Advertisement

Abstract

A theory of decomposition has already been developed by Sobolev, Babuska and Morgenstern and P.L. Lions. The idea is to decompose the whole structure into subregions. The standard methods involve substructuring techniques, for example, in finite element or boundary element methods. Here we introduce different approaches for the partial differential equation in each substructure. The basic idea of this paper has already been handled by the author in earlier papers [06–07].

Keywords

Boundary Element Method Trial Function Transmission Condition Layout Optimization Lame Constant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Carmine, R.: Ein Kopplungsverfahren von FEM und BEM zur Berechnung ebener Spannungskonzentrationsprobleme. Doctoral Thesis, Karlsruhe University, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Carmine, R., E. Schreck and E. Schnack: Experimental Results of Convergence Order for Two-Dimensional Coupling of FEM and BEM. ZAMM 70/6 (1990), T 699-T 701.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Karaosmanoglu, N.: Kopplung von Randelement-und Finite-ElementVerfahren für dreidimensionale elastische Strukturen. Doctoral Thesis, Karlsruhe University, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Karaosmanoglu, N. and E. Schnack: Three-Dimensional Structural Analysis with a Mixed FE-BE Method. ZAMM 70/6 (1990), T 705-T 707.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Neuber, H.: Kerbspannungslehre. Grundlagen für genaue Festigkeitsberechnung, 3rd Edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schnack, E.: Stress Analysis with a Combination of HSM and BEM. Mafelap 1984 Conference on The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications in Uxbridge/UK. In: The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Ap-. plications V. Ed.: J.R. Whiteman. Academic Press, Inc., London, Orlando, San Diego 1985, pp. 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Schnack, E.: A Hybrid BEM-Model. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 24 /5 (1987), 1015–1025.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schnack, E.: Macro-Elements Developed with BEM in Elasticity. MAFELAP 1990 Conference on The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications, 24–27 April 1990, Brunel University, Uxbridge/UK. Ed.: J.R. Whiteman. Academic Press, Inc. To appear.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Schnack, E. and G. Iancu: Sensitivity Analysis with BEM. Lecture IV, CISM-Course on Shape and Layout Optimization of Structural Systems, 16–20 July 1990, Udine/Italy. To appear.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Wendland, W.: On Asymptotic Error Estimates for Combined BEM and FEM. In: Finite Element and Boundary Element Techniques from Mathematical and Engineering Points of View. Eds.: E. Stein and W.L. Wendland. CISM Courses and Lectures 1988, No. 301, pp. 273–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Schnack
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe UniversityKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations