Advertisement

Applications of Time-Domain Reflectometry Techniques to Field-Scale Tracer Testing in Unsaturated Sediments

  • D. L. Rudolph
  • P. Ferré
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 364)

Abstract

Field scale tracer testing in partially saturated sediments has proven to be extremely challenging due, in part, to limitations of available monitoring instrumentation. Recent developments and applications of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) techniques to measure volumetric water content and solute mass flux rapidly and non-destructively have provided new flexibility in tracer testing design. Installation of networks of thin TDR probes in the subsurface have very little influence on natural flow conditions and can permit detailed spatial and temporal monitoring of transient water content distributions and solute migration in three dimensions. The TDR techniques are described in this paper along with two field-scale tracer tests to illustrate the application of the TDR methods to evaluating water flow and solute transport behaviour in the unsaturated zone.

Keywords

Breakthrough Curve Unsaturated Zone Vadose Zone Volumetric Water Content Tracer Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    LeBlanc, D.R., P.S. Garabedian, K.M. Hess, L.W. Gelhar, R.D. Quadri, K.G. Stollenwerk, and W.W. Wood, Large-scale natural-gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod. Massachusetts: 1. Experimental design and observed tracer movement, Water Resour. Res., 27, 895–910, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mackay, D.M., D.L. Freyberg, P.V. Roberts, and J.A. Cherry, A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer, 1. Approach and overview of plume movement, Water Resour. Res., 22, 2017–2029, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biggar, J.W., and D.R. Nielsen, Spatial variability of leaching characteristics of a field soil, Water Resour. Res., 12, 78–84, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowman, R.S., and R.C. Rice, Transport of conservative tracers in a field under intermittent flood irrigation, Water Resour. Res., 22, 1531–1536, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Wesenbeeck, I.J., and R.G. Kachanoski, Spatial scale dependence of in situ solute transport, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 41, 10–13, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    LeBlanc, D.R., D.L. Rudolph, R.G. Kachanoski and M.A. Celia, Design and operation of an infiltration experiment in the unsaturated zone, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology Program, Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Monterey, California, USGS Water Resources Investigation Report, eds. G.E. Mallard and D.A. Aronson, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth, K., W.A. Jury, H. Fluhler, and W. Attinger, Transport of chloride through an unsaturated field soil, Water Resour., Res., 27, 2533–2541, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wierenga, P.J., R.G. Hills, and D.B. Hudson, The Las Cruces trench site: Characterization, experimental results, and one-dimensional flow predictions, Water Resour. Res., 27, 2695–2705, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Topp, G.C., J.L. Davis, and A.P. Annan, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines, Water Resour. Res., 16, 574–582, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kachanoski, R.G., E. Pringle, and A. Ward, Field measurement of solute travel times using time domain reflectometry, Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 56, 4752, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Topp, G.C., and J.L. Davis, Measurement of soil water using time-domain reflectometry (TDR): A field evaluation, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49, 19–24, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferré, P.A., D.L. Rudolph and R.G. Kachanoski. A multi-level wave guide forGoogle Scholar
  13. profiling water content using time domain reflectometry. Time domain reflectometry in environmental infrastructure and mining applications, symposium proceedings, pp. 81–89, United States Bureau of Mines, Evanston, Illinois, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Dalton, F.N., W.N. Herkelrath, D.S.Rawlins, and J.D.Rhoads, Timedomain reflectometry. Simultaneous measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity with a single probe, Science (Washington, D.C.) 224, 989–990, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Elrick, D.A., R.G. Kachanoski, E.A. Pringle and A.L. Ward, Parameter estimates of field solute transport models based on time-domain reflectometry measurements, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1663–1666, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    Hess, K.M., S.H. Wolf, and M.A. Celia, Large-scale natural-gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 3. Hydraulic conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersivities, Water Resour. Res., 28, 2011–2027, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    MacFarlane, D.S., J.A. Cherry, R.W. Gillham, and E.A. Sudicky, Migration of contaminants in groundwater at a landfill: A case study, 1. Groundwater flow and plume delineation, J. Hydrol., 63, 1–29, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    Rudolph, D,L., R.G. Kachanoski, M.A. Celia, and D.R. LeBlanc, Infiltration and solute transport experiments in unsaturated sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Experimental design and overview of results, in submission, Water Resour. Res., 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Poulsen, M.M., and B.H. Kueper, A field experiment to study the behaviour of tetrachloroethylene in unsaturated porous media, Environ. Sei. and Tech., Vol. 26, No. 5, 889–895, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    Nwankwor, G.I., R.W. Gillham, G. van der Kamp, and F. Akindunni, Unsaturated and saturated flow in response to pumping of an unconfined aquifer: Field evidence of delayed drainage, Ground Water, Vol. 30, No. 5, 690–700, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    Xie, X., Solute transport and remediation in the interface zone: Mathematical Modelling and field investigations, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Archie, G.E.. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. AIME 146, 54–62. 1942.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. Rudolph
    • 1
  • P. Ferré
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations