Skip to main content

Block Iterative Strategies for Multiaquifer Flow Models

  • Chapter
Advanced Methods for Groundwater Pollution Control

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 364))

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

When groundwater flow takes place in aquifer-aquitard systems characterized by a high contrast of hydrogeological parameters and non-linear aquitard behavior, quasi — three-dimensional models of flow must be solved by a fully numerical approach. The numerical implementation with finite difference or finite element methods involves large systems whose solution requires much CPU time and computer storage. A new solution strategy of the resulting algebraic equations is suggested to overcome non-linearity in the aquitards. The global nonlinear system is decoupled into a number of smaller subsystems, which are consistent with the geologic structure of the multiaquifer system and are ideally suited for updating the nonlinear hydrologic parameters in the aquitards. The aquifer and the aquitard equations are solved separately with the modified conjugate gradient (MCG) and the Thomas algorithms, respectively, while the final coupled solution is obtained with an iterative procedure. The procedure, as is naturally suggested by the special block tridiagonal pattern of the coefficient matrix, can be shown to be equivalent to a block Gauss-Seidel strategy and can therefore be generalized into a block SOR (successive over-relaxation) strategy, the blocks corresponding to the aquifer and aquitard equations. The convergence properties of the new SOR scheme are initially analyzed with linear porous systems for which the optimum over-relaxation factor ω opt can be theoretically computed, and the asymptotic convergence rate is studied in relation to the geometry, the hydrogeological parameters of the multiaquifer system and the size of the numerical model. The results obtained with steady state sample problems show that if flow in the various aquifers is weakly interconnected (i.e. the hydraulic exchange between the aquifer units is quite limited) ω opt is close to 1, while in strongly coupled systems ω opt falls into the upper range (1.5 <ω opt <2) and the SOR asymptotic convergence rate can be as much as one order of magnitude larger than the Gauss-Seidel rate. Subsequently the block iterative method has been extended to non-linear porous media and early results indicate that the relaxation procedure with ω = ω opt provides a significant acceleration of convergence as well. The linear theory, however, does no more apply and ω opt must be assessed empirically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Herrera, I. and G. E. Figueroa Vega, A correspondence principle for the theory of leaky aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 5, 900–904, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrera, I., Theory of multiple leaky aquifers, Water Resour. Res. 6, 185–193, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Herrera, I. and R. Yates, Integrodifferential equations for systems of leaky aquifers and applications, 3, A numerical method of unlimited applicability, Water Resour. Res. 13 (4), 725–732, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Marsily, G., E. Ledoux, A. Levassor, D. Poitrinal and A. Salem, Modeling of large multiaquifer systems: Theory and application, J. Hydrol. 36, 1–33, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hennart, J. P., R. Yates and I. Herrera, Extension of the integrodifferential approach to inhomogeneous multiaquifer systems, Water Resour. Res. 17, 1044–1050, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Premchitt, J. A., A technique in using integrodifferential equations for model simulation of multiaquifer systems, Water Resour. Res. 17, 162–168, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gambolati, G., F. Sartoretto and F. Uliana, A conjugate gradient finite element model of flow for large multiaquifer systems, Water Resour. Res. 22 (7), 1003–1015, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujinawa, K., Finite element analysis of groundwater flow in multiaquifer systems, 2, A quasi three dimensional flow model, J. Hydrol. 33, 349–362, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chorley, D. W. and E. O. Frind, An iterative quasi three-dimensional finite element model for heterogeneous multiaquifer systems, Water Resour. Res. 14 (5), 943–952, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neuman, S. P., C. Preller and T. N. Narashiman, Adaptive explicit-implicit quasi three-dimensional finite element model of flow and subsidence in multiaquifer systems, Water Resour. Res. 18 (5), 1551–1561, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivera, A., Modèle hydrogéologique quasi-tridimensionnel non-linéaire pour simuler la subsidence dans les systèmes aquifères multicouches. Cas de Mexico. PhD thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris-CIG, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hantush, M. S., Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 3713–3725,1960.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Westlake, J. R., Numerical Matrix Inversion and Solution of Linear Equations. John Wiley, New York, 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kershaw, D. S., The incomplete Cholesky-conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations, J. Comp. Phys. 26, 43–65, 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gambolati, G., Fast solution to finite element flow equations by Newton iteration and modified conjugate gradient method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15, 661–675, 1980.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gambolati, G., Perspective on a modified conjugate gradient method for the solution of linear sets of subsurface equations. In: Wang, S. Y. and et al. (eds.) 3rd Int. Conf. Finite Elements in Water Resources. Missisipi University Press, pp 2.15–2. 30, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gambolati, G. and A. M. Perdon, The conjugate gradients in flow and land subsidence modeling. In: Bear, J. and Y. Corapcioglu (eds.) Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media. NATO-ASI Series, Applied Sciences 82, Martinus Nijoff B.V., The Hague, pp 953–984, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varga, R. S., Matrix Iterative Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Young, D., Iterative methods for solving partial differential equations of the elliptic type, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 76, 92–111, 1954.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rudolph, D. and E. O. Frind, Hydraulic response of highly compressible aquitards during consolidation, Water Resour. Res. 27 (1), 17–30, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gambolati, G., Teatini, P. (1995). Block Iterative Strategies for Multiaquifer Flow Models. In: Gambolati, G., Verri, G. (eds) Advanced Methods for Groundwater Pollution Control. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 364. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2696-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2696-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82714-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2696-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics