Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 363))

Abstract

Current ILP algorithms typically use variants and extensions of the greedy search. This prevents them to detect significant relationships between the training objects. Instead of myopic impurity functions, we propose the use of the heuristic based on RELIEF for guidance of ILP algorithms. At each step, in our ILP-R. system, tins heuristic is used to determine a beam of candidate literals. The beam is then used in an exhaustive search for a potentially good conjunction of literals. From the efficiency point of view we introduce interesting declarative bias which enables us to keep the growth of the training set, when introducing new variables, within linear bounds (linear with respect to the clause length). This bias prohibits cross-referencing of variables in variable dependency tree. The resulting system has been tested on various artificial problems. The advantages and deficiencies of our approach are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breiman L., Friedman.I.11. (Ashen R.A. St Stone C.J. (1984) Classification and Regression Trccs Wadsworth International Group.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cestnik B. k Bratko I. (1991) On estimating probabilities in tree pruning, Proc. European Working Session on Learning, (Porto. March 1991 ), Y.Kodratoff (ed.), Springer Verlag. pp. 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cestnik, B., Kononenko, I. k Bratko, I. (1987) ASSISTANT 86: A knowledge elicitation tool for sophisticated users. In: I. Bratko k N. Lavrac (eds.), Progress in Machine Learning. Wilmslow, England: Sigma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dzeroski S. (1991) Handling noise in inductive logic programming, M.SC. Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of electrical engineering k computer science, Ljubljana., Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kira K. k Rendell L. (1992a) A practical approach to feature selection, Proc. Intern. C’onf. on Machine Learning (Aberdeen, July 1992) D.Sleeman k P.Edwards (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, pp.249–2.56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kira K. S.: Rendell L. (1992b) The feature selection problem: traditional methods and new algorithm. Proc. AAAI’92, San Jose, CA. July 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kononenko 1. (1994) Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF. Proc. European C’onf. on Machine Learning (Catania, April 1991). L. De Raedt F.Bergadano (eds.). Springer Verlag. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kononenko, I. k Bratko, I. (1991) Information based evaluation criterion for classifier’s performance. Machine Learning, 6: 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kovacic M. (1994) Stochastic inductive logic programming. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of electr. eng. k computer se., Ljubljana. Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovacic, M.. Lavrac, N., Grobelnik, M., Zupanie. I)., Mladenic, D. (1992) Stochastic Search in Inductive Logic Programming. Proceedings of the tenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vienna, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mladenie D. (1993) Combinatorial optimization in inductive concept learning. Proc. 10th Intern, C’onf. on,Machine Learning. (Amherst,.tune 1993). Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muggleton S. (ed.) (1992) Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.Pompe, M.Kovacic R- I.Konouenko (1993) SFO1L: Stochastic approach to inductive logic programming. Proc. Sloivniorn (_’onf. on Electrical Login« ring and (`nnrputc r Science. Portorot, Slovenia. Sept. 1993, pp 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quinlan R. (1986) Induction of decision trees,.1lachinc Lcorninq.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quinlan R. (1990) Learning logical definitions from relations..)/arms n Liurnrnq. 5:239266.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smyth P., Goodman R.M. k Higgins C. (1990) A hybrid Rule-based 13ayesian Classifier. Proc.European C’onf. on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm. August. 1990, pp. 610-(i1:í.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pompe, U., Kononenko, I. (1995). Linear Space Induction in First Order Logic with Relieff. In: Della Riccia, G., Kruse, R., Viertl, R. (eds) Proceedings of the ISSEK94 Workshop on Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Artificial Intelligence. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 363. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2690-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2690-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-82713-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2690-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics