Piezoelectric analysis with FEM and BEM
This paper gives an introduction to the numerical solution of dynamic piezoelectric problems using Finite Element and Boundary Element Methods. A comparative approach explains the similarities and differences, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the respective methods. The basic equations of piezoelectricity are summed up, and the Finite Element and Boundary Element Method are formulated for piezoelectric continua. By means of a numerical example, both methods are compared for the case of three-dimensional transient piezoelectricity.
KeywordsFinite Element Method Boundary Element Boundary Element Method Piezoelectric Material Active Vibration Control
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bathe, K.-J. (1996). Finite element procedures. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Gaul, L. and Fiedler, C. (1996). Baundurn Element Methods. in.Statics and Dynamics (in German). Braunschweig: Verlag Vieweg.Google Scholar
- Kögl, M., and Gaul, L. A Boundary Element Method for transient piezoelectric analysis. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements (submitted).Google Scholar
- Kögl, M., and Gaul, L. (1999). Dual reciprocity boundary element method for three-dimensional prob-lents of dynamic piezoelectricity. In Boundary Elements XXI, 537–548. Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications.Google Scholar
- Nye, J. F. (1985). Physical properties of crystals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L. (1991). They finite element method, volume 2. London: McGraw-Hill, fourth edition.Google Scholar
- Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Taylor, R. L. (1994). The finite element method. volume 1. London: McGraw-Hill, fourth edition.Google Scholar