Verification of Active and Passive Ground-Water Contamination Remediation Efforts

  • M. J. Barcelona
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 364)


The verification of ground-water contamination remediation efforts requires thorough documentation of subsurface conditions before, during and after cleanup efforts have ceased. The documentation include include proof of: reduction of risk to human or environmental health, achievement of regulatory cleanup concentration goals in soil, gas or liquid media, or verification of continued approach to background environmental quality conditions. Meeting any one or all of these requirements calls for a comprehensive approach to the design and operation of remediation efforts with an emphasis on the monitoring of environmental conditions. These tasks are most challenging for in-situ remediation efforts which employ active (i.e., pumping or vacuum application) rather than passive (i.e., natural water and vapor gradient) conditions.


Organic Contaminant Ground Water Flow Site Characterization Mass Balance Approach Aquifer Property 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Scalf, M.R., J.F. McNabb, W.J. Dunlop, R.L. Cosby, and J.S. Fryberger: Manual of Groundwater Sampling Procedures, National Water Well Association, (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barcelona, M.J., J.P. Gibb, J.A. Helfrich and E.E. Garske: Practical Guide for Ground-Water Sampling. Illinois State Water Survey, SWS Contract Report 374, Ada, OK: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1985a).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, RCRA Technical Enforcement Guidance Document, OSWER-9950.1, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., (1986), 208 pp. Appendices.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eklund, B.: Detection of Hydrocarbons in Ground Water by Analysis of Shallow Soil Gas/Vapor, API Publication No. 4394, Washington, D.C., (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plumb, R.H.: A comparison of ground-water monitoring data from CERCLA and RCRA sites, Ground Wat. Mon. Rev., 7 (1987), 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robbins, G.A.: Influence of using purged and partially penetrating wells on contaminant detection, mapping and modeling, Ground Wat., 27 (1989), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste, RCRA Ground Water Monitoring: Draft Technical Guidance Document, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., (1992a) EPA/530-R-93–001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barcelona, M.J., T. R. Holm, M.R. Schock and G.E. George: Spatial and temporal gradients in aquifer oxidation-reduction conditions, Wat. Res. Res., 25 (1989), 998–1003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Proceedings of the Ground Water Sampling Workshop, Dallas, TX, December 8–10, 1993. U.S. EPA-R.S. Kerr Laboratory, Ada, OK, EPA Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C., (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson, J.T. 1993: Testing Bioremediation in the Field, p. 160–184 in In-Situ Bioremediation - When Does It Work?, Committee on In-Situ Bioremediation, Water Science and Technology Board National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 207 PP.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Personal communication. T.H. Wiedemeier - T.H. Wiedemeier, D.C. Downey, J.T. Wilson, D.H. Kampbell, R.N. Miller, J.E. Hansen, Draft Technical Protocol for Implementing the Intrinsic Remediation (Natural Attenuation) with Long-Term Monitoring Option for Dissolved-Phase Fuel Contamination in Ground Water. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Brooks AFB, San Antonio, TX, March 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Research Council, In-Situ Bioremediation -When Does It Work?, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1993), 207 pp.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Journel, A.G.: Geostatistics: models and tools for the earth sciences, Math. Geol., 18 (1986), 119–140.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoeksema, R.J. and P.K. Kitanidis: Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers, Wat. Res. Res., 21 (1985), 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gilbert, R.O. and J.O Simpson.: Kriging for estimating spatial patterns of contaminants: potential and problems,“ Environ. Monit. and Assess., 5 (1985), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Barcelona
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations