Advertisement

Shear Strength of Clays and Clayey Soils: the Influence of Pore Fluid Composition

  • Caterina Di Maio
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 462)

Abstract

This paper reports experimental results relative to the influence of pore fluid composition on the peak shear strength of the Bisaccia clay and on the residual shear strength of several different clayey soils: the Ponza bentonite, commercial bentonite and kaolin, Bisaccia, Gela and Marino clays. Triaxial tests were carried out on the Bisaccia clay reconstituted with distilled water and with a 1 M NaCl solution. Direct shear and ring shear tests were carried out on dry materials and on the materials reconstituted with distilled water, NaCl solutions at various concentrations, cyclohexane. Some tests were carried out by using KCl solutions, ethanol and ethylene glycol. The results show that pore fluid composition influences greatly both the peak and residual shear strength of smectitic soils, even when the clay fraction is very low. The residual friction angle is about 5° in distilled water, 15° in concentrated NaCl solution, and varies between 30° and 35° for materials dry or prepared with cyclohexane. The residual friction angle is strongly correlated to the static dielectric constant of the pore fluid.

Keywords

Shear Strength Void Ratio Triaxial Test Pore Fluid Clayey Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anandarajah, A., and Zhao, D. (2000). Triaxial Behavior of Kaolinite in Different Pore Fluids. J. of Geotechnical and Geo Environmental Engineering, 126, n. 2, p. 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anson, R. W. W., and Hawkins, A. B. (1998). The effect of calcium ions in pore water on the residual shear strength of kaolinite and sodium montmorillonite. Géotechnique, vol. XLVIII, n. 6, pp. 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Di Maio, C., and Fenelli, G.B. (1994). Residual strength of kaolin and bentonite: the influence of their constituent pore fluid. Géotechnique, vol. XLIV, n. 2, pp. 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Maio, C. (1996a). The influence of pore fluid composition on the residual shear strength of some natural clayey soils. VII International Symposium on Landslides, vol. II, pp. 1189–1194.Google Scholar
  5. Di Maio, C. (1996b). Exposure of bentonite to salt solution: osmotic and mechanical effects. Géotechnique, vol. XLVI, n. 4, pp. 695–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Maio, C., and Onorati, R. (2000a). Swelling behaviour of active clays: the case of an overconsolidated, marine origin clay. Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on landslide, Cardiff, Vol. 1, 469–474.Google Scholar
  7. Di Maio, C., and Onorati, R. (2000b). Influence of pore liquid composition on the shear strength of an active clay. Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on landslide, Cardiff, Vol. 1, 463–468.Google Scholar
  8. Di Maio, C., and Onorati, R. (2000c). Osmotic softening of overconsolidated clays. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  9. Kenney, T. C. (1967). The influence of mineralogical composition on the residual strength of natural soils. Proc. Geotech. Conf on Shear Properties of Natural Soils and Rocks, Oslo, vol.1, pp. 123129.Google Scholar
  10. Lupini, J. F., Skinner, A. E., and Vaughan, P. R. (1981). The drained residual shear strength of cohesive soils. Géotechnique 31, No. 2, pp. 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mesri, G., and Olson, R. E. (1970). Shear strength of montmorillonite. Géotechnique, vol. XX, n. 3, pp. 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of soil behaviour. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, C. A., and Mitchell, J.K. (1974). Electromagnetic forces and soil strength. Géotechnique, vol. XXIV, n. 4, pp. 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sridharan, A. (1991). Engineering behaviour of fine grained soils. Indian Geotechnical Journal, vol. XXI, n. 1, pp. 1–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caterina Di Maio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Strutture, Geotecnica, Geologia applicata all’IngegneriaUniversità della BasilicataItaly

Personalised recommendations