Diagnostic Techniques in Condition Monitoring

  • G. Diana
  • A. Vania
  • A. Vallini
  • G. A. Zanetta
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 352)


The main purpose of permanent monitoring of rotating machinery is the early detection of fault conditions. This goal can be achieved by identifying abnormal changes in current data in respect with reference values defined on the basis of the data collected during a first monitoring period with the machine in normal state. Furthermore, acceptance regions can be evaluated for each typical operating condition of the plant in order to recognize abnormal changes in the machine vibrations due to fault conditions, deviating from normal changes caused by variations in the process parameters. This monitoring strategy allows to obtain useful information for diagnosing the causes of malfunction conditions.

Some different techniques used to define acceptance regions are shown in this paper. Furthermore, some results obtained by two experiences in monitoring large turbine-generator units are illustrated. The advantages of different diagnostic techniques used to define acceptance regions of monitoring data collected both in steady state and transient conditions are discussed.


Bivariate Normal Distribution Acceptance Region Vibration Data Rotor Vibration Alarm Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    W.W. Hines, D.C. Montgomery, Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd Edition, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.M. Mood, F.A. Graybill, D.C. Boes, An Introduction to Statistics, McGraw-Hill, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D.L. Thomas, “Detecting Changes in Machine Vibrations”. VDI Conference on “Schwingungsuberwachung von Maschinen”, Hamburg, Germany, 1985. V.D.I. Berichte 568, 31–52.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D.L. Thomas, “Turbine Generator Vibration Monitoring in the CEGB”, IFToMM International Conference on Rotordynamics, Tokyo, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Curami, M. Gasparetto, A. Vania, “An On-line Application of a Turbomachinery Supervisory System”, IFToMM International Conference on Rotordynamics. Lyon, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Vania, “Identification of Models in Rotormachinery Diagnostics”, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanics, Internal Report, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Diana
    • 1
  • A. Vania
    • 1
  • A. Vallini
    • 2
  • G. A. Zanetta
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical University of MilanMilanItaly
  2. 2.ENEL S.p.A. DPT/VDT/STEPisaItaly
  3. 3.ENEL S.p.A. DSR/CRACologno MonzeseItaly

Personalised recommendations