Advertisement

A Framework to Design Controllers for Engineering Applications of Transverse Jets

  • Luca Cortelezzi
  • Robert T. M’Closkey
  • Ann R. Karagozian
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 439)

Abstract

We propose a hypothetical framework to develop control strategies to optimize the mixing characteristics associated with the actively driven jet in crossflow. This framework is a three-step design procedure. As a first step, we form a preliminary controller with a feed-forward loop in order to develop controllers able to compensate for the dynamics of actuators and sensors. As a second step, we augment the feed-forward loop with a feedback loop in order to develop a plant controller based on a hierarchy of reduced-order models. As a final step, we remove the feed-forward loop and concentrate on the robustness of the plant controller with respect to unmodeled and unpredictable uncertainties.

Keywords

Vortex Filament Sensor Dynamic Develop Control Strategy Robust Feedback Plant Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campolo, M., Degano, G. M., Cortelezzi, L. And Soldati, A., 2002 Numerical appraisal of jetto-crossflow coupling in a transverse jet. Manipulation and Control of Transverse Jets, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. M., Stufflebeam, J. H. And Proscia, W., 2001 The effect of fuel/air mixing on actuation authority in an active combustion instability control system, Asme Trans: J. Engng Gas Turb. Power 123, (3), 537.Google Scholar
  3. Cortelezzi, L., Leonard, A., And Doyle, J. C. 1994 An example of active circulation control of the unsteady separated flow past a semi-infinite plate Journal of Fluid Mechanics 260, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortelezzi, L. 1996 Nonlinear feedback control of the wake past a plate with a suction point on the downstream wall Journal of Fluid Mechanics 327, 303.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cortelezzi, L. And Karagozian, A. R., 1999 On the evolution of vorticity in pulsating jets in cross-flow, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 44, (8).Google Scholar
  6. Cortelezzi, L., King, J., Lobbia, R., M’Closkey, R., And Karagozian, A. R., 2000 Actively controlled transverse gas injection, 39 th Ieee Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, Dec 12–15.Google Scholar
  7. Cortelezzi, L. And Karagozian, A. R., 2001 On the formation of the counter-rotating vortex pair in transverse jets, J. Fluid Mech. 446, 347.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Cortelezzi, L., King, J., Karagozian, A. R. And M’Closkey, R. T., 2001 Simulations and experiments on pulsed jets in crossflow, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 45, (9).Google Scholar
  9. Cortelezzi, L., 2002 Reduced-order controllers for fluid mechanics applications, In Manipulation and Control of Transverse Jets,Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Cortelezzi, L. And Karagozian, A. R., 2002 Three-dimensional vortex modeling of unforced transverse jets, In Manipulation and Control of Transverse Jets,Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. D’Alessandro, D, Dahleh, M. And Mezic, I., 1999 Control of mixing in fluid flow: A maximum entropy approach, Ieee Transaction on Automatic Control 44, (10), 1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Alessandro, D, Mezic, I. And Dahleh, M., 2002 Statistical properties of controlled fluid flows with applications to control of mixing, Systems and Control Letters 45, (4), 249.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Eroglu, A. And Breidenthal, R. E., 2001 Structure, penetration, and mixing of pulsed jets in cross-flow, Aiaa J. 39, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fountain, G. O., Khakhar, D. V., Mezic, I. And Ottino, J. M., 2000 Chaotic mixing in a bounded three-dimensional flow, J. Fluid Mech. 417, 265.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Hermanson, J.C., Wahba, A., And Johari, H., 1998 Duty-cycle effects on penetration of fully modulated, turbulent jets in crossflow, Aiaa J. 36, (10), 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johari, H., Pacheco-Tougas, M., And Hermanson, J.C., 1999 Penetration and mixing of fully modulated turbulent jets in crossflow, Aiaa J. 37, (7), 842.Google Scholar
  17. Karagozian, A. R., 1986(a) An analytical model for the vorticity associated with a transverse jet, Aiaa J. 24, 429.Google Scholar
  18. Karagozian, A. R., 1986(b) The flame structure and vorticity generated by a chemically reacting transverse jet, Aiaa J 24, 1502.Google Scholar
  19. Karagozian, A. R., Wang, K. C., LE, A-T. And Smith, O. I., 1996 Transverse gas jet injection behind a rearward-facing step, J Propulsion and Power 12, (6), 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karagozian, A. R., 1999 Control of mixing and reactive flow processes (invited) Aiaa Paper 99–3572, 30 th Aiaa Fluid Dynamics Conference, 28 June - 1 July 1999, Norfolk, Virginia.Google Scholar
  21. Kelso, R. M., Lim, T. T., And Perry, A. E., 1996 An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow, J. Fluid Mech. 306, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiya, M., Mochizuki, O., Ishikawa, H., 2001 Interaction between vortex rings and a separated shear layer: Towards active control of separation zones, J. Fluids and Structures 15, (3–4), 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, L.S. And Morris, P.J., 1997 Absolute instability in a supersonic shear layer and mixing control, J Propulsion and Power 13, (6), 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. M’Closkey, R. T., King, J., Cortelezzi, L. And Karagozian, A. R., 2002(a) The actively controlled jet in crossflow, J. Fluid Mech. 452, 325.Google Scholar
  25. M’Closkey, R. T., King, J., Cortelezzi, L. And Karagozian, A. R., 2002(b) Active control of jets in crossflow, In Manipulation and Control of Transverse Jets,Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. MccoRmik, S. And Gursul, I., 1996 Effect of shear-layer control on leading-edge vortices, J. Aircraft 33, (6), 1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NG, T. T. And Lang, Y., 1999 Shear layer instability induced separation control, Aiaa Journal 37, (3), 386.Google Scholar
  28. Sato, N., Imamura, A., Shiba, S., Takahashi, S., et al.,1999 Advanced mixing control in supersonic airstream with a wall-mounted cavity, J. Propulsion and Power 15, (2), 358.Google Scholar
  29. Schuller, T., King, J., Majamaki, A., And Karagozian, A. R., 1999 An Experimental study of acoustically controlled gas jets in crossflow, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 44, (8), 11 1.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, S. H. And Mungal, M. G. 1998 Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 357, 83–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stroock, A. D., Dertinger, S. K. W., Ajdari, A., Mezic, I., et al.,2002 Chaotic mixer for microchannels, Science 295, (5555), 647.Google Scholar
  32. Vermeulen, P. J., Grabinski, P. And Ramesh, V.,1992 Mixing of an acoustically excited air jet with a confined hot crossflow, Asme Trans: J. Engng Gas Turb. Power 114, 46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Cortelezzi
    • 1
  • Robert T. M’Closkey
    • 2
  • Ann R. Karagozian
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations