Advertisement

Experimental Evidence of Non-Linear and Creep Behaviour of Pyroclastic Rocks

  • A. Evangelista
  • S. Aversa
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 350)

Abstract

An analysis of the mechanical behaviour of pyroclastic rocks is discussed in this paper, with particular evidence to non-linear and creep behaviour. This topic is treated presenting experimental results obtained on Neapolitan tuffs at the University of Naples. Standard tests, which outline the non-linear behaviour of these rocks, have been performed for many years and their results have been presented in many papers. Although creep tests on the Neapolitan tuffs have also been performed for many years, their results have never been published before this paper. For this reason a substantially different approach is used in discussing the non-linearity and creep behaviour of these materials. In the paper a comparison with comparable behaviour of other rocks and soils is presented.

Keywords

Axial Stress Uniaxial Compressive Strength Creep Test Creep Behaviour Triaxial Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AGI: Raccomandazioni lulle esecuzioni delle indagini geotecniche. Associazione Geotecnica Italiana, Roma 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geological Society: The logging of rock cores for engineering purposes. Q.J. Engng. Geol. 3, n.1: 1–24, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogawa Y.: Geology Ishikawa, no.40. Ishikawa Soil Corporated Association, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evangelista A., Pellegrino A.: - Ripartizione delle tensioni tra sche/etro solido ed acqua nel tufo giallo napoletano. Atti del Convegno “Bradisismo e fenomeni connessi”, Napoli, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feda J.: Creep of Soils and Related Phenomena, Elsevier, London 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pellegrino A.: Proprietà fisico-meccaniche dei terreni vulcanici del napoletano. Atti del VIII Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, Cagliari 1967.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pellegrino A.: Compressib/lità e resistenza a rottura del Tufo Gia/lo Napoletano. Atti del IX Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica - Genova, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pellegrino A.: Mechanical b’éhavïÖuw of Soft Rocks under high stresses. Proc. of the 2nd. Congress of the Int. Soc. for. Rock Mech., Vol.3–25, Belgrade, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pellegrino A.: Le rocce lapidee tenere. Ricerche in corso: risultati e linee di sviluppo del Gruppo di ricerche Terreni e Strutture del CNR, Napoli, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pellegrino A.: Surface footings on Soft Rocks. Proc. of the Third Congress of the International Society of rock Mechanics, Denver 1974.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evangelista A.: Influenza del contenuto d’acqua sul comportamento de/ tufo giallo napo/etano. Atti del XIV Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, Firenze 1980.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evangelista A., Lapegna U., Pellegrino A.: Problemi geotecnici ne/la città di Napoli per la presenza di cavità ne/la formazione del Tufo. Atti del XIV Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, Firenze 1980.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paparo Filomarino M., Pellegrino A. L’effetto dimensione ne/ Tufo Giallo Napoletano. Atti del XIV Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica, Firenze 1980.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aurisicchio S., Evangelista A., Masi P.: // Tufo Giallo Napole-tano: permeabilità ed impregnabilità con monomeri acrilici. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica (1956) Anno XVI N.1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aurisicchio S., Masi P., Nicolais L., Evangelista A., Pellegrino A.: Polymer impregnation of Tuff. Polymer Composites (1982), July, Vol.3, N.3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rippa F., Vinale F.: Structure and Mechanical Behaviour of a Volcanic Tuff. Proc. of V Congress of ISRM, Melbourne 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aurisicchio S., Evangelista A., Nicolais L.: Comportamento meccanico del tufo trattato con po/imeri. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica (1985), Anno XIX, n. 2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evangelista A., Pellegrino A.: Caratteristiche geotecniche di alcune rocce tenere italiane. Atti del terzo ciclo di Conferenze di Meccanica e Ingegneria delle Rocce MIR90, Torino 26–29 Novembre 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aversa S., Evangelista A., Ramondini M.: Influenza della struttura sulfa compressibilità di un tufo vu/canico. Atti della Riunione Annuale dei Ricercatori del G.N.C.S.I.G. del C.N.R., 157–160, Roma 1990.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aversa S., Evangelista A., Ramondini M.: Snervamento e resitenza a rottura di un tufo a grana fine. Atti del II Convegno dei Ricercatori del G.N.C.S.I.G. del C.N.R., Vol. 1: 3–22, Ravello 1991.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aversa, S.: Mechanical behaviour of soft rocks: some remarks. Proc. of the Workshop on “Experimental characterization and modelling of soils and soft rocks”, 191–223, Napoli 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aversa S., Evangelista A., Leroueil S., Picarelli L.: Some aspects of the mechanical behaviour of “structured” soils and soft rocks. Proc. of International Symposium on “Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils and Soft Rocks”, vol.’): 359–366, Athens 1993.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leroueil, S., Vaughan, P.R.: The general and congruent effects of the structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Géotechnique (1990), Vol. 40 (3): 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Conrad H.: The role of grain boundaries in creep and stress rupture. In Dorn J. E. (Ed.) Mechanical Behaviour of materials at elevated temperatures: 218–269, Mc. Graw Hill New York 1961.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lubahn J. D.: Deformation Phenomena. In Dorn J. E. (Ed.) Mechanical Behaviour of materials at elevated temperatures: 319–392, Mc. Graw Hill New York 1961.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quingley R.M., Thompson C.D.: The fabric of anisotropically consolidated sensitive marine clay. C.n. Geot. J. (1966), Vol. 3, n. 2: 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshinaka R., Yamabe T. - Deformation behaviourofsoft rocks. Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Weak Rocks: 87–92, Tokyo 1981.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Travi B.: Comportamento meccanico dei terreni strutturati e delle rocce lapidee teuere. Tesi di Laurea (unpublished), Napoli 1993.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ohtsuki H., Nishi K., Okamoto T., Tanaka S.: Time-dependent characteristics of strength and deformation of a mudstone. Proc. Int. Symp. on Weak Rocks, Vol. 1: 107–112, Tokyo 1981.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elliot G.M., Brown E.T.: Yield of a soft, high porosity rock. Geotechnique (1985), Vol. 35, No. 4: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elliot G.M., Brown E.T.: Further developments of a plasticity approach to yield in porous rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. (1986), Vol. 23, No. 2: 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maekawa H.: Mechanical Properties of soft rocks and indurated soils. Report of the technical Committee on Soft Rocks and Indurated Soils, Rio de Janeiro 1989.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lefebvre G.: Contribution à /’etude de stabilité des pentes dans les argiles cimentées. Ph.D. Thesis, Laval University, Quebec 1978.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoshinaka R., Yamabe T.: A strength criterion of rocks and rock masses. Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Weak Rock: 613–618, Tokyo 1981.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Price A.M., Farmer I.W.: Application of yield models to rock. I.t. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. (1979), Vol. 16: 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Price A.M., Farmer I.W.: The Hvorslev surface in rock deformation. I.t. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. (1981), Vol. 18: 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akai K., Adachi T., Nishi K.: Mechanical Properties of Soft Rocks. Proc. of IX ICSMFE, Vol. 1: 7–10, Tokyo 1977.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Adachi T., Ogawa T., Hayashi M.: Mechanical properties of soft rocks and rock mass. Proc. of the 10th ICSMFE, Vol.1: 527–530, Stockholm 1981.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clough, G.W, Sitar, N., Bachus, R.C., Rad, N.S.: Cemented sands under static loads. J. Geotech. Engrg. Div. ASCE (1981), Vol. 107 (6): 799–817.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maccarini M.: Laboratory studies of a weakly bonded artificial soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London (U.K.) 1987.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lade P.V., Overton D.D.: Cementation Effects in Frictional Materials. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE (1989), Vol. 115, No. 10: 1373–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gerogiannopoulos N.G., Brown E.T.: The critical state concept applied to rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. (1978), Vol. 15: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nova R.: Discussione su: Snervamento e resistenza a rottura di un tufo a grana fine di Aversa S., Evangelista A., Ramondini M. Atti del II Convegno dei Ricercatori del G.N.C.S.I.G. del C.N.R., Vol. 2, Ravello 1991.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nova R.: An extended Cam-Clay model for soft anisotropic rocks. Computers and Geotechnics (1986), Vol.2: 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Esaki T., Kimura T., Nishida T.: The Yield Function with End-Cap Based on Plasticity Theory. Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. on Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials, Vol.1: 387–394, Tucson - Arizona 1987.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nova R.: Deformabilità, resistenza meccanica, modern costitutivi delle rotte tenere. Atti del terzo ciclo di Conferenze di Meccanica e Ingegneria delle Rocce MIR90, Torino 1990.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wood D.M.: Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics. Cambridge University Press 1990.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chercasov I.I.: The residual deformations caused by the deep penetration of a rigid plate into a brittle porous material. Proc. of ICSMFE, Vol. 1. Oslo 1967.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vesic S.A.: Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. In: Winterkorn H.F. and Fang Y. (Eds.) “Foundation Engineering Handbook”:121–147, 1975.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Marino O., Macolo G., Cioffi R., Colantuono A., Dal Vecchio S.: Tufi vulcanici: meccanismi di deterioramento chimico-fisico e tipologia di intervento. L’Edilizia, n. 9: 523–535, 1991. 1Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Aversa S.: Comportamento del Tufo Giallo Napoletano ad elevate temperature. Tesi di Dottorato di Ricerca in Ingegneria Geotecnica, Università di Napoli 1989.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aversa S., Evangelista A.: Thermal expansion of Neapolitan Yellow Tuff. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1993 (in print).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lama R.D., Vutukuri V.S.: Handbook on Mechanical Properties of Rocks. Trans Tech Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Afrouz A., Harvey J.M.: Rheology of rocks within the soft to medium strength range. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. (1974), Vol. 11, n. 7: 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Obert L., Duvall W.I.: Rock Mechanics and the Design of Structures in Rocks. Wiley, New York 1967.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Adachi T., Takase A.: Prediction of long term strength of soft sedimentary rocks. Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Weak Rock: 99–104, Tokyo 1981.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Okamoto: Multistage creep tests analysis of mudstone. Proc. of XI ICSMFE, Vol.2: 1027–1030, San Francisco 1985.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kenney: A Review of recent researches on strength and consolidation of soft sensitive clays. Can. Geot. J.(1968), Vol. 5, N. 2: 97–119.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Monkam F. C., Grant N.J.: An empirical relation between rupture life and minimum creep rate in creep rupture tests. ASTM Proc. (1956), Vol. 56: 593–605.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Saito M., Uezawa H.: Failure of soils due to creep. Proc. of V ICSMFE, Vol. 1: 315–318, Paris 1961.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sangha C.M., Dhir R.K.: Influence of time on the strength deformation, and fracture properties of a Lower Devonian Sanstone. Int. J. R.ck Mech. Min. Sci. (1972), Vol. 9, N. 3: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wawersik W. K. Time-dependent rock-behaviour in uniaxial compression. XIV Symp. Rock. Mech.:85–106, University Park, Pennsylvania 1972.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Stavrogin A. N., Lodus E.V.: Creep and time dependence of the strength in rocks. Sov. Min. Sci. (1974), Vol. 10, N. 6: 653–658.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ferrari P., Paolella G.: Gallerie stradali e ferroviarie. Atti dello VIII Convegno di Geotecnica, Cagliari 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Evangelista
    • 1
  • S. Aversa
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations