental Investigation of Shock Wave Diffraction over Compression and Expansion Corners, UTIAS Technical Note, April 1968.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sytchikova M.P., Berezkina M.K. and Semenov A.N., Flow Formation around the Model in Shock Tube, Aerophys. issledovaniya sverchzvukovych techenii. p. 7–13. Nauka Press, M.L. (1967).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    White D.R., An Experimental Survey of the Mach Reflection of Shock Waves, Proc. II Midwest Conf. Fluid. Mech. v. XVI, p. 253 (1952).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Merritt D.L., Mach Reflection on a Cone, AIAA Journal v. 8 No. 6, p. 1208–1209 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Keller J.A. and Ryan N.W., ARS Journal v. 31, No. 10 (1961).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Courant R. and Freidrichs K.O., Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Pure and Applied Mathematics v. 1, p. 318–350 Interscience, New York (1948).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana V. Bazhenova
    • 1
  1. 1.Academy of Sciences, MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations