Advertisement

Fracture Toughness Testing of Rock

  • Finn Ouchterlony
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 275)

Abstract

Results from crack growth resistance measurements on rock are presented in this section. They are given a fracture mechanics interpretation and the influence of different test parameters is studied. The review is condensed from previous work by Ouchterlony.1,2,59

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Crack Length Compact Tension Compact Tension Specimen Fracture Toughness Testing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ouchterlony, F., Review of fracture toughness testing of rock, Swedish Detonic Research Foundation (SveDeFo) report DS 1980: 15, Stockholm, Sweden, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ouchterlony, F., Review of fracture toughness testing of rock, Solid Mechanics Archive, 7, 131, 1982.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tseng, A.A., A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the three-point bend specimen, Engng Fract Mechs, 13, 939, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Awaji, H. and Sato, S., Combined mode fracture toughness measurement by the disc test, J Engng Mtrls Techn, 100, 175, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ingraffea, A.R., Mixed mode fracture initiation in Indiana limestone and Westerly granite, in Proc 22nd US Symp Rock Machs, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1981, 186.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, M., Handin, J., and Alani, G., Fracture surface energy of rocks, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci., 9, 757, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forootan-Rad, P. and Moavenzadeh, F., Crack initiation and propagation in rock, Research report R68–29, Dept Civ Engng, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Griffith, A.A., The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Phil Trans Royal Soc London, A221, 163, 1921.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoaoland, R.G., Hahn, G.T., and Rosenfield, A.R., Influence of microstructure on fracture propagation in rock, Rock Mechanics, 5, 77, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irwin, G.R., Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate, J Appl. Mechs, 24, 361, 1957.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmidt, R.A., A microcrack model and its significance to hydraulic fracturing and fracture toughness testing, in Proc 21nd US Symp Rock Machs, Univ Missouri, Rolla MO, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, R.A. and Lutz, T.J., KIc and JIc of Westerly granite — effects of thickness and in-plane dimensions, in ASTM STP 678, Philadelphia PA, 1979, 166.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ingraffea, A.R. and Schmidt, R.A., Experimental verification of a fracture mechanics model for tensile strength prediction of Indiana limestone, in Proc 19nd US Symp Rock Machs, Univ Nevada, Reno NV, 1978, 247.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, K. and Mubeen, A., Relationship between differential stress intensity factor and crack growth in cyclic tension in Westerly granite, in ASTM STP 745, Philadelphia PA, 1981, 157.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munz, D., Minimum specimen size for the application of linear-elastic fracture mechanics, in ASTM STP 668, Philadelphia PA, 1979, 406.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barker, L.M., A simplified method for measuring plane strain fracture toughness, Engng Fract Mechs, 9, 361, 1977.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ouchterlony, F., A new core specimen for the fracture toughness testing of rock, SveDeFo report DS 1980: 17, Stockholm, Sweden, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Costin, L.S., Static and dynamic fracture behavior of oil shale, in ASTM STP 745, Philadelphia PA, 1981, 169.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rice, J.R., Mathematic analysis in the mechanics of fracture, in Fracture, an Advanced Treatise, Liebowitz, H., Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1968, 191.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rice, J.R., Paris, P.C., and Merkle, J.G., Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates, in ASTM STP 536, Philadelphia PA, 1973, 231.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finnie, I., Cooper, G.A., and Berlie, J., A comparison of fracture toughness measurements using Solnhofen limestone, Internal report 403:3, Centre Européen des Recherches Atlas Copco, Ecublens, Switzerland, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ouchterlony, F., Compliance measurements on notched rock cores in bending, SveDeFo report DS 1980: 2, Stockholm, Sweden, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ouchterlony, F., Extension of the compliance and stress intensity formulas for the single edge crack round bar in bending, in ASTM STP 745, Philadelphia PA, 1981, 237.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ouchterlony, F., The crack mouth opening displacement of the SECRBB specimen, SveDeFo report DS 1981: 21, Stockholm, Sweden, 1981.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ouchterlony, F., A simple R-curve approach to fracture toughness testing of rock with sub-size SECRBB specimens, SveDeFo report DS 1981: 18, Stockholm, Sweden, 1981.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ouchterlony, F., A simple R-curve approach to fracture toughness testing of rock core specimens, in Proc 23rd US Symp Rock Machs, Univ California, Berkeley CA, 1982, 515.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swan, G. and Olofsson, T., Towards a multi-purpose rock core testing facility, manuscript submitted to Geotech Testing Journal.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ingraffea, A.R., Gunsallus, K.L., Beech, J.F., and Nelson, P., A fracture toughness testing system for prediction of tunnel boring machine performance, in Proc 23rd US Symp Rock Machs, Univ California Berkeley CA, 1982, 463.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bush, A.J., Experimentally determined stress-intensity factors for single-edge crack round bars loaded in bending, Exp Mechs, 16, 249, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ouchterlony, F., Swan, G., and Sun, Z., A comparison of displacement measurement methods in the bending of notched rock cores. SveDeFo report manuscript, Stockholm, Sweden, 1982.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Srawley, J.E., On the relation of J1 to work done per unit area: “Total”, or component “Due to crack., Int J Fracture, 12, 1976, 470.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turner, C.E., Methods for post-yield fracture safety assessment, in Post-Yield Fracture Mechanics, Latzko, D.G.H., Ed., Applied Science Publishers, London, 1979, 23.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Munz, D., Bubsey, R.T., and Shannon Jr, J.L., Fracture touahness determination of A2203 using four-point-bend specimens with straight-through and chevron notches, J Am Ceramic Soc, 63, 30, 1980.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Munz, D., Bubsey, R.T., and Srawley, J.E., Compliance and stress intensity coefficients for short bar specimens with chevron notches, Int J Fracture, 16, 359, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bubsey, R.T., Munz, D., Pierce, W.S., and Shannon Jr, J.L., Compliance calibration of the short rod chevron-notch specimen for fracture toughness testing of brittle materials, Int J Fracture, 18, 125, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kobayashi, T., Fourney, W.L., and Holloway, D.C., Further examination of microprocess zone in pink Westerly granite, presented at Am Soc Ceramics meeting, Cincinnati OH, May 1979.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Swan, G., Some observations concerning the strength-size dependency of rock, Univ Lulea research report TULEA 1980: 01, Luleå, Sweden, 1980.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swan, G., Fracture stress scale effects, Int J Rock Mechs Min Sci., 17, 317, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wijk, G., The uniaxial strenght of rock material, Geotech Testing Journal., 3, 115, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Swan, G., The mechanical properties of Stripa granite, Technical report LBL-7074 SAC-03, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sun Zong-qi., Univ Luleå, Luleå, Sweden, 1981. Private communication.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Blackburn, W.S., Calculation of stress intensity factors for straight cracks in grooved and ungrooved shafts, Engng Fract Mechs, 8, 731, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wanhill, R.J.H., Bartelds, G., and de Koning, A.U., Fatigue crack front shape, Int J Fatigue, 4, 52, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rummel, F., and Winter, R.B., Basisdaten zur Rissausbretung bei Stimulationsversuchen in gering permeablen Sedimenten vornehmlich der Karbon-und Rotliegend Formationen, Teilprojekt im Rahmen des BMFTDGMK-Forschungsvorhabens ET 3068 A, Dept Geophysics, Ruhr Univ, Bochum, Fed Rep Germany, 1981. In German.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Atkinson, B.K., Subcritical crack propagation in rocks; theory, experimental results and applications, J Structural Geology, 4, 41, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kleinlein, W.F. and Hübner, H., The evaluation of crack resistance and crack velocity from controlled fracture experiments on ceramic bend specimens, in Proc 4th Intnl Conf on Fracture, ICF4, vol 3, 883 Taplin, D.M.R., Ed., Univ Waterloo Press, Ontario, Canada, 1977.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Swan, G. and Alm, O., Sub-critical crack growth in Stripa granite: direct observations, in Proc 23rd US Symp Rock Mechs, Univ California, Berkeley CA, 1982, 542.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ouchterlony, F., The crack extension resistance of rock as measured on core specimens, presented at Swedish National Committee for Mechanics meeting, Luleå, Sweden, Oct 1980.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Clarke, G.A., Andrews, W.R., Paris, P.C., and Schmidt, D.W., Single specimen tests for JIc determination, in ASTM STP 590, Philadelphia PA, 1976, 27.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Budiansky, B. and Hutchinson, J.W., Analysis of closure in fatigue crack growth, J Appl Mechs, 45, 267, 1978.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schwalbe, K.-H. and Setz, W., R-curve and fracture toughness of thin sheet materials, J Testing Eval, 9, 182, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McCabe, D.E.,and Landes, J.D., An evaluation of elastic-plastic methods applied to crack growth resistance measurements, in ASTM STP 668, Philadelphia PA, 1979, 288.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stillborg, B., Acoustic emission and fracture of rock cores as a function of load increase up to failure, in Failure of Rock — some results from a post graduate workshop, Swan, G., Ed., Univ Luleå technical report 1980:65T, Lulea, Sweden, 1980, 15. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Olofsson, T. and Lindqvist, P.-A., SEM investigation of mode I crack propagation in Ekeberg marble, Ibid, 2. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ouchterlony, F., Fracture toughness testing of rock cores 1. Three point bend tests on Ekeberg marble, SveDeFo report DS 1978:8, Stockholm, Sweden, 1978. In Swedish.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Barker, L.M., Process zone effects in fracture toughness tests of brittle non-metallic materials, presented at the ASTM Symposium on fracture Mechanics Methods for Ceramics, Rock; and Concrete, Chicago IL, June 23–24, 1980.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Beech, J.F. and Ingraffea, A.R., Three-dimensional finite element calibration of the short-rod specimen, Int J Fracture, 18, 217, 1982.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Barton, C.R., Variables in fracture energy and toughness testing of rock, in Proc 23rd US Symp Rock Mechs, Univ California, Berkeley CA, 1982, 449.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ouchterlony, F., Anisotropy effects in the fracture toughness testing of rock, SveDeFo report manuscript, Stockholm, Sweden, 1982.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hawkes, I., Mellor, M., and Gariepy, S., Deformation of rocks under uniaxial tension, Int J Rock Mechs Min Sci, 10, 493, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Douglass, P.M. and Voight, B., Anisotropy of granites: a reflection of microscopicfabric, Géotechnique, 19, 376, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Peng, S. and Johnson, A.M., Crack growth and faulting in cylindrical specimens of Chelmsford granite, Int J Rock Mechs Min Sci, 9, 37, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cleary, M.P., Some deformation and fracture characteristics of oil shale, in Proc 19th US Symp Rock Mechs, vol 2, Univ Nevada, Reno NV, 1978, 72.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chong, K.P., Uenishi, K., Smith, J.W., and Munari, A.C., Non-linear three dimensional mechanical characterization of Colorado oil shale, Int J Rock Mechs Min Sci, 17, 339, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Henry, J.P., Pacquet, J, and Tancrez, J.P., Experimental characterization of crack propagation in calcite rocks, Int J Rock Mechs Min Sci, 14, 85, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schmidt, R.A., Fracture toughness testing of limestone, Exp Mechs, 16, 161, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schmidt, R.A., Fracture mechanics of oil shale — unconfined fracture toughness, stress corrosion cracking, and tension test results, in Proc 18th US Symp Rock Mechs, paper 2A2, Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO, 1977.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hangen, J.A., A study of determination and fracture of oil shale, M Sc thesis, Dept Mech Engng, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1977.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Switchenko, P.M., The thermomechanical response of oil shale, M Sc thesis, Dept Mech Engng, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1979.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Costin, L.S., A failure surface model for oil shale, report SAND811128, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque NM, 1981.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sih, G.C. and Liebowitz, H., Mathematical theories of brittle fracture, in Fracture, an Advanced Treatise, Liebowitz, H., Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1968, 67.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bowie, O.L. and Freese, C.E., central crack in plane orthotropic rectangular sheet, Int J Fract Mechs, 8, 49, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Delale, F. and Erdogan, F., The problem of internal and edge cracks in an orthotropic strip, J Appl Mechs, 44, 237, 1977.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Miller, B.L. and Cleary, M.P., Finite element analysis of fracture geometries for toughness testing in rock, Report RELR-80–1, Dept Mech Engng, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1980.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Merkle, J.G. and Corten, H.C., A J-integral analysis for the compact specimen considering axial force as well as bending effects, J Press Vess Techn, 4, 286, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wilkening, W.W., J-integral measurements in geological materials, in Proc 19th US Symp Rock Mechs, vol 1, Univ Nevada, Reno NV, 1978, 254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Finn Ouchterlony
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish Detonic Research FoundationStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations